The number of foreign residents in Japan has reached a record high of 3,956,619 individuals, as reported by the Immigration Services Agency. This figure represents an increase of approximately 190,000 from the previous year. Among these foreign nationals, Chinese residents are the largest group, totaling 900,738. They are followed by Vietnamese nationals at 660,483 and South Koreans at 409,584.

In terms of illegal residency, there were 71,229 foreigners staying in Japan without proper documentation as of July. This number reflects a decrease of about 3,634 individuals or 4.9 percent compared to six months prior. The largest group among those overstaying their visas is Vietnamese nationals with 13,070 individuals.

The Japanese government aims to eliminate the issue of visa overstays entirely.

Original article (japan) (chinese) (vietnamese)

The article provides some factual information about the number of foreign residents in Japan, including statistics on illegal residency. However, it lacks actionable information that readers can use in their daily lives. There are no clear steps or advice for individuals regarding immigration issues or how to navigate residency regulations.

In terms of educational depth, the article presents basic statistics but does not delve into the reasons behind the increase in foreign residents or the implications of visa overstays. It fails to explain the context or systems related to immigration policies in Japan, which would help readers understand these trends better.

Regarding personal relevance, while the topic may matter to those living in Japan or considering moving there, it does not provide insights that directly affect a reader's life choices or circumstances. The information is more about general trends rather than practical implications for individuals.

The article does not serve a public service function; it merely reports statistics without offering any warnings, safety advice, or resources that could be useful for people dealing with immigration issues. It lacks new context and simply reiterates existing public information.

There is no practical advice given; therefore, there are no clear actions that normal people can realistically take based on this article. It does not offer solutions or guidance on how to address visa overstays or legal residency challenges.

In terms of long-term impact, the article does not provide ideas or actions that could have lasting benefits for readers. It focuses solely on current statistics without suggesting how individuals might prepare for future changes in immigration policy.

Emotionally and psychologically, the article does not empower readers nor provide them with a sense of hope regarding their situations as foreign residents. Instead, it presents numbers that may evoke concern without offering constructive ways to address those concerns.

Finally, there are elements of clickbait as it uses dramatic figures (like record highs) but fails to deliver substantial insights beyond mere reporting.

Overall, while the article shares important data about foreign residents and illegal residency in Japan, it misses opportunities to guide readers effectively through actionable steps and deeper understanding. To find better information on navigating immigration issues in Japan, individuals could consult official government websites like Japan's Immigration Services Agency or seek advice from legal experts specializing in immigration law.

The text states, "The Japanese government aims to eliminate the issue of visa overstays entirely." This phrase can suggest a strong commitment from the government, which may lead readers to believe that the issue is being effectively addressed. However, it does not provide any evidence or details on how this goal will be achieved. This lack of information could mislead readers into thinking that significant progress is being made when it may not be.

When discussing illegal residency, the text mentions "71,229 foreigners staying in Japan without proper documentation." The term "foreigners" can create a sense of otherness and separation from Japanese citizens. This word choice might evoke negative feelings toward these individuals by framing them as outsiders rather than people who are part of the community.

The report states there was a decrease in illegal residents by "about 3,634 individuals or 4.9 percent compared to six months prior." While this sounds positive, it does not clarify whether this decrease is significant in relation to overall numbers or if it reflects an ongoing problem. The way this information is presented could lead readers to feel reassured about immigration issues without understanding the broader context.

In mentioning that "the largest group among those overstaying their visas is Vietnamese nationals with 13,070 individuals," there may be an implication that Vietnamese people are more likely to overstay their visas than others. This could reinforce stereotypes about specific ethnic groups and create bias against them without providing a balanced view of all nationalities involved in visa overstays.

The phrase "reflects a decrease" uses language that softens the reality of illegal residency. It suggests progress while downplaying the serious nature of people living without proper documentation. This wording can mislead readers into thinking that the situation is improving significantly when many still remain undocumented.

Lastly, stating that Chinese residents are "the largest group" among foreign nationals can imply dominance or preference over other groups. It highlights one nationality while potentially minimizing others' contributions or presence in Japan. Such emphasis might lead readers to perceive foreign residents through a lens of competition rather than coexistence within society.

The text conveys several meaningful emotions that shape the reader's understanding of the situation regarding foreign residents in Japan. One prominent emotion is pride, reflected in the statement about the record high number of foreign residents, which emphasizes a sense of achievement for Japan as it embraces diversity. The phrase "record high" suggests a positive milestone, evoking feelings of accomplishment and growth within society. This pride serves to foster a sense of unity and progress, encouraging readers to view the increase in foreign residents as a beneficial development for Japan.

Conversely, there is an underlying tone of concern or worry regarding illegal residency. The mention of 71,229 foreigners without proper documentation introduces an element of fear about immigration issues. The specific figure and its comparison to previous statistics highlight a serious problem that requires attention. This emotional weight aims to evoke sympathy for those affected by visa overstays while simultaneously urging readers to consider the implications for national policy and security.

Additionally, there is a hint of urgency associated with the government's goal to eliminate visa overstays entirely. This ambition can inspire action among readers who may feel compelled to support measures aimed at addressing immigration challenges. By framing this objective as essential for societal well-being, it encourages individuals to think critically about their own views on immigration and possibly advocate for change.

The writer employs emotional language strategically throughout the text to enhance its persuasive impact. Words like "record high," "decrease," and "aims" are chosen not only for their factual accuracy but also for their ability to evoke strong feelings related to success or failure in managing immigration policies. The use of comparative phrases—such as highlighting specific nationalities among foreign residents—serves both informational and emotional purposes by creating relatable narratives around individual groups while emphasizing their significance within broader societal dynamics.

Overall, these emotions guide readers' reactions by fostering sympathy towards individuals facing challenges due to illegal residency while simultaneously instilling pride in Japan's growing multicultural landscape. Through careful word choice and evocative phrases, the writer effectively steers attention toward critical issues surrounding immigration policy, ultimately aiming not just to inform but also motivate readers toward thoughtful engagement with these complex topics.