This summer, two Chinese films, "Dead To Rights" and "731," have sparked strong reactions among viewers by revisiting the dark events of World War II in Asia, particularly the Nanking massacre and Japan's Unit 731, known for conducting horrific experiments on civilians. These films have prompted many, especially younger audiences, to reflect on a painful legacy that continues to influence Chinese national identity and foreign policy.

The year marks the 80th anniversary of China's victory in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, which began in 1931 and resulted in over 35 million deaths. The Nanking massacre occurred in December 1937 when Japanese forces took control of Nanking (now Nanjing) and killed more than 300,000 people. For many Chinese citizens, this event is not just a historical tragedy but a deep moral wound that remains unacknowledged by Japan.

Japanese leaders often visit Yasukuni Shrine, where war criminals are honored alongside other war dead. When apologies from Japan do occur, they tend to be vague and are frequently contradicted by revisionist statements. This lack of genuine remorse is seen as both diplomatically offensive and a betrayal of historical truth by many in China.

Original article

The article provides an analysis of the impact of two Chinese films on viewers and their reflection on historical events. It does not offer any immediate actionable information or steps that readers can take. There are no tools or resources mentioned that could be utilized by the audience.

Educationally, the article provides a decent depth of knowledge. It explains the historical context of the films, the Nanking massacre, and Japan's Unit 731, offering a glimpse into the causes and consequences of these events. It also sheds light on the ongoing tensions between China and Japan regarding the acknowledgment and apology for these historical tragedies. However, it does not delve into more complex historical analyses or provide extensive educational resources for further learning.

In terms of personal relevance, the article connects to readers who are interested in history, international relations, or have a personal connection to the events depicted in the films. It highlights how historical events continue to influence national identities and foreign policies, which could be relevant to those studying or working in these fields. However, for the average reader, the personal relevance may be limited, especially if they have no direct connection to the historical events or the countries involved.

The article does not serve an immediate public service function by providing official warnings or emergency contacts. It does not aim to educate the public on safety measures or offer any practical tools for personal protection or preparedness.

The advice or guidance provided in the article is more of an observation and analysis of the films' impact and the ongoing diplomatic tensions. While it offers an insightful perspective, it does not provide clear, actionable advice that readers can implement in their daily lives.

In terms of long-term impact, the article contributes to a broader understanding of historical events and their legacies. It encourages readers to reflect on the past and its influence on the present, which could potentially lead to more informed and empathetic perspectives. However, it does not offer specific strategies or plans for long-term personal or societal change.

Psychologically, the article may evoke strong emotions, especially for those with a personal connection to the historical events. It could prompt readers to engage in further research or discussions, fostering a deeper understanding of the issues. However, it may also leave some readers feeling frustrated or upset, especially if they seek more concrete actions or resolutions.

The language used in the article is relatively neutral and does not appear to be driven by clickbait or sensationalism. It presents a balanced analysis without excessive dramatic or shocking language.

While the article provides an insightful commentary, it could have been enhanced by including more practical steps or resources for readers interested in learning more. For instance, it could have suggested reputable historical websites, documentaries, or books for further exploration. It could also have provided a list of organizations or initiatives working towards reconciliation and peace between China and Japan, offering readers a chance to engage actively with these issues.

The text describes a situation where historical events, specifically the atrocities committed during World War II in Asia, continue to impact the present-day relationships and identities of communities and families. The films "Dead To Rights" and "731" serve as a reminder of these painful legacies, prompting reflection and discussion among viewers, especially the younger generation.

The lack of acknowledgment and genuine remorse from certain leaders, as evidenced by their visits to shrines honoring war criminals, undermines the trust and respect that are essential for peaceful coexistence and community cohesion. This behavior not only betrays historical truth but also erodes the moral foundation upon which families and communities are built. When leaders fail to uphold their duty to acknowledge and atone for past wrongs, it creates a rift within the community, hindering the process of healing and reconciliation.

The absence of sincere apologies and the revisionist statements that follow further exacerbate this issue. Such actions not only offend and alienate those who have suffered but also send a message to the younger generation that historical truth and moral responsibility are negotiable. This can lead to a breakdown of trust within families and communities, as the younger generation may struggle to reconcile their understanding of history with the actions of their elders.

The Nanking massacre, with its devastating impact on the Chinese population, is a stark reminder of the vulnerability of the innocent and the duty of communities to protect their most vulnerable members. When such atrocities are not acknowledged or addressed adequately, it can create a sense of powerlessness and distrust within families, especially among those who have inherited the trauma of their ancestors.

The survival and continuity of a community depend on the ability to care for and protect its members, especially the children and the elderly. When historical traumas are left unaddressed or are denied, it can lead to a sense of disconnection and a lack of shared purpose, weakening the bonds that hold families and communities together.

If these behaviors and ideas, which prioritize identity politics and revisionist narratives over truth and accountability, continue to spread unchecked, the consequences for families and communities will be dire. The erosion of trust and the breakdown of kinship bonds will lead to a fragmented society, where the protection and care of the vulnerable are compromised. This, in turn, will threaten the very survival of the community, as the ability to procreate and raise the next generation in a safe and nurturing environment is undermined.

The ancestral duty to protect life and ensure the continuity of the people demands that we address these historical wrongs with honesty and accountability. Only then can we rebuild the trust and responsibility that are essential for the survival and prosperity of our families and communities.

"For many Chinese citizens, this event is not just a historical tragedy but a deep moral wound that remains unacknowledged by Japan."

This sentence shows cultural bias towards China. It emphasizes the perspective of Chinese citizens, presenting their view as the only valid one. The use of "deep moral wound" evokes strong emotions and implies that Japan's lack of acknowledgment is a moral failing. This phrasing favors China's national identity and foreign policy narrative. By focusing solely on the Chinese perspective, it excludes other viewpoints, creating a biased representation of historical events.

The text evokes a range of emotions, primarily centered around sadness, anger, and a sense of moral indignation. These emotions are woven throughout the narrative, serving to highlight the ongoing impact of historical events on present-day relations and perceptions.

Sadness is a pervasive emotion in the text, particularly when discussing the Nanking massacre and the high death toll of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression. The use of phrases like "deep moral wound" and "historical tragedy" emphasizes the enduring sorrow felt by Chinese citizens, transforming a historical event into a personal and collective trauma. This sadness serves to create empathy and a sense of shared grief, encouraging readers to connect with the Chinese perspective and understand the weight of this legacy.

Anger is another prominent emotion, directed at Japan's perceived lack of remorse and the honoring of war criminals. The text describes Japanese leaders' visits to the Yasukuni Shrine as "diplomatically offensive," indicating a strong sense of injustice and resentment. This anger is further fueled by Japan's vague apologies and revisionist statements, which are seen as a betrayal of historical truth. By evoking anger, the text aims to provoke a strong reaction, potentially inspiring readers to question Japan's actions and their impact on China's national identity and foreign policy.

Moral indignation, a powerful blend of anger and sadness, is also evident. The text implies that Japan's actions are not only offensive but also morally wrong, especially given the scale of the atrocities committed. This moral outrage serves to reinforce the idea that Japan's behavior is not just a diplomatic issue but a matter of fundamental right and wrong. It adds a layer of moral judgment to the historical narrative, shaping readers' perceptions and potentially influencing their opinions on contemporary issues.

To persuade readers, the writer employs several rhetorical devices. One notable strategy is the use of vivid and emotive language, such as describing the Nanking massacre as a "deep moral wound" and Japan's actions as "revisionist statements." These words are carefully chosen to evoke strong emotional responses, painting a picture of injustice and moral turpitude.

Additionally, the text repeats certain ideas, such as the lack of genuine remorse from Japan, to emphasize the ongoing nature of the issue and to create a sense of frustration and dissatisfaction with the status quo. By repeating these themes, the writer reinforces the emotional impact and guides readers towards a shared understanding of the Chinese perspective.

Overall, the text skillfully employs emotion to shape readers' perceptions, creating a narrative that is both compelling and persuasive. By evoking sadness, anger, and moral indignation, the writer aims to influence readers' opinions, potentially inspiring them to reflect on the ongoing impact of historical events and the importance of acknowledging and addressing past wrongs.