Taiwan has officially been classified as a "super-aged society," with over 20.06% of its population aged 65 and older as of December 2025. This demographic milestone indicates that approximately 4,673,155 individuals fall into this age category, meeting the World Health Organization's criteria for such a classification. The total population of Taiwan is recorded at 23,299,132, reflecting a decline of 101,088 from the previous year.

The country faces significant demographic challenges due to both an aging population and declining birth rates. In December alone, there were only 9,027 newborns registered—a decrease of approximately 27% compared to December 2024—contributing to an annual total of about 107,812 births for the year. This marks the lowest number of births recorded in Taiwan's history and continues a trend observed over the past decade.

The crude birth rate was reported at approximately 4.56 per thousand people annually in December. Factors contributing to this decline include women marrying later in life and opting for smaller families or remaining single due to rising living costs and inadequate childcare support.

In addition to these trends in birth rates, Taiwan reported a total of around 200,268 deaths last year with a crude death rate calculated at about 8.58 per thousand individuals. The demographic breakdown reveals that children aged between zero and fourteen years comprise approximately 11.51% of the population while those aged between fifteen and sixty-four account for about 68.43%.

Marriage statistics also indicate a decline; there were around104,376 marriages registered in the previous year—a decrease from earlier years—while divorces numbered about52,101 couples.

Local government data shows that Taipei City has the highest percentage of elderly residents at approximately 24.18%, with other municipalities like Kaohsiung and Tainan also reporting significant elderly populations exceeding twenty percent.

These demographic shifts highlight ongoing trends affecting Taiwan's society and economy as it adapts to an increasingly aging population alongside declining birth rates. In response to these challenges, government measures are being proposed aimed at increasing birth rates through expanded access to assisted reproduction services for single women and married same-sex couples among other initiatives focused on health promotion and care reform.

Original Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (taiwan)

The article provides a detailed overview of Taiwan's demographic changes, particularly its transition to a super-aged society. However, when evaluating its usefulness for a normal reader, several points emerge.

Firstly, the article lacks actionable information. It does not provide clear steps or choices that readers can implement in their daily lives. There are no resources or tools mentioned that individuals can utilize to address the challenges posed by an aging population or declining birth rates. As such, it offers no immediate actions for readers to take.

In terms of educational depth, while the article presents various statistics about population demographics and trends, it does not delve into the underlying causes of these changes or their implications for society. The numbers presented are significant but lack context regarding why they matter or how they were derived. This superficial treatment limits the reader's understanding of the broader issues at play.

Regarding personal relevance, while demographic shifts affect societal structures and future planning in healthcare and social services, the information is somewhat distant for an individual reader unless they are directly involved in policy-making or elder care services. For most people, this information may not have immediate implications on their daily lives.

The public service function is minimal; although it highlights important demographic trends that could inform public policy and social services planning, it does not provide warnings or guidance that would help individuals act responsibly in light of these changes.

There is also a lack of practical advice within the article. Without concrete steps or tips on how to navigate these demographic shifts—whether through personal planning for retirement, healthcare considerations as one ages, or community engagement—the content falls short of being truly helpful.

In terms of long-term impact, while understanding demographic trends can be beneficial for future planning at societal levels (such as infrastructure development), there are no suggestions provided that would help an individual plan ahead effectively regarding their own life circumstances.

Emotionally and psychologically speaking, while the statistics may evoke concern about aging populations and declining birth rates—potentially creating feelings of fear regarding future societal stability—the article offers no constructive thinking or solutions to alleviate such concerns.

Lastly, there is no use of clickbait language; however, it lacks depth and substance necessary to engage readers meaningfully beyond mere recitation of facts.

To add value where this article falls short: individuals can proactively prepare for an aging society by considering their own health needs as they age—such as maintaining regular medical check-ups and engaging in healthy lifestyle choices like exercise and balanced nutrition. It’s also wise to think about financial planning early on; setting aside savings specifically designated for healthcare costs later in life can ease potential burdens down the road. Engaging with local community resources focused on elder care could also provide insights into available support systems as one ages. Additionally, fostering intergenerational relationships can create stronger community ties that benefit both younger and older generations alike. These approaches offer practical ways to navigate potential challenges posed by demographic shifts without relying solely on external data sources.

The text states, "Taiwan has officially become a super-aged society." The term "super-aged" is a strong label that emphasizes the seriousness of Taiwan's aging population. This word choice can evoke concern and urgency, which may lead readers to feel that this is a crisis needing immediate attention. By using such a strong descriptor, the text may influence how readers perceive the implications of an aging society without providing deeper context about potential solutions or adaptations.

The phrase "record low of 107,812" births in 2025 suggests a significant decline in population growth. This wording can create alarm and imply negative consequences for society without discussing possible reasons for this trend or its broader implications. The focus on "record low" frames the situation as dire, potentially leading to fear about Taiwan's future demographics rather than presenting it as part of a natural demographic shift.

When mentioning that there were "around 104,376 marriages registered—a decrease from previous years," the text implies that fewer marriages are inherently negative. This framing could lead readers to believe that declining marriage rates are problematic without exploring cultural shifts or changing societal norms regarding marriage. It presents one side of the issue while neglecting any positive aspects or reasons behind this change.

The statement about deaths includes "a crude death rate of 8.58 per thousand individuals." While this statistic provides factual information, it lacks context regarding what constitutes an average death rate globally or historically for Taiwan. Without comparative data, readers might misinterpret whether this rate is alarming or typical for an aging population.

The mention of “approximately 4,673,155 people aged sixty-five and older” emphasizes the large number of elderly individuals in Taiwan but does not address their contributions to society or potential benefits they bring. This selective focus could lead to a perception that older adults are merely burdens on resources rather than valued members who enrich communities with experience and wisdom.

In discussing marriage and divorce rates with phrases like “a decrease from previous years,” there is no exploration into why these trends occur. This lack of analysis can mislead readers into thinking these changes are solely negative without considering evolving social dynamics or individual choices influencing these statistics.

The phrase “significant trends affecting Taiwan's society” suggests urgency but does not specify what those trends entail beyond demographics. By being vague here, it creates an impression that there are critical issues at play without offering concrete examples or solutions being implemented to address them. This ambiguity may foster anxiety over societal changes while lacking clarity on actionable responses.

Overall, while providing statistics about births and deaths paints a picture of demographic shifts in Taiwan, it often leans towards alarmist language without sufficient context to balance those concerns with potential positives or explanations for these trends.

The text conveys a range of emotions that reflect the significant demographic changes occurring in Taiwan. One prominent emotion is sadness, which emerges from the statistics indicating a declining population and record low birth rates. Phrases such as "decline of 101,088 people" and "total annual births for 2025 reached a record low of 107,812" evoke a sense of loss and concern about the future. This sadness serves to highlight the challenges Taiwan faces as it transitions into a super-aged society, prompting readers to empathize with the implications for families and communities.

Another emotion present is worry, particularly regarding the aging population. The statement that over 20% of the population is aged 65 and older creates an urgent tone about healthcare and social services needs. The mention of "significant trends affecting Taiwan's society" suggests that these demographic shifts could lead to serious consequences if not addressed properly. This worry encourages readers to consider how these changes might impact their own lives or those of their loved ones.

Pride can also be inferred from Taiwan's achievement in becoming recognized as a super-aged society by international standards. While this may seem like an accomplishment, it carries an underlying tension due to its implications; pride in societal development contrasts sharply with concerns about sustainability and support for older citizens. This duality invites readers to reflect on both achievements and challenges simultaneously.

The writer employs emotional language strategically throughout the text to guide reader reactions effectively. Words like "officially," "record low," and "significant trends" are chosen not only for their factual content but also for their emotional weight—implying urgency or seriousness about the situation at hand. By presenting stark statistics alongside descriptive phrases, such as “approximately 4,673,155 people aged sixty-five and older,” the writer emphasizes both scale and immediacy.

Additionally, repetition plays a role in reinforcing these emotions; references to declining birth rates appear multiple times throughout the text, underscoring its importance while building anxiety around future societal stability. The use of comparative phrases—like contrasting current birth rates with previous years—serves to amplify feelings of concern regarding demographic shifts.

Overall, through careful word choice and structural techniques such as repetition and comparison, this analysis shapes how readers perceive Taiwan’s demographic situation—encouraging sympathy for those affected by aging trends while instilling worry about potential repercussions on healthcare systems and social structures. These emotional cues are designed not only to inform but also motivate readers toward understanding necessary actions or policy considerations needed in response to these pressing issues.