Nasdaq has announced the launch of nine new indexes, set to take effect on November 21, 2025. These indexes will be available through the Nasdaq Global Index Data Service (GIDS). The Nasdaq Europe Rising Dividend Achievers Index will track companies that have increased their dividend value over the past three and five years while also showing growth in earnings per share (EPS) over the last three years. Selection criteria include strong liquidity, high cash-to-debt ratios, low payout ratios, and ESG Risk Ratings. This index will consist of four sub-portfolios, each targeting 75 securities with a minimum of 50.

Additionally, the Nasdaq International Rising Dividend Achievers Index will focus on companies from developed markets outside of the United States that meet similar criteria regarding dividend increases and EPS growth. This index will also comprise four sub-portfolios with a target of 100 securities and a minimum of 75.

Data recipients can expect real-time information from GIDS regarding these indexes, including attributes such as instrument ID, instrument name, currency, frequency, financial product type, brand, and session ID. Alongside real-time tick messages, Nasdaq will provide directory messages that summarize equity index trading activity at the end of trading sessions and relay basic index information at the start of each day.

For more details about accessing components and weightings data for these new indexes or inquiries related to Nasdaq's index products, interested parties are encouraged to contact Nasdaq Index Data Sales or visit their Global Index Watch platform.

Original article

The article provides information about the launch of new indexes by Nasdaq, but it lacks actionable steps or clear guidance for a typical reader. While it details the characteristics of the indexes and their selection criteria, there is no direct advice on how individuals can utilize this information in their investment strategies or financial decisions.

In terms of educational depth, the article offers some insights into what makes up these indexes, such as dividend increases and earnings per share growth. However, it does not delve into why these factors are important for investors or how they might influence stock performance. The absence of numbers, charts, or statistics further limits its educational value.

Regarding personal relevance, the information may be significant to investors interested in dividend-paying stocks or those tracking market indices. However, for an average reader who does not actively engage with stock markets or investment strategies, the relevance is limited.

The public service function is minimal; while it informs readers about new financial products from Nasdaq, it does not provide warnings or safety guidance that would help individuals act responsibly in their financial dealings. The article reads more like a press release than a resource aimed at helping people make informed decisions.

Practical advice is lacking as well. Although it mentions contacting Nasdaq Index Data Sales for more information on index components and weightings data, there are no specific steps outlined that an ordinary reader could realistically follow to take advantage of this information.

The long-term impact of this article seems negligible since it focuses solely on an upcoming event without providing insights that would help readers plan ahead or improve their financial habits over time.

Emotionally and psychologically, the article does not evoke fear or anxiety but also fails to provide clarity or constructive thinking regarding investment opportunities related to these new indexes.

There are no signs of clickbait language; however, the content lacks substance beyond announcing new products without offering deeper context about their significance in broader market trends.

Missed opportunities include failing to explain how one might assess whether investing in companies within these indexes aligns with personal investment goals. A better approach could involve encouraging readers to research individual companies' performance metrics themselves and consider diversifying investments based on risk tolerance and market conditions.

To add real value that was absent from the original article: individuals interested in investing should start by educating themselves about different types of investments—stocks versus bonds versus mutual funds—and understand their own risk tolerance before making any decisions. They can also track economic indicators like interest rates and inflation rates that affect market performance over time. Additionally, consulting with a financial advisor can provide personalized guidance tailored to one's unique situation while ensuring informed decision-making regarding investments aligned with long-term goals.

The introduction of new financial indexes by Nasdaq, while seemingly a technical advancement in the realm of investment and economic growth, raises critical concerns about the implications for local communities and family structures. The focus on metrics such as dividend increases and earnings per share may prioritize corporate profitability over the well-being of individuals and families who depend on stable economic conditions for their survival.

In a society where financial performance is emphasized above all else, there is a risk that families will become increasingly detached from their local economies. The pursuit of high returns can lead to decisions that favor short-term gains over long-term community health. This detachment can fracture kinship bonds as individuals prioritize personal financial success over collective well-being, undermining trust and responsibility within families.

Moreover, the reliance on indices like those proposed by Nasdaq could shift responsibilities away from local stewardship to distant financial entities. When communities are governed by abstract economic measures rather than personal relationships and mutual support, there is a danger that essential duties—such as caring for children and elders—will be neglected. Families may find themselves pressured into economic dependencies on impersonal markets rather than nurturing interdependent relationships that have historically sustained them.

The emphasis on liquidity and cash flow can also exacerbate existing inequalities within communities. Those who are already vulnerable—children, elders, or economically disadvantaged families—may find themselves further marginalized as resources become concentrated in the hands of those able to navigate these complex financial landscapes effectively. This creates an environment where trust erodes; when community members feel they cannot rely on one another due to competitive pressures or economic instability, familial cohesion weakens.

Furthermore, if these trends continue unchecked, we risk diminishing birth rates as young people may feel disillusioned about their ability to provide for future generations amidst volatile market conditions. The social structures supporting procreative families could crumble under the weight of impersonal economic demands that do not align with nurturing environments conducive to raising children.

In essence, if such ideas proliferate without critical examination of their impact on family dynamics and community resilience, we will witness a decline in communal trust and responsibility. Families will struggle to uphold their duties toward one another; children yet unborn may face uncertain futures devoid of stability; community ties will fray under pressure; and stewardship of both land and resources will falter as individualistic pursuits overshadow collective care.

To counteract these trends requires renewed commitment at the local level: fostering strong kinship bonds through shared responsibilities; prioritizing care for vulnerable populations; ensuring that economic activities serve community needs rather than dictate them; encouraging practices that promote sustainable resource management rooted in ancestral wisdom. Only through such actions can we safeguard our future generations against the risks posed by unchecked financial ideologies while reinforcing our moral obligations toward one another within our clans.

The text uses the term "strong liquidity" without explaining what that means. This could lead readers to believe that all companies with strong liquidity are good investments, which is not always true. The wording suggests a positive trait but does not provide context about how liquidity affects a company's performance. This can mislead readers into thinking all companies meeting this criterion are equally favorable.

The phrase "high cash-to-debt ratios" is used to imply financial health, but it lacks detail on what constitutes a "high" ratio. Readers might assume that higher ratios always indicate better companies without understanding the nuances involved. This selective presentation of financial metrics can create an overly simplistic view of investment quality.

When discussing the Nasdaq Europe Rising Dividend Achievers Index, the text states it will track companies that have increased their dividend value over three and five years. This framing suggests these companies are inherently stable and reliable, which may not reflect their overall performance or risk factors. It presents a biased view by highlighting only positive aspects without mentioning potential downsides.

The mention of "ESG Risk Ratings" implies that companies with high ratings are socially responsible or ethical without providing evidence or context for these claims. This could lead readers to accept ESG ratings as universally beneficial without questioning their accuracy or impact on investment decisions. The wording promotes an idea of virtue signaling around corporate responsibility while omitting critical discussion.

The phrase “real-time information from GIDS” suggests transparency and immediacy in data delivery, which may create an impression of reliability and trustworthiness in Nasdaq's services. However, this does not address any potential limitations or inaccuracies in real-time data reporting. By emphasizing real-time access, the text may mislead readers into believing they will always receive complete and accurate information.

The use of “interested parties” when referring to those who might contact Nasdaq Index Data Sales creates a vague sense of inclusivity but lacks specificity about who these parties might be. It implies openness while potentially excluding smaller investors or individuals who may feel intimidated by such corporate language. This choice of words can obscure the reality that access to detailed index information might be limited for some groups.

In describing both indexes as focusing on “companies from developed markets,” there is an implicit bias toward favoring larger economies over emerging markets without justification for this preference. This framing could lead readers to undervalue opportunities in less developed regions simply because they are not included in these indexes. The language subtly promotes a worldview where established markets are seen as more legitimate or worthy investments than others.

By stating “data recipients can expect real-time information,” the text presumes reliability and accuracy in Nasdaq's offerings without acknowledging any past issues with data integrity or delays in reporting systems. Such wording can foster misplaced confidence among investors regarding the quality and timeliness of market data provided by Nasdaq, potentially leading them to make uninformed decisions based on assumed reliability.

When mentioning “basic index information at the start of each day,” there is no elaboration on what constitutes "basic." This vagueness allows for interpretation that could downplay important details investors need for informed decision-making while presenting an illusion of comprehensive support from Nasdaq’s services. The lack of clarity here may mislead users about what they should expect from daily updates.

The text conveys a sense of excitement and optimism regarding the launch of nine new indexes by Nasdaq, set to take effect on November 21, 2025. This emotion is evident in phrases such as "announced the launch" and "set to take effect," which suggest a forward-looking perspective filled with potential. The strength of this excitement can be considered moderate to strong, as it indicates significant developments in the financial market that could attract interest from investors and data recipients alike. This emotion serves to inspire action among readers, encouraging them to engage with these new indexes and explore opportunities for investment.

Additionally, there is an underlying sense of pride associated with Nasdaq's commitment to creating indexes that focus on companies demonstrating financial stability through increased dividend values and earnings per share growth. Words like "strong liquidity," "high cash-to-debt ratios," and "low payout ratios" reflect a careful selection process aimed at highlighting responsible investment choices. This pride is moderately strong; it reinforces Nasdaq's reputation as a leader in financial innovation while also instilling trust among prospective users of their index products.

The mention of ESG Risk Ratings introduces another layer of emotion—concern for social responsibility—which resonates with contemporary values surrounding environmental, social, and governance issues. By including these criteria, the text subtly appeals to readers' desire for ethical investing practices. The emotional weight here is moderate; it suggests that Nasdaq not only cares about financial returns but also about broader societal impacts.

The writer employs persuasive language throughout the text by using action-oriented phrases like "track companies" and "focus on companies," which create an active engagement feel rather than passive observation. This choice of words enhances emotional impact by making the reader feel involved in a dynamic process rather than merely receiving information passively.

Furthermore, repetition plays a role in emphasizing key ideas—such as the importance of dividend increases and EPS growth across different indexes—which reinforces their significance in guiding investment decisions. By consistently highlighting these criteria alongside real-time data availability from GIDS, the message becomes more compelling; it urges readers not only to consider these new offerings but also positions Nasdaq as an essential resource for informed decision-making.

In summary, emotions such as excitement, pride, and concern are woven throughout the text to guide reader reactions toward engagement with Nasdaq’s new indexes. These emotions help build trust while inspiring action among potential investors who may be drawn by both financial prospects and ethical considerations in their investment choices. The strategic use of persuasive language further enhances this emotional appeal, steering attention toward Nasdaq’s innovative offerings within a responsible framework.