EPWK Holdings Ltd. has announced a one-for-forty (1-40) reverse stock split of its Class A Ordinary Shares, effective November 17, 2025. This consolidation was approved by the company's board of directors on October 20, 2025, to comply with Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5550(a)(2) and maintain its listing on the Nasdaq.

Starting from the effective date, every 40 ordinary shares currently held by shareholders will automatically convert into one issued and outstanding ordinary share. Fractional shares will not be issued; instead, shareholders will receive one full share for any fractional entitlement. The par value of the shares will change from $0.0001 to $0.004, and the CUSIP number for the shares will be updated to G30905114.

The company's authorized share capital will be adjusted from $1 million divided into various classes of shares to $1 million divided into fewer Class A and Class B Ordinary Shares with an increased par value. Following this consolidation, total issued Class A ordinary shares are expected to decrease from approximately 144.5 million to about 3.6 million, while Class B shares are projected to reduce from around 3.6 million to approximately 88,899.

Currently trading at about $0.07 per share after a significant decline of nearly 99% over six months, EPWK Holdings faces financial challenges indicated by a current ratio of just 0.17 and a market capitalization of only $1.55 million. The company has received a delisting notification from Nasdaq due to its stock trading at or below $0.10 for ten consecutive days but has requested a hearing with Nasdaq regarding this matter.

In recent developments, EPWK Holdings closed a public offering that raised approximately $8 million through units priced at $0.33 each; these units include one Class A ordinary share and one warrant for an additional share at an exercise price of $0.3465. Additionally, the company plans to launch "EPWK Curated Goods," a bilingual e-commerce platform focusing on creative products within three months.

These actions reflect significant changes as EPWK navigates compliance issues while seeking growth opportunities amid ongoing financial difficulties.

Original Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

The article provides some actionable information regarding the reverse stock split of EPWK Holdings Ltd. It informs investors and stakeholders about the effective date of the split, changes in par value, and updates to the CUSIP number. However, it does not offer clear steps or instructions for what individuals should do in response to this announcement. While it mentions that those interested in becoming market makers can contact Nasdaq Trading Services, it lacks specific guidance for regular investors on how to navigate these changes.

In terms of educational depth, the article primarily presents basic facts without delving into why a reverse stock split occurs or its implications for share valuation and trading behavior. It does not explain concepts like reverse stock splits or their potential effects on investor sentiment and market perception, which would provide readers with a deeper understanding.

The personal relevance of this topic is limited; while it may impact shareholders of EPWK Holdings Ltd., many readers may not have any direct connection to this company or its shares. Therefore, unless someone is directly invested in EPWK, the information might not significantly affect their financial decisions or future planning.

Regarding public service function, while the article conveys important corporate news that could be relevant to shareholders and market participants, it does not provide official warnings or safety advice that would benefit a broader audience. It merely relays an announcement without adding context or actionable insights for general public welfare.

The practicality of advice is low; although there is mention of contacting Nasdaq Trading Services for those interested in becoming market makers, there are no clear actions provided for average investors who might need guidance on how to respond to a reverse stock split.

In terms of long-term impact, while understanding corporate actions like a reverse stock split can be beneficial for investors over time, this particular article does not offer insights that would help readers plan financially or make informed investment decisions moving forward.

Emotionally and psychologically, the article lacks elements that would empower readers. It doesn’t provide reassurance or strategies for dealing with potential confusion surrounding such corporate actions; instead, it simply states facts without fostering confidence among stakeholders.

Finally, there are no clickbait elements present; however, the article could have enhanced its value by including explanations about how such corporate actions typically affect share prices and investor behavior. A missed opportunity exists here: providing links to resources where readers could learn more about investing strategies related to reverse stock splits could have added significant value.

Overall, while the article delivers essential information regarding EPWK's corporate action announcement—such as dates and contact details—it falls short in providing actionable steps for regular investors and lacks educational depth necessary for comprehensive understanding. To find better information on navigating such changes in investments effectively, individuals could consult financial news websites like Bloomberg or seek advice from financial advisors who specialize in equity markets.

The announcement regarding EPWK Holdings Ltd.'s reverse stock split and related corporate actions raises significant concerns about the implications for local communities, particularly in terms of family cohesion, trust, and responsibility. Such financial maneuvers often prioritize shareholder value over the well-being of families and the community at large.

When companies engage in actions like reverse stock splits, they can create an atmosphere of uncertainty that affects not just investors but also employees and their families. The focus on market performance can overshadow the fundamental responsibilities that businesses have towards their workers—responsibilities that include providing stable employment and fostering a supportive environment for raising children. If companies prioritize short-term financial strategies over long-term stability, they risk fracturing family units by creating economic instability.

Moreover, as corporations become more detached from local communities through such financial practices, there is a danger of shifting responsibilities away from familial bonds to impersonal entities. This detachment diminishes the role of parents and extended kin in nurturing children and caring for elders. When economic pressures mount due to corporate decisions that do not consider community impact, families may find themselves forced into precarious situations where they cannot fulfill their duties to protect and raise future generations.

The emphasis on shareholder interests can lead to a culture where profit is prioritized over people—a culture that erodes trust within communities as individuals feel compelled to compete against one another rather than collaborate for mutual support. This competitive mindset undermines collective stewardship of resources essential for survival—land management practices may be neglected as individuals focus on personal gain rather than communal well-being.

Furthermore, when corporate decisions lead to job losses or reduced benefits, it places additional burdens on families already struggling with responsibilities towards children and elders. The resulting economic strain can fracture relationships within households as stress levels rise and resources dwindle.

If such behaviors continue unchecked—where corporate interests overshadow familial obligations—the consequences will be dire: families will struggle to maintain cohesion; children may grow up without adequate support systems; trust within neighborhoods will erode; and the stewardship of land will suffer as individualistic pursuits take precedence over communal care.

To counteract these trends, it is crucial for individuals within communities to reaffirm their commitments to one another—prioritizing local accountability over distant corporate interests. By fostering environments where personal responsibility is emphasized alongside shared duties towards vulnerable members of society—children and elders alike—we can work towards restoring balance within our kinship bonds.

Ultimately, if we allow these trends toward detachment from community needs to persist without challenge or correction, we risk losing not only our ability to nurture future generations but also our capacity for collective survival in an increasingly complex world.

The text mentions, "This action will also involve a change in the par value of the shares from $0.0001 to $0.004." This statement could mislead readers into thinking that the increase in par value is a positive change without explaining its implications. It does not clarify how this increase might affect shareholders or the company's financial health. By presenting this information without context, it may create an impression that this is beneficial when it could be detrimental.

The phrase "Investors and stakeholders are advised to stay informed about these changes" suggests a sense of urgency and importance around the corporate action. However, it does not specify what risks or negative impacts might arise from these changes. This wording can create an illusion of transparency while actually obscuring potential concerns that investors should consider.

When stating, "For those interested in becoming market makers for EPWK," the text implies exclusivity and opportunity without discussing any potential risks involved in such roles. This phrasing may entice individuals to pursue market-making positions without fully understanding the complexities or dangers associated with them. The language used here seems designed to promote engagement rather than provide balanced information.

The announcement describes the reverse stock split as a corporate action categorized as an "industry announcement." This term can make it sound routine and benign, downplaying any possible negative consequences for shareholders. By using neutral language like "industry announcement," it avoids addressing how such actions can often lead to decreased shareholder value or market instability.

The mention of contacting Nasdaq Trading Services at "+1 212 231 5100 for further information" serves as a call to action but lacks details on what kind of support or guidance investors might receive. This omission leaves readers uncertain about whether they will get helpful advice or simply more corporate jargon. It creates an impression of accessibility while potentially hiding a lack of substantive assistance available to investors navigating these changes.

The text regarding EPWK Holdings Ltd.'s reverse stock split contains several emotions that can be identified through the language used. One prominent emotion is concern, which arises from the announcement of a reverse stock split. This action often signifies that a company is struggling with its share price, leading to potential worries among investors about the company's financial health and future prospects. Phrases like "reverse stock split" and "change in par value" carry an underlying weight of anxiety, as they suggest significant alterations that could affect share valuation and trading dynamics.

Another emotion present in the text is urgency, particularly emphasized by the effective date of November 17, 2025. The specificity of this date creates a sense of immediacy for stakeholders who must prepare for these changes. The mention of contacting Nasdaq Trading Services at a specific phone number further underscores this urgency, encouraging potential market makers to act swiftly if they wish to engage with EPWK.

Additionally, there is an element of reassurance implied in the communication. By providing clear details about what will happen—such as the new CUSIP number and changes in par value—the message seeks to instill confidence among investors that they will have access to necessary information during this transition period. This reassurance serves to mitigate fears associated with uncertainty surrounding corporate actions.

The emotions expressed guide readers toward specific reactions: concern prompts vigilance regarding their investments; urgency encourages prompt action; and reassurance fosters trust in management's transparency during potentially tumultuous times. Together, these emotional cues aim not only to inform but also to influence how stakeholders perceive and respond to upcoming changes.

The writer employs persuasive techniques by choosing words that evoke strong feelings rather than neutral terms. For instance, using phrases like "impact," "effective," and "advised" adds gravity to the announcement while subtly urging readers to take notice and act accordingly. The structure of presenting clear facts alongside emotional undertones enhances engagement; it balances informative content with an emotional appeal that resonates with investors' concerns about their financial stakes.

In conclusion, through careful word choice and structured presentation of information, the text effectively communicates emotions such as concern, urgency, and reassurance. These emotions shape how readers interpret the corporate action's significance while guiding their responses—whether it be increased vigilance or proactive engagement with market opportunities related to EPWK Holdings Ltd.’s forthcoming changes.