WORK Medical Technology Group LTD (WOK) will implement a reverse stock split of its ordinary shares at a ratio of one-for-one hundred (1-100), effective on Tuesday, October 21, 2025. This action has been approved by the company's shareholders and board of directors to comply with Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5550(a)(2), which requires maintaining a minimum bid price per share.

As part of this reverse stock split, every one hundred shares of Class A and Class B ordinary shares will be consolidated into one share. The total number of outstanding Class A shares will decrease from approximately 96 million to about 960,000, while the total number of outstanding Class B shares will reduce from around 7.59 million to approximately 76,000. Any fractional shares resulting from this consolidation will be rounded up to the nearest whole share.

The par value of the Class A Ordinary Shares will increase from US$0.0005 to US$0.05 as part of this corporate action, and the CUSIP number for the shares will change to G9767H117. Post-split trading for the Class A ordinary shares will continue under the symbol “WOK.”

This strategic move is expected to stabilize the company's stock price and enhance its market position within the Nasdaq Capital Market. For further inquiries or to register as a market maker in WOK, interested parties can contact Nasdaq Trading Services at +1 212 231 5100 or Nasdaq Corporate Data Operations at +1 877 308 0523.

Original Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

The article provides some actionable information regarding the reverse stock split and changes to the par value of WORK Medical Technology Group LTD's shares. It specifies that shareholders should be aware of this change, which is set to take effect on October 21, 2025. However, it does not provide clear steps for what shareholders should do in response to this change or how they can prepare for it.

In terms of educational depth, the article lacks substantial explanation about why a reverse stock split might occur or its implications for shareholders beyond the basic facts. It does not delve into the reasons behind such corporate actions or their potential effects on stock value and investor sentiment.

The personal relevance of this announcement is limited primarily to current shareholders of WOK. For those individuals, understanding the implications of a reverse stock split and a change in par value could be crucial for their investment strategies. However, for readers who do not have any stake in WOK, this information may not hold significant importance.

Regarding public service function, while it provides contact numbers for Nasdaq Trading Services and Corporate Data Operations, it does not offer broader safety advice or emergency contacts that would typically help the public at large. The information seems more geared towards informing investors rather than serving as a public service.

When assessing practicality, while contacting Nasdaq Trading Services is straightforward enough for interested parties wanting more information about becoming market makers or understanding their investments better, there are no clear steps provided within the article itself that would guide an average reader through any necessary actions related to their investments.

The long-term impact of this announcement may affect current investors' decisions regarding holding or selling their shares as they navigate these changes; however, without additional context on potential future performance post-split, it's difficult to assess lasting benefits from this information alone.

Emotionally and psychologically speaking, the article does little to empower readers; it merely states facts without providing reassurance or guidance on how to handle potential concerns regarding their investments following such corporate actions.

Lastly, there are no elements of clickbait present in the article; it sticks closely to factual reporting without sensationalizing its content. However, there was a missed opportunity to educate readers further about what reverse stock splits mean in practical terms—such as how they can affect share price and investor confidence—and what steps investors might consider taking after such announcements.

To find better information on reverse stock splits and their implications for individual investors, one could look up financial education websites like Investopedia or consult with financial advisors who specialize in investment strategies related to corporate actions like these.

The announcement regarding WORK Medical Technology Group LTD's reverse stock split and changes in share par value reflects a corporate maneuver that, while perhaps beneficial to the company’s financial structure, raises significant concerns about its broader implications for local communities and kinship bonds. Corporate actions such as these often prioritize shareholder interests over the well-being of families and local relationships, potentially undermining the very fabric that supports community survival.

Firstly, such financial decisions can create an environment where economic pressures overshadow familial responsibilities. When companies engage in practices like reverse stock splits, they may be attempting to manipulate share prices or consolidate ownership, which can lead to instability in employment and economic security for families. This instability can fracture trust within communities as individuals become more focused on personal financial survival rather than collective well-being. The emphasis on corporate profitability over community stability risks diminishing the natural duties of parents and extended kin to nurture children and care for elders.

Moreover, when corporations shift their focus away from local engagement towards distant market strategies, they inadvertently foster dependencies on impersonal systems rather than nurturing local stewardship. Families may find themselves relying on external entities for support instead of fostering resilience through their own networks. This reliance can weaken the bonds of responsibility that tie families together—parents may feel compelled to prioritize work obligations over family needs, leading to neglect of child-rearing duties or elder care.

The change in par value also suggests a potential distancing from grassroots accountability; it signals a move towards abstract financial metrics rather than tangible community health indicators. Such shifts can erode trust among neighbors who might otherwise collaborate to support one another through shared resources or mutual aid systems. The focus becomes less about caring for one another’s welfare and more about navigating complex corporate structures that do not recognize individual familial needs.

Furthermore, if these corporate behaviors spread unchecked within communities—encouraging a culture where profit is prioritized over people—the long-term consequences could be dire: diminished birth rates as young families struggle with economic insecurity; increased vulnerability among children and elders left without adequate support; erosion of communal trust as individuals retreat into self-preservation mode; and ultimately a failure in land stewardship as disconnected entities exploit resources without regard for future generations.

In conclusion, while corporate maneuvers like those described may yield short-term benefits for shareholders or executives, they pose significant risks to family cohesion and community integrity. If such ideas proliferate unchecked, we could witness a decline in procreative continuity essential for survival—a weakening of our collective duty to protect life at all stages—and an abandonment of our ancestral commitment to nurture both our kin and the land we inhabit. It is imperative that individuals reclaim personal responsibility within their communities by prioritizing local relationships over distant corporate interests—renewing commitments to family duties that ensure not only survival but thriving futures for generations yet unborn.

The text uses the phrase "reverse stock split at a ratio of one-for-one hundred (1-100)" which might confuse some readers. This wording can make it seem like shareholders are gaining more value when, in reality, they are losing shares and potentially value. The language here can mislead people into thinking this is a positive change rather than a reduction in their ownership stake. It helps the company by framing the action in a way that sounds beneficial.

The statement "change in the par value of its Class A Ordinary Shares" uses technical jargon that may not be easily understood by all investors. This choice of words can create an impression that this is a normal and routine procedure, downplaying any potential negative impacts on shareholders. By using complex terms without explanation, it may obscure the real implications of these changes for less informed investors. This benefits those who understand such jargon while leaving others confused.

The announcement mentions "set to take effect on Tuesday, October 21, 2025," which implies certainty about future events without acknowledging potential risks or uncertainties involved with such corporate actions. This phrasing can lead readers to believe that everything will go as planned without considering possible complications or negative outcomes for shareholders. It presents an overly optimistic view that could mislead stakeholders about what to expect.

The text states "interested parties can contact Nasdaq Trading Services," suggesting an openness and willingness to engage with stakeholders. However, it does not specify whether these inquiries will lead to meaningful dialogue or just serve as a formality. This could create an illusion of transparency while potentially hiding any lack of genuine communication from the company regarding shareholder concerns. The wording here may help maintain a positive image for Nasdaq while not truly addressing stakeholder needs.

When discussing market makers and trading services, there is no mention of potential risks associated with trading after such changes occur. By omitting this information, it presents only one side—the idea that engaging with these services is beneficial—while ignoring possible downsides for investors who might be affected by volatility or reduced liquidity post-split. This selective focus helps promote trading activity without fully informing investors about what they might face after these changes are implemented.

The use of specific numbers like "US$0.0005" raised to "US$0.05" emphasizes the increase in par value but does not clarify how this affects overall share value or investor equity directly after the split occurs. By highlighting only the increase without context regarding its impact on existing shares' worth, it creates an impression that this change is inherently good for shareholders when it may not be so straightforward upon implementation. The emphasis on numbers serves to distract from potential losses faced by investors due to dilution effects from the reverse stock split.

The text regarding WORK Medical Technology Group LTD's reverse stock split and changes to its Class A Ordinary Shares conveys a mix of emotions, primarily focusing on concern and urgency. The announcement of a reverse stock split, particularly at a ratio of one-for-one hundred, can evoke anxiety among investors. This emotion is implied through the language used; terms like "reverse stock split" often carry negative connotations as they suggest a decrease in share value or company stability. The mention of changing the par value from US$0.0005 to US$0.05 further emphasizes this concern, as it indicates significant adjustments that could affect shareholder confidence.

The strength of this concern is moderate but palpable, serving to alert shareholders and potential investors about the significant changes taking place within the company. It suggests that stakeholders should be vigilant and consider how these changes might impact their investments. By framing the corporate action in such terms, the message aims to guide readers towards a reaction of caution or re-evaluation regarding their holdings in WOK.

Additionally, there is an underlying tone of urgency present in phrases like "set to take effect on Tuesday, October 21, 2025." This time-sensitive language heightens feelings of anxiety and prompts immediate attention from readers who may need to act quickly based on this information. The inclusion of contact numbers for Nasdaq Trading Services and Nasdaq Corporate Data Operations also serves to build trust by providing clear avenues for further inquiry or support; it implies that transparency exists around these changes.

The writer employs specific emotional triggers through careful word choice and phrasing that highlight the seriousness of the announcement without resorting to alarmist language. By stating facts clearly while hinting at potential implications for shareholders' investments, the text effectively steers readers toward a mindset where they feel compelled to seek more information or reconsider their positions regarding WOK shares.

Overall, these emotional elements work together not only to inform but also to persuade readers towards vigilance and proactive engagement with their investments in light of upcoming corporate actions. The combination of concern about value loss with an invitation for dialogue fosters an environment where stakeholders are encouraged both to reflect critically on their investment decisions and feel supported by available resources should they choose to reach out for assistance or clarification.