Nasdaq will begin listing two new GraniteShares exchange-traded funds (ETFs) on September 23, 2025. The ETFs are the GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF, with the ticker symbol MTYY, and the GraniteShares YieldBOOST PLTR ETF, with the ticker symbol PLYY.

Quotation and trade data for these ETFs will be disseminated through various platforms including UTP Level 1, Nasdaq Basic, Nasdaq Level 2, and Nasdaq TotalView-ITCH starting on their effective listing date. Daily valuation information for these ETFs will also be widely available through major index service providers.

Jane Street Capital, LLC has been designated as the liquidity provider for these new listings. Market makers interested in registering can contact Nasdaq Trading Services beginning on September 23.

All purchasers of the newly issued ETFs are required to receive a prospectus or product description prior to purchase. For further information or inquiries regarding trading services related to these listings, individuals can reach out to Nasdaq Trading Services at +1 212 231 5180 or via email at ETFs@Nasdaq Team.

Original article

The article provides some actionable information by announcing the upcoming listing of two new GraniteShares exchange-traded funds (ETFs) on September 23, 2025. It informs potential investors that they will need to receive a prospectus or product description before purchasing these ETFs, which is a clear step for anyone interested in investing. Additionally, it offers contact information for Nasdaq Trading Services, allowing individuals to reach out with inquiries about trading services related to these listings.

However, while the article mentions the liquidity provider and market makers' registration process, it lacks deeper educational content. It does not explain how ETFs work or why someone might consider investing in them. There are no historical insights or detailed explanations of market mechanisms that would help readers understand the significance of these new ETFs beyond their basic details.

In terms of personal relevance, the topic may matter to individuals interested in investing or those who already follow stock markets and financial news. However, for someone not engaged with investment strategies or financial markets, this announcement may not have immediate relevance.

The article does have a public service function by providing official contact details and requirements for purchasing the ETFs; however, it does not offer safety advice or emergency contacts that would typically be associated with public service articles.

Regarding practicality, while it gives some clear steps (like contacting Nasdaq Trading Services), it could be more useful if it included guidance on how to evaluate whether these ETFs are suitable investments based on individual financial situations.

The long-term impact is limited as well; while investing in ETFs can have lasting effects on one’s financial portfolio, the article does not provide any insights into long-term investment strategies or considerations that could benefit readers over time.

Emotionally and psychologically, the article does little to empower readers. It simply presents facts without offering encouragement or support regarding investment decisions. There are no elements designed to instill confidence in potential investors about navigating this new opportunity.

Finally, there is an absence of clickbait language; however, there is also a missed opportunity to educate readers further about ETF investments and their implications. The article could have included links to resources where individuals can learn more about ETF investing strategies or how to assess their own investment goals effectively.

In summary: - Actionable Information: Provides steps for contacting Nasdaq but lacks comprehensive guidance. - Educational Depth: Fails to teach about ETF mechanics or investment strategies. - Personal Relevance: Relevant mainly for those interested in finance; less so for others. - Public Service Function: Offers official contact info but lacks broader public safety advice. - Practicality of Advice: Some practical steps exist but lack depth. - Long-Term Impact: Limited insights into long-term investment benefits. - Emotional/Psychological Impact: Does not empower readers emotionally regarding investments. - Clickbait/Ad-driven Words: No clickbait present but misses educational opportunities.

To improve understanding and engagement with this topic, readers could look up trusted financial websites like Investopedia for detailed explanations of ETFs and their benefits before considering an investment decision. Additionally, consulting with a financial advisor could provide personalized insight into whether these specific ETFs align with individual goals.

The introduction of new exchange-traded funds (ETFs) such as the GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF and the GraniteShares YieldBOOST PLTR ETF, while appearing to be a financial innovation, raises critical questions about their impact on local kinship bonds and community survival. The focus on financial instruments can often divert attention from the fundamental responsibilities that families have toward one another, particularly in nurturing children and caring for elders.

In a society increasingly driven by market mechanisms, there is a risk that families may prioritize financial gain over the essential duties of raising children and supporting vulnerable members. The emphasis on trading and market-making can create an environment where economic interests overshadow personal relationships. This shift could lead to diminished family cohesion as individuals become more focused on individual financial success rather than collective well-being.

Moreover, reliance on entities like Jane Street Capital as liquidity providers may foster a sense of dependency on external forces rather than encouraging local stewardship. When communities look to distant organizations for support or stability, they risk eroding trust within familial structures. This detachment can weaken the natural bonds that hold families together—bonds built on mutual care, responsibility, and shared values.

The requirement for purchasers of these ETFs to receive prospectuses before buying suggests an increasing complexity in financial transactions that may alienate those who are less financially literate. This complexity could further fracture family dynamics by creating barriers to understanding important economic decisions that affect their lives. If parents struggle to navigate these systems alone, it places additional burdens on children who must then assume roles beyond their years in managing family affairs.

Additionally, if families become preoccupied with navigating these new financial landscapes at the expense of direct engagement with one another—such as sharing meals or participating in communal activities—their ability to nurture future generations is compromised. Children require stable environments filled with love and guidance; when parents are distracted by market fluctuations or investment strategies instead of focusing on familial duties, it undermines their role as caregivers.

The long-term consequences of allowing such behaviors to proliferate unchecked are dire: families may become fragmented; trust within communities could erode; children may grow up without strong parental figures or stable home environments; elders might be neglected as younger generations chase fleeting economic opportunities instead of honoring their caregiving responsibilities. Ultimately, this shift threatens not only individual families but also the very fabric of community life—a fabric woven from shared experiences and mutual support.

In conclusion, if society continues down this path where financial markets take precedence over familial obligations and local stewardship diminishes under external influences, we risk losing sight of what truly sustains us: our commitment to protecting life through nurturing relationships and responsible land care. The survival of our people depends not merely on wealth accumulation but fundamentally upon our dedication to each other—our kin—and our shared duty toward future generations.

The text uses the phrase "GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF" and "GraniteShares YieldBOOST PLTR ETF" which sounds very technical and financial. This language may make it seem like investing in these ETFs is more complex or sophisticated than it really is. This could lead readers to feel that they need special knowledge or skills to understand these products, potentially discouraging average investors from participating. The complexity in terminology can create a barrier, favoring those already familiar with financial markets.

The text states that "Jane Street Capital, LLC has been designated as the liquidity provider for these new listings." This wording implies a level of credibility and trustworthiness associated with Jane Street Capital without providing any context about who they are or their reputation. By not explaining what being a liquidity provider entails, it may mislead readers into thinking this company has an unblemished record or is universally respected in the industry, which may not be true for all audiences.

The phrase "All purchasers of the newly issued ETFs are required to receive a prospectus or product description prior to purchase" suggests that there is a strong regulatory framework ensuring consumer protection. However, this could also imply that potential buyers might not fully understand what they are purchasing unless they read these documents. This framing can create a false sense of security about the safety of investing in these ETFs while downplaying the risks involved.

When stating "Daily valuation information for these ETFs will also be widely available through major index service providers," it presents an image of transparency and accessibility. However, using terms like “widely available” can be misleading as it does not specify how easily accessible this information truly is for average investors compared to institutional ones. This choice of words can lead readers to believe that all necessary information will be readily at hand when it might actually require effort to obtain.

The mention of Nasdaq Trading Services contact details at the end serves as an invitation for inquiries but subtly positions Nasdaq as an authority on trading services related to these listings. By providing only one source for further questions, it limits perspectives on trading services and reinforces Nasdaq's dominance in this area without presenting alternative viewpoints or options available elsewhere. This creates an impression that Nasdaq holds exclusive expertise on this matter.

The text regarding the new GraniteShares exchange-traded funds (ETFs) conveys a sense of excitement and anticipation, particularly through phrases that highlight the upcoming listing date and the involvement of a recognized liquidity provider. The announcement of two new ETFs, with specific ticker symbols and a designated launch date, creates an atmosphere of enthusiasm for investors and market participants. This excitement is evident in the straightforward presentation of information about the ETFs, which emphasizes their novelty and potential appeal to investors looking for new opportunities.

The strength of this emotion can be considered moderate to strong, as it serves to engage readers who may be interested in trading or investing. By presenting these ETFs as fresh options in the market, the text encourages readers to consider them seriously. The mention of Jane Street Capital as the liquidity provider adds an element of trustworthiness; it suggests reliability and stability in trading these new products. This choice of words fosters confidence among potential investors, making them more likely to explore these offerings.

Additionally, there is an underlying sense of urgency conveyed through phrases like "begin listing" and "contact Nasdaq Trading Services beginning on September 23." This urgency prompts action from readers who may want to get involved early or seek further information about these investments. The requirement for purchasers to receive a prospectus or product description before buying also implies responsibility on both sides—encouraging informed decision-making while reinforcing trust between Nasdaq and its audience.

The language used throughout this announcement avoids overly emotional or sensationalist terms; instead, it maintains a professional tone that reflects seriousness while still invoking positive feelings about investment opportunities. By focusing on factual details such as ticker symbols and listing dates without embellishing them excessively, the writer effectively communicates important information while subtly guiding reader emotions toward optimism about future financial prospects.

In summary, this text utilizes excitement and trust-building elements strategically to engage potential investors. The careful choice of words enhances emotional impact by creating anticipation around new investment opportunities while fostering confidence in their viability through established partnerships like that with Jane Street Capital. Overall, these emotional cues are designed not only to inform but also to inspire action among readers who may wish to participate in trading these newly listed ETFs.