Shizuoka Prefecture's Shimoda City has reported a significant increase in visitors to its beaches this season, with Shirahama Ohama Beach experiencing an 80 percent rise compared to the previous year. A total of 264,320 people visited the ten beaches during the summer of 2025, marking an increase of approximately 60,000 visitors from 2024. Specifically, Shirahama Ohama attracted around 170,000 visitors.

The city's tourism division attributes this surge in attendance at Shirahama Ohama to favorable weather conditions during the holiday period and a rebound from temporary advisories related to the Nankai Trough that had negatively impacted visitor numbers in 2024. However, it was noted that the other nine beaches saw fewer visitors than in 2024, partly due to a shorter swimming season in 2025 caused by calendar changes.

Original article (summer)

The article provides some information about the increase in visitors to Shimoda City's beaches, particularly Shirahama Ohama Beach. However, it lacks actionable information that readers can use right now or soon. It does not offer clear steps, safety tips, or instructions for potential visitors.

In terms of educational depth, the article presents basic facts and figures regarding visitor numbers but does not explain the underlying reasons for these changes in attendance beyond mentioning favorable weather and previous advisories. There is no deeper exploration of how these factors impact tourism or local economies.

Regarding personal relevance, while the topic may interest those considering a visit to Shimoda City’s beaches, it does not significantly affect most readers' daily lives or decisions. It doesn’t provide insights that would influence spending habits or personal plans.

The article has limited public service function; it mentions advisories related to the Nankai Trough but does not provide current safety advice or emergency contacts that could be useful for beachgoers.

Practicality of advice is minimal since there are no specific tips or actionable steps provided for readers looking to visit the beaches. The information shared is more observational than prescriptive.

Long-term impact is also lacking as the article focuses on short-term trends without offering guidance on how to plan future visits effectively or consider broader implications for tourism in the area.

Emotionally, while it might evoke curiosity about beach visits due to increased attendance, it doesn't provide any supportive content that helps readers feel empowered or informed about their choices.

Finally, there are no signs of clickbait language; however, the article could have been more engaging by providing additional context about local attractions or activities available at these beaches during peak season.

To enhance its value, the article could have included practical travel tips for potential visitors (like best times to visit), details on amenities available at these beaches (such as parking and facilities), and links to official tourism websites for further planning resources. Readers interested in visiting could look up local tourism boards online or consult travel forums for firsthand experiences and recommendations.

The text uses the phrase "significant increase in visitors" which can create a strong positive feeling about the tourism in Shimoda City. This wording makes it seem like the rise is very important and beneficial, but it does not provide context about what this increase means for the local community or economy. By focusing on "significant," it may lead readers to overlook potential negative impacts or challenges that come with increased tourism, such as overcrowding or environmental concerns.

The statement "favorable weather conditions during the holiday period" suggests that this was a major reason for more visitors. However, this could mislead readers into thinking that weather alone caused the increase without considering other factors like marketing efforts or changes in local attractions. By emphasizing favorable weather, it downplays any other possible reasons for the rise in visitor numbers.

When mentioning "a rebound from temporary advisories related to the Nankai Trough," there is an implication that previous advisories were unjustified fears rather than legitimate safety concerns. This wording might make readers think those warnings were exaggerated and not based on real risks, which could misrepresent how serious those advisories were at the time. It shifts focus away from understanding why such advisories existed.

The text states that "the other nine beaches saw fewer visitors than in 2024." This comparison could mislead readers into thinking all beaches are equally affected by tourism trends without explaining why some beaches might have been less popular. It presents a one-sided view of beach attendance without exploring specific reasons behind these declines, making it seem like only Shirahama Ohama Beach benefited from increased interest.

By saying there was a "shorter swimming season in 2025 caused by calendar changes," it implies that external factors solely determined visitor numbers at other beaches. This phrasing can obscure any local management decisions or marketing strategies that may have also influenced attendance levels. It shifts blame away from potential shortcomings of beach management and places it entirely on uncontrollable calendar changes.

The phrase “approximately 60,000 visitors” gives an impression of precision while still being vague enough to hide exact figures and their implications fully. Using “approximately” softens the impact of what could be seen as a substantial number when compared to previous years’ data but does not clarify whether this number is good or bad relative to expectations for growth in tourism overall. This choice of words can lead readers to feel positively about growth without critically assessing its significance.

The text conveys a range of emotions that reflect the changing dynamics of tourism in Shimoda City, particularly at Shirahama Ohama Beach. A sense of excitement is evident in the reported 80 percent increase in visitors to this beach compared to the previous year. This excitement is underscored by the specific figure of around 170,000 visitors, which emphasizes a significant rebound and suggests a positive shift in public interest and engagement with the area. The strong presence of numbers serves to amplify this emotion, making it feel more tangible and impactful.

Conversely, there is an underlying tone of concern regarding the other nine beaches that experienced fewer visitors than in 2024. This concern arises from factors such as a shorter swimming season due to calendar changes and previous advisories related to the Nankai Trough that had affected visitor numbers. The mention of these advisories introduces a subtle hint of fear, as it implies potential risks associated with natural events that could deter future tourism. The writer's choice to highlight these challenges creates a contrast between the thriving Shirahama Ohama Beach and its less fortunate counterparts, evoking sympathy for those areas struggling with lower attendance.

These emotions guide readers’ reactions by creating a narrative that celebrates success while also acknowledging difficulties faced by other beaches. The excitement surrounding Shirahama Ohama Beach may inspire readers to visit or promote tourism in Shimoda City, while the concern for other beaches fosters empathy towards their situation. This duality encourages readers not only to appreciate what is going well but also to recognize areas needing support.

The writer employs emotional language effectively throughout the text; phrases like "significant increase" and "favorable weather conditions" evoke positivity and hopefulness about future tourism prospects. By contrasting this with terms like "fewer visitors" and "temporary advisories," which carry negative connotations, the author enhances emotional impact through juxtaposition. Such techniques draw attention to both achievements and challenges within Shimoda City's tourism landscape.

In summary, through careful word choice and emotional framing, the text persuades readers by celebrating successes while simultaneously addressing concerns about broader implications for local beaches. This approach not only informs but also engages readers on an emotional level, prompting them toward reflection on how they might contribute positively or respond thoughtfully to these developments in Shimoda City’s tourism scene.