N. Selvaraj, known as "Central Body Murugan," has spent 36 years retrieving bodies from the railway tracks at Chennai Central Railway Station. He began this work at age 15 and has since made the station his home and workplace. His duties involve handling mangled remains, sometimes reassembling them.

Murugan's work gained wider attention in 2014 following a bomb blast on a train at the station, where he was among the first responders. This led to him being recognized by political leaders, including a promise of a permanent job and steady salary in 2019, which has not yet materialized.

Currently, Murugan earns between ₹5,000 and ₹6,000 per month, with payments coming from the police, who receive funds from the railway for supplies like shroud cloth and body bags. His work is not officially recorded, meaning he receives no benefits, pension, or security for his family. Due to a shoulder injury from a recent accident, he now trains younger individuals to assist with the tasks, though he still steps in when needed.

Original article

Actionable Information: There is no actionable information for the reader. The article describes the work of an individual and does not provide steps or instructions that a normal person can follow.

Educational Depth: The article offers limited educational depth. It touches upon the difficult and often unacknowledged work of body retrieval and the systemic issues faced by those in such roles, like lack of official recognition and benefits. However, it does not delve into the "why" or "how" of these systems, nor does it provide historical context beyond the 2014 bomb blast.

Personal Relevance: The personal relevance is low for most readers. While it highlights a critical societal role and the challenges faced by individuals in such positions, it does not directly impact a reader's daily life, finances, safety, or family care in a practical way.

Public Service Function: The article serves a limited public service function. It brings attention to an individual performing a vital, albeit grim, task and the lack of support he receives. However, it does not offer official warnings, safety advice, or emergency contacts.

Practicality of Advice: There is no advice or steps given in the article, so its practicality cannot be assessed.

Long-Term Impact: The article has minimal long-term impact for the reader. It raises awareness about a specific situation but does not provide information or actions that would lead to lasting personal benefit or change.

Emotional or Psychological Impact: The article may evoke empathy and a sense of injustice regarding Murugan's situation. It highlights the dedication of an individual in a difficult job and the lack of recognition and support he has received. However, it does not offer solutions or ways for the reader to feel empowered or to contribute positively.

Clickbait or Ad-Driven Words: The article does not appear to use clickbait or ad-driven language. The tone is informative and descriptive of the individual's work and circumstances.

Missed Chances to Teach or Guide: The article missed opportunities to provide more value. It could have offered information on how individuals can support similar causes or workers, or provided resources for understanding the challenges faced by informal laborers in critical services. A normal person could find better information by researching organizations that support essential workers or by looking into government initiatives for unrecognized labor in their own region.

The reliance on an individual to perform such a critical, yet unacknowledged, duty weakens the fabric of community responsibility. When the care for the deceased, a solemn duty that traditionally binds families and neighbors, is outsourced to a single, under-supported person, it erodes the shared sense of obligation. This creates a dependency that bypasses the natural flow

The text uses strong words to describe Murugan's work, like "mangled remains" and "reassembling them." This makes his job sound very difficult and perhaps a bit gruesome. It helps people feel more sympathy for him and his situation.

The text highlights a broken promise from political leaders, saying a job offer "has not yet materialized." This suggests that the politicians are not keeping their word. It makes the government or those in power look unreliable.

The text mentions Murugan's low earnings of "₹5,000 and ₹6,000 per month" and the lack of benefits. This shows a class or money bias by pointing out how little he is paid for very difficult work. It makes his situation seem unfair compared to others who might have more stable jobs.

The text states his work "is not officially recorded." This phrasing implies a lack of recognition or formal acknowledgment of his important contributions. It suggests that the system is not properly valuing or documenting his efforts.

The text conveys a deep sense of sadness and pity for N. Selvaraj, known as "Central Body Murugan." This emotion is strongly felt when describing his 36 years of work retrieving bodies from railway tracks, a task that involves handling "mangled remains" and "reassembling them." The description of him starting this difficult job at just 15 years old, and making the station his home and workplace, evokes a feeling of profound empathy for a life dedicated to such grim and unacknowledged labor. This sadness is amplified by the lack of official recognition and benefits, such as a pension or security for his family, despite his crucial and dangerous work. The promise of a permanent job and salary made in 2019 that has "not yet materialized" adds to this sense of disappointment and injustice, further deepening the reader's sympathy.

The writer uses these emotions to guide the reader's reaction by creating a strong sense of sympathy and concern for Murugan's situation. The detailed account of his difficult and often gruesome work, coupled with the lack of formal support, is designed to make the reader feel for him and perhaps question the fairness of his circumstances. The emotional weight of his dedication and the stark reality of his current earnings and lack of benefits are presented to highlight a societal oversight. This emotional appeal aims to shift the reader's perspective from simply acknowledging his work to feeling a personal connection to his plight, potentially inspiring a desire for his situation to improve.

The writer persuades the reader by carefully choosing words that carry emotional weight. Phrases like "mangled remains" and "reassembling them" are not neutral descriptions but are intended to evoke a visceral reaction and underscore the difficulty and unpleasantness of his tasks. The contrast between his long-standing dedication and the unfulfilled promise of a stable job creates a narrative of hardship and neglect. The personal story of Murugan, beginning at a young age and continuing for decades, serves as a powerful tool to build an emotional connection. This narrative approach, focusing on an individual's sacrifice and the lack of commensurate reward, is more impactful than a simple statement of facts. By presenting his current meager earnings and the absence of benefits, the writer makes his situation sound more extreme and deserving of attention, thereby increasing the emotional impact and steering the reader's thinking towards recognizing the injustice of his situation.