The United Arab Emirates is using artificial intelligence to help the Arabic language grow and be used more around the world. Many government groups are creating projects that use AI in areas like writing, teaching, and making new content.

One big project is the Historical Dictionary of Arabic Language, which shows how the Arabic language has changed over time. A newer project, the "GPT Historical Dictionary of the Arabic Language," uses AI to share this language with more people. It has over 20 million Arabic words and lets people write, read, and even turn texts into videos. This is a partnership between the Arabic Language Academy in Sharjah and the Emirates Scholar Research Centre.

The Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Knowledge Foundation is also helping to share knowledge in Arabic. Their "Digital Knowledge Hub" is a place for digital content, and it now has over 800,000 titles and 8.5 million digital items.

In Abu Dhabi, the Arabic Language Centre has created AI-powered dictionaries. One is a special Arabic-English dictionary that uses AI and computer language skills. It includes more than 7,000 modern words with easy-to-understand definitions, examples, and pictures. They also worked with universities to create a large collection of Arabic reading material called the Balanced Arabic Readability Corpus project, which has 10 million words.

At a recent book fair, a "Digital Square" was introduced to help use AI more in publishing. Many schools are also starting programs to teach Arabic using AI and new technology.

Original article

Actionable Information: There is no actionable information provided for a general reader. The article describes projects and initiatives but does not offer steps or resources that an individual can directly use or engage with.

Educational Depth: The article provides some factual information about projects aimed at promoting the Arabic language through AI. It mentions specific initiatives like the Historical Dictionary of Arabic Language and the Digital Knowledge Hub, along with some statistics on word counts and digital items. However, it lacks depth in explaining *how* these AI tools work, the underlying systems, or the broader implications of AI in language preservation and dissemination. It states facts without providing deeper understanding or context.

Personal Relevance: The topic of AI being used to promote the Arabic language has limited direct personal relevance for a general reader unless they are specifically interested in the Arabic language, its history, or AI applications in linguistics. It does not directly impact daily life, finances, health, or safety for most individuals.

Public Service Function: The article does not serve a public service function. It is not providing warnings, safety advice, or emergency contacts. It is reporting on government and institutional initiatives rather than offering direct public assistance or tools.

Practicality of Advice: No advice or steps are given in the article, so the practicality of advice cannot be assessed.

Long-Term Impact: The article touches upon initiatives that could have a long-term impact on the preservation and global use of the Arabic language. However, it does not offer any guidance or actions for individuals to contribute to or benefit from these long-term impacts.

Emotional or Psychological Impact: The article is purely informative and does not aim to evoke any specific emotional or psychological response. It does not offer comfort, hope, or cause distress.

Clickbait or Ad-Driven Words: The article does not use clickbait or ad-driven language. The tone is factual and descriptive.

Missed Chances to Teach or Guide: The article missed opportunities to provide more value. For instance, it could have included links to the mentioned digital resources (like the Digital Knowledge Hub or the AI-powered dictionaries) if they are publicly accessible. It could have also explained how individuals interested in Arabic language learning or AI in linguistics could get involved or learn more about these projects. A missed chance is not providing information on how a regular person could access or utilize these AI-powered language tools or resources. A normal person could find better information by searching for the named institutions (e.g., Arabic Language Academy in Sharjah, Arabic Language Centre in Abu Dhabi) and their respective projects online.

The widespread adoption of AI-driven language tools risks eroding the direct, personal transmission of cultural knowledge and familial wisdom. When learning and content creation are outsourced to impersonal machines, the natural duties of elders to impart language, history, and values to children are diminished. This shift weakens the bonds of trust and responsibility within families and local communities, as the intimate act of teaching and learning is replaced by a mediated, often solitary, digital experience.

The reliance on vast digital repositories of words, while seemingly beneficial, can disconnect individuals from the lived experience and nuanced understanding that comes from intergenerational dialogue. This can lead to a superficial engagement with language and culture, undermining the deep-rooted connection to heritage that is essential for community cohesion. Furthermore, the focus on digital content creation and consumption may divert attention and effort away from the stewardship of the land and the practical, hands-on responsibilities that sustain local communities.

The introduction of AI in education and publishing, while offering efficiency, can create dependencies that fracture family cohesion. When the primary means of learning and knowledge acquisition are externalized, the natural roles of parents and extended kin in guiding the development of children are diluted. This can lead to a weakening of the familial support structures necessary for raising children and caring for elders, shifting these vital responsibilities onto distant, impersonal systems.

The consequence of these trends, if unchecked, is a gradual unraveling of the fabric of family and community. Children may grow up with a diminished sense of personal duty and connection to their kin and land. Trust between neighbors and within families will likely erode as shared responsibilities are neglected. The continuity of the people, dependent on procreation and the nurturing of the next generation within strong familial bonds, will be jeopardized, leading to a decline in the care and preservation of the land and a weakening of the collective will to ensure survival.

The text shows a positive bias towards the United Arab Emirates' efforts in promoting the Arabic language. It uses words like "grow" and "help" to describe the impact of AI projects. This framing presents the UAE's actions as purely beneficial without exploring any potential downsides or alternative perspectives.

The text highlights specific projects and organizations, such as the "Historical Dictionary of Arabic Language" and the "Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Knowledge Foundation." This focus on particular initiatives may create a biased impression by showcasing only the positive aspects of these efforts. It does not mention any challenges or criticisms these projects might face.

The description of the "GPT Historical Dictionary of the Arabic Language" uses phrases like "share this language with more people." This wording suggests a universally positive outcome of making the language more accessible. It does not consider if there might be different ways people want to access or use the language, or if this AI-driven method is the best approach for everyone.

The text uses numbers to emphasize the scale of these projects, like "over 20 million Arabic words" and "8.5 million digital items." These large figures are presented to impress the reader and support the idea that the UAE is making significant contributions. The numbers are used to build a positive image without providing context on how these resources are actually used or their effectiveness.

The text mentions a "Digital Square" introduced at a book fair to "help use AI more in publishing." This phrase suggests a straightforward benefit of AI in publishing. It does not explore any potential issues with AI in publishing, such as job displacement for human editors or the impact on creative control.

The text conveys a strong sense of pride and excitement regarding the United Arab Emirates' efforts to advance the Arabic language through artificial intelligence. This is evident in phrases like "help the Arabic language grow and be used more around the world" and descriptions of ambitious projects. The sheer scale of initiatives, such as the "GPT Historical Dictionary of the Arabic Language" with over 20 million words and the "Digital Knowledge Hub" with millions of digital items, suggests a feeling of accomplishment and forward momentum. This pride serves to build trust in the UAE's commitment to cultural preservation and global outreach. The excitement is palpable in the mention of new technologies like AI-powered dictionaries and digital publishing tools, aiming to inspire readers by showcasing innovation and progress.

The writer uses carefully chosen words to amplify these emotions. Describing projects as "big" or "special" and highlighting the vast numbers of words and digital items creates a sense of awe and importance. The repetition of the idea that AI is being used across various sectors – writing, teaching, content creation, publishing, and education – reinforces the widespread and impactful nature of these initiatives. This consistent focus on the positive application of technology in language development aims to persuade the reader that the UAE is a leader in this field. The overall message is designed to generate a positive impression, encouraging readers to view these efforts as significant and successful, thereby fostering a sense of admiration for the UAE's dedication to its language and culture.