The traditional way of earning money by trading time for skills is changing because artificial intelligence is getting better at many jobs. This means that the future economy will likely be shaped by people who own their own AI systems, rather than just using services from big technology companies.

AI is now able to do tasks that used to be done by people in office jobs, like writing, creating marketing materials, and analyzing information. This is happening much faster than many people expected and is changing how we think about work and value. The important question is who will control the new ways that value is created.

The article suggests that cryptocurrency and blockchain technology can help people own and manage their own AI. This could involve creating personal AI helpers that are trained on individual knowledge and can perform tasks, with the value they create going back to the owner. This is seen as a way to build an "ownership economy" where people have more control over their digital tools and the value they generate.

This shift could lead to new ways for people to work, with AI agents acting like independent workers. Instead of selling their time on platforms owned by others, individuals could use their AI agents to work for them, freeing up their own time for other activities. While there will be challenges, like legal and tax questions, the idea is that value will go to those who own the intelligence doing the work. The main point is that owning your AI is becoming more important than just using it.

Original article (cryptocurrency)

Actionable Information: There is no actionable information provided. The article discusses future possibilities and concepts like owning AI and cryptocurrency but does not offer any concrete steps or resources for a reader to implement these ideas.

Educational Depth: The article offers some educational depth by explaining the concept of an "ownership economy" and how AI is changing the job market. It touches upon the underlying technologies like cryptocurrency and blockchain as enablers for this shift. However, it does not delve deeply into the "how" of creating or managing personal AI systems or the technical specifics of how cryptocurrency and blockchain facilitate this.

Personal Relevance: The topic has high personal relevance as it discusses the future of work, income generation, and control over one's digital tools. It directly impacts how individuals might earn a living and manage their assets in the future.

Public Service Function: The article does not serve a public service function. It does not provide warnings, safety advice, or official information. It presents a speculative view of the future economy.

Practicality of Advice: There is no practical advice given. The article presents a concept and a potential future scenario without offering any practical steps or guidance on how to achieve it.

Long-Term Impact: The article touches upon potential long-term impacts by suggesting a shift in economic power and how value is created and distributed. It highlights a potential future where individuals have more control over their digital assets and income streams.

Emotional or Psychological Impact: The article might evoke a sense of curiosity and perhaps a degree of anxiety about the changing job market. It could also inspire a sense of empowerment by presenting a vision of greater individual control in the future economy. However, it does not offer direct emotional support or coping mechanisms.

Clickbait or Ad-Driven Words: The article does not appear to use clickbait or ad-driven words. It presents its ideas in a straightforward manner, focusing on the concepts of AI, ownership, and the future economy.

Missed Chances to Teach or Guide: The article missed a significant opportunity to provide more practical guidance. For instance, it could have suggested resources for learning about AI development, cryptocurrency, or blockchain technology. It could have also provided examples of individuals or projects already exploring these concepts. A normal person could find better information by researching terms like "decentralized AI," "AI agents," "personal AI ownership," and exploring platforms related to blockchain and cryptocurrency development. They could also look for educational courses on AI and blockchain from reputable institutions.

The text uses words that make one idea seem better than another. It says the future economy "will likely be shaped by people who own their own AI systems." This makes owning AI sound like the only good way forward. It does not show other possibilities or why owning AI is definitely the best path.

The text presents a future where owning AI is the key to success. It says, "The important question is who will control the new ways that value is created." This frames owning AI as the only way to have control. It does not explore if using AI services from big companies could also lead to control or value creation.

The article suggests a positive outcome for individuals without strong proof. It states, "This could involve creating personal AI helpers... with the value they create going back to the owner." This sounds good for people, but it is presented as a definite future. It does not mention if this is difficult or if it might not work for everyone.

The text uses strong, positive words to describe a new way of working. It talks about an "ownership economy" and people being "freed up." These words make the idea of owning AI sound very appealing. They do not mention any downsides or difficulties that might come with this new system.

The text implies that current ways of working are not as good. It says the "traditional way of earning money... is changing." It also mentions people "selling their time on platforms owned by others." This makes the old way sound bad and the new way sound much better. It does not explain why the old way might still be valuable or have benefits.

The text expresses a sense of excitement and optimism about the future of work driven by artificial intelligence. This feeling is evident in phrases like "changing because artificial intelligence is getting better at many jobs" and the suggestion that this shift will lead to "new ways for people to work." The excitement is not overly strong but serves to highlight the positive potential of these changes. It aims to inspire readers by presenting a vision of greater control and opportunity.

The writing also conveys a subtle sense of concern or unease about the current system, implied by the statement that "the traditional way of earning money... is changing." This concern is mild and serves to underscore the necessity of adapting to new models. It helps guide the reader's reaction by suggesting that clinging to old ways might be disadvantageous, thus encouraging an openness to the proposed solutions.

The core emotional driver is the empowerment that comes with ownership. This is clearly articulated in the concept of an "ownership economy" where "people have more control over their digital tools and the value they generate." This feeling of empowerment is presented as a strong positive outcome, intended to inspire action and persuade readers to consider the benefits of owning their AI.

To persuade, the writer uses words that paint a picture of progress and opportunity. Phrases like "getting better at many jobs" and "happening much faster than many people expected" create a sense of momentum and inevitability, encouraging readers to pay attention. The comparison between simply "using services from big technology companies" and "people who own their own AI systems" is a key persuasive tool, framing ownership as a superior and more beneficial path. The repetition of the idea that "value will go to those who own the intelligence doing the work" reinforces the central message and aims to solidify the reader's understanding and agreement. The overall emotional tone is one of hopeful anticipation, designed to make the reader feel positive about the proposed shift and motivated to explore these new possibilities.