Oasis is scheduled to perform three concerts in Edinburgh. Tickets for these shows sold out very quickly when they were first released. Some "production tickets" were made available earlier this year to members of Oasismynet who received special codes.

For those still hoping to attend, there are unofficial resale sites where tickets may be found. However, it's important to be aware that prices on these sites are often much higher than the original cost, and there's a risk that the tickets could be fake. It's been reported that some fans have lost a significant amount of money due to scams when buying tickets from unofficial sources. A site called Twickets is mentioned as a more "ethical" resale option.

When tickets originally went on sale, dynamic pricing was used, which caused prices to increase based on demand. Before this, the face value for tickets ranged from £74 for some seats to £206 for others, with standing tickets at £151. There were also premium packages available, with a standing package costing £216 and a seated package costing £271.

Original article (oasis) (edinburgh) (oasismynet) (twickets) (scams)

Actionable Information: The article provides some actionable information for those still hoping to attend the Oasis concerts. It suggests looking at unofficial resale sites and specifically mentions Twickets as a more "ethical" option. This gives readers a potential avenue to pursue if they are still seeking tickets.

Educational Depth: The article offers some educational depth by explaining the concept of dynamic pricing and how it affected ticket prices. It also provides a range of original ticket prices and premium package costs, which helps readers understand the cost structure. However, it doesn't delve deeply into the mechanics of dynamic pricing or the history of such practices.

Personal Relevance: The topic is personally relevant to fans of Oasis who may still be trying to secure tickets for the Edinburgh concerts. It also has relevance for anyone who has purchased or considered purchasing tickets through resale markets, as it highlights potential risks and offers a cautionary tale. The information about original and premium pricing also provides context for the current resale market.

Public Service Function: The article serves a limited public service function by warning readers about the risks associated with unofficial resale sites, such as inflated prices and the possibility of fake tickets, and mentions that some fans have lost money. It also points to a potentially more reputable resale option (Twickets). However, it doesn't offer official warnings or direct assistance.

Practicality of Advice: The advice to look at unofficial resale sites and Twickets is practical, as these are real platforms where tickets might be found. However, the article doesn't provide practical steps on how to vet unofficial sellers or how to best use Twickets, leaving some room for interpretation and potential pitfalls.

Long-Term Impact: The article's long-term impact is minimal. It primarily addresses a specific, time-sensitive event (Oasis concerts). The information about dynamic pricing and resale risks is generally applicable to ticket purchasing, but the article itself doesn't offer strategies for long-term ticket buying or financial planning related to events.

Emotional or Psychological Impact: The article might evoke a sense of urgency and perhaps disappointment for fans who missed out on original sales. The warning about scams could also create anxiety. However, by mentioning Twickets, it offers a sliver of hope for those still searching. It doesn't aim to provide deep emotional support or coping mechanisms.

Clickbait or Ad-Driven Words: The article does not appear to use clickbait or ad-driven language. The tone is informative and cautionary, rather than sensationalized.

Missed Chances to Teach or Guide: The article missed opportunities to provide more comprehensive guidance. For instance, it could have offered specific tips on how to identify legitimate resale tickets or how to protect oneself from scams on unofficial sites. It could also have provided a link to Twickets or explained how to use it effectively. A missed chance to teach would be to explain *why* production tickets are sometimes released or how dynamic pricing systems are implemented in more detail. To learn more, individuals could research "ticket resale scams" or "dynamic pricing in live events" on reputable consumer advice websites or ticketing industry resources.

The text uses strong words to make unofficial resale sites seem bad. It says there is a "risk that the tickets could be fake" and that fans "lost a significant amount of money due to scams." This makes people afraid to use these sites. It also calls Twickets "ethical," which makes it seem like the only good choice.

The text explains that "dynamic pricing was used, which caused prices to increase based on demand." This is presented as a fact. It doesn't explain why dynamic pricing might be seen as unfair or how it affects fans. It just states that prices went up because of demand.

The text mentions original ticket prices like £74 and £206, and standing tickets at £151. It also lists premium packages for £216 and £271. This shows that some tickets were much cheaper than others. It highlights the higher prices for premium options.

The text conveys a sense of excitement and disappointment surrounding the Oasis concerts. The initial mention of concerts selling out "very quickly" suggests a high level of excitement among fans, indicating a strong desire to attend. This excitement is further amplified by the mention of "production tickets" for loyal members, which implies a special privilege and adds to the overall buzz. However, for those who missed out, the text introduces a feeling of anxiety and worry. The warning about unofficial resale sites, highlighting that prices are "much higher" and there's a "risk that the tickets could be fake," is designed to create concern and caution in the reader. The specific mention that "some fans have lost a significant amount of money due to scams" directly aims to evoke fear and deter readers from engaging with these risky options.

The writer uses these emotions to guide the reader's reaction by first building anticipation and then shifting to a cautionary tone. The initial excitement about the concerts is a hook, drawing the reader in. The subsequent emphasis on the dangers of unofficial resale sites is a persuasive tactic to steer readers away from potentially harmful transactions. The writer aims to create sympathy for fans who might have been scammed and to instill worry about the possibility of similar experiences. This emotional framing is intended to make the reader more receptive to alternative, safer solutions, such as the mention of Twickets as a more "ethical" option.

The writer persuades by using emotionally charged language. Words like "sold out very quickly" and "significant amount of money" are chosen to sound more impactful than neutral descriptions. The contrast between the original ticket prices and the inflated resale prices, along with the explicit warning about "scams" and "fake" tickets, creates a sense of urgency and potential loss. This is a form of emotional exaggeration, making the risks appear more severe to emphasize the need for caution. By highlighting the negative consequences of unofficial purchases, the writer aims to change the reader's opinion about the safety of such methods and encourage a more prudent approach to ticket acquisition. The overall effect is to manage expectations and guide fans towards safer, albeit potentially still difficult, avenues for attending the concerts.