The Justice Department has hired Jared Wise as a senior adviser. Wise was involved in the January 6th Capitol riot and was seen in videos from the event calling law enforcement officers names and repeatedly shouting for them to be harmed. He had faced several criminal charges related to his participation, but he never went to trial because he received a pardon from President Trump.

Original article

Actionable Information: There is no actionable information provided. The article does not offer any steps, plans, or advice that a reader can implement in their daily life.

Educational Depth: The article provides basic factual information about a hiring decision and a past event. It does not delve into the "why" or "how" of the hiring, the legal implications of pardons, or the broader context of the January 6th Capitol riot. There is no deeper learning or explanation offered.

Personal Relevance: The topic has limited personal relevance for a typical reader. While it touches on government appointments and past events, it does not directly impact an individual's daily life, finances, safety, or personal decisions.

Public Service Function: The article does not serve a public service function. It does not offer warnings, safety advice, or useful tools. It simply reports a news item without providing any guidance or assistance to the public.

Practicality of Advice: As there is no advice given, this point is not applicable.

Long-Term Impact: The article has no discernible long-term impact on a reader's life. It does not provide information that aids in planning, saving, or future protection.

Emotional or Psychological Impact: The article is unlikely to have a significant emotional or psychological impact, either positive or negative. It is a factual report that does not aim to evoke strong emotions or provide coping mechanisms.

Clickbait or Ad-Driven Words: The language used is straightforward and factual, not employing dramatic, scary, or clickbait-style wording.

Missed Chances to Teach or Guide: The article missed opportunities to provide value. It could have explained the process of hiring senior advisers in government, the legal ramifications of presidential pardons, or provided resources for understanding the events of January 6th. A reader seeking more information could look up official government hiring processes, legal analyses of pardons, or reputable historical accounts of the Capitol riot.

The appointment of Jared Wise as a senior adviser by the Justice Department raises concerns about the integrity of kinship bonds and the protection of community members. Wise's involvement in the Capitol riot, where he incited violence against law enforcement, demonstrates a disregard for the peaceful resolution of conflict and the duty to defend and protect one's kin and community.

His actions, captured on video, show a lack of respect for authority and a willingness to engage in harmful behavior, which can erode the trust and responsibility that are essential for the survival of families and local communities. The fact that he faced criminal charges but avoided trial due to a presidential pardon further undermines the sense of justice and accountability that is vital for maintaining social order.

The impact of such behaviors on the continuity of the people and the stewardship of the land is significant. When individuals neglect their duties to uphold law and order, it creates an environment of uncertainty and potential danger, especially for the most vulnerable members of society, such as children and elders. The erosion of trust in local authorities and the normalization of violent rhetoric can lead to a breakdown of community cohesion and a decline in the protection of kin.

Furthermore, the acceptance of individuals with such a disregard for community well-being into positions of power and influence sets a dangerous precedent. It suggests that personal connections and political ideologies may take precedence over the fundamental duties of protecting and nurturing the next generation. This shift in priorities can lead to a decline in birth rates and a weakening of the social structures that support procreative families, ultimately threatening the survival of the clan and the stewardship of the land.

Restitution for such breaches of trust and duty can only come through personal accountability and a renewed commitment to the ancestral principles of protection, care, and responsibility. Apologies and fair repayment for any harm caused are necessary steps, but more importantly, there must be a re-establishment of respect for law and order, and a recognition of the vital role that each individual plays in the survival and prosperity of their community.

If these ideas and behaviors spread unchecked, the consequences for families, communities, and the land could be dire. The breakdown of kinship bonds and the erosion of local authority would lead to increased social fragmentation, making it harder for communities to come together to address shared challenges. The protection of children and elders, the care of the vulnerable, and the stewardship of resources would all be at risk. Ultimately, the survival of the people and the continuity of their way of life would be jeopardized, leaving a legacy of division and neglect for future generations.

The text uses strong words to describe Jared Wise's actions, which can make readers feel negatively about him. Words like "riot," "calling law enforcement officers names," and "shouting for them to be harmed" create a picture of bad behavior. This language aims to influence how people think about Wise and his hiring.

The text presents a one-sided view of Jared Wise's past actions. It focuses only on negative descriptions of his involvement in the January 6th event. By not including any other information about his background or perspective, the text might be trying to make him seem worse than he is.

The text uses a passive voice construction when it says, "He had faced several criminal charges related to his participation." This phrasing hides who brought the charges against him. It focuses on Wise facing charges rather than the specific actions or entities that initiated them.

The text conveys a strong sense of outrage and disapproval regarding Jared Wise's hiring by the Justice Department. This emotion is evident in the description of his actions during the January 6th Capitol riot, where he is depicted as "calling law enforcement officers names and repeatedly shouting for them to be harmed." The phrase "calling law enforcement officers names" suggests disrespect and aggression, while "repeatedly shouting for them to be harmed" highlights a dangerous and violent intent. The strength of this emotion is significant, as it directly links Wise to actions that are widely considered unacceptable and harmful. The purpose of this emotion is to create a negative perception of Wise and, by extension, the Justice Department's decision.

These emotions are used to guide the reader's reaction by causing worry and prompting a change in opinion about the Justice Department's judgment. The detailed account of Wise's past behavior is intended to make the reader question the suitability of someone with such a history for a senior advisory role. The mention of criminal charges, even though they were dropped due to a pardon, reinforces the seriousness of his past actions and further fuels the sense of unease. The writer is not aiming to build trust or inspire action in a positive sense, but rather to erode trust in the hiring decision and potentially stir public concern.

The writer employs emotional language to persuade the reader by choosing words that evoke negative feelings rather than neutral descriptions. Instead of simply stating Wise attended the event, the text emphasizes his active and aggressive participation. The phrase "involved in the January 6th Capitol riot" is factual, but the subsequent details about his behavior are highly charged. The writer uses the specific actions of "calling law enforcement officers names" and "repeatedly shouting for them to be harmed" to paint a vivid and disturbing picture. This is a form of exaggeration, not in the sense of fabricating events, but in focusing intensely on the most inflammatory aspects of his involvement to amplify the emotional impact. By highlighting the pardon from President Trump, the text subtly suggests a potential political influence that bypasses accountability, further contributing to the reader's potential disapproval and concern. These tools work together to steer the reader's attention towards the perceived impropriety of the hiring and to shape their thinking in a critical direction.