Nasdaq announced that it will stop calculating and sharing certain indexes after the close of business on September 5, 2025. The affected indexes include the Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Custom Index, the Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Custom Gross Total Return Index, and the Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Custom Net Total Return Index. This change will impact all markets and specific data feeds such as the Nasdaq Global Index Data Service, Global Index Watch, and Global Index FlexFile Delivery.

As a result of this decision, there will be no further dissemination of index values or directory messages for these indexes through the mentioned services. For any inquiries regarding Nasdaq index products, individuals are encouraged to contact Index Services or visit their website for more information.

Original article

Here is my assessment of the article's value:

Actionable Information: The article does not provide any immediate actions for readers to take. It announces a future change regarding the discontinuation of certain indexes but offers no steps or instructions for individuals to follow. There are no tools or resources mentioned that readers can utilize.

Educational Depth: While the article shares specific details about the indexes that will be discontinued, it lacks depth in explaining the reasons behind this decision. It does not educate readers on the significance of these indexes, their historical context, or the potential impact on the markets and data feeds mentioned. The article fails to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.

Personal Relevance: The topic of index discontinuation may have limited personal relevance for most readers. Unless an individual is directly involved in the financial markets or relies on these specific indexes for investment decisions, the information is unlikely to significantly impact their daily lives or future plans. It does not address how this change might affect personal finances, health, or other critical aspects of life.

Public Service Function: The article does not serve a public service function in the traditional sense. It does not provide official warnings, safety guidelines, or emergency contacts. Instead, it merely announces a business decision by Nasdaq, which, while relevant to certain professionals, does not offer practical tools or resources for the general public.

Practicality of Advice: As the article does not offer any advice or recommendations, the practicality of its content cannot be assessed.

Long-Term Impact: The long-term impact of this announcement is unclear for the average reader. While it may have implications for the financial industry and those who rely on these indexes, the article does not explore these potential consequences. It fails to provide insights into how this change might affect market trends, investment strategies, or the broader economy over time.

Emotional or Psychological Impact: The article is unlikely to evoke a strong emotional response from readers. It presents a straightforward business decision without dramatic language or sensationalism. However, for those directly affected by the index discontinuation, it may cause concern or uncertainty about future investment strategies.

Clickbait or Ad-Driven Words: The article does not employ clickbait tactics or use sensational language to attract attention. It presents the information in a professional and factual manner, avoiding exaggeration or promises of dramatic revelations.

Missed Opportunities to Teach or Guide: The article could have been more helpful by providing additional context and guidance. It could have explained the role and significance of these indexes in the financial markets, offered alternative resources or indexes for investors to consider, or provided a step-by-step guide for professionals to adapt their strategies. Additionally, including real-world examples or case studies of how these indexes have been used in the past would have added practical value.

The decision by Nasdaq to discontinue the calculation and sharing of specific indexes, including those related to green energy, may have indirect but significant impacts on local communities and their kinship structures. While the text does not explicitly mention any direct consequences for families, it is essential to consider the broader implications.

The removal of these indexes and the associated data feeds could potentially disrupt the flow of information and resources within communities that rely on green energy initiatives. If these communities have invested time, effort, and resources into developing sustainable practices, the sudden absence of relevant indexes may create a sense of uncertainty and hinder their ability to make informed decisions. This could lead to a breakdown in trust between community members and the organizations or authorities responsible for providing such data.

Furthermore, the discontinuation of these indexes might affect the economic stability of families and clans involved in green energy projects. If the indexes were used as a benchmark for investment or as a tool for securing grants and funding, their absence could result in financial strain and a lack of support for these initiatives. This, in turn, could impact the ability of families to provide for their children and elders, potentially leading to increased social and economic vulnerabilities.

The protection of children and elders, a core responsibility of families and clans, may be compromised if the discontinuation of these indexes leads to reduced opportunities for sustainable development and economic growth. The lack of clear data and benchmarks could also hinder the ability of communities to plan for the future, potentially affecting the long-term survival and prosperity of the clan.

In terms of stewardship of the land, the absence of these indexes might remove a valuable tool for monitoring and managing environmental impacts. Without such data, communities may struggle to make informed decisions about land use, resource allocation, and the preservation of natural habitats. This could lead to unintended consequences, such as increased environmental degradation, which would ultimately impact the health and well-being of the community and its future generations.

If the described behaviors and ideas spread unchecked, the consequences could be dire. The breakdown of trust and the removal of essential tools for community development could lead to a decline in local initiatives, increased social and economic disparities, and a weakened sense of collective responsibility. This, in turn, would affect the ability of families to thrive, potentially leading to a decline in birth rates and a disruption of the intergenerational transfer of knowledge and care.

The ancestral principle of survival through deeds and daily care is threatened when local communities lose control over essential information and resources. It is vital that communities are empowered to make their own decisions, uphold their responsibilities, and protect their kin, especially in the face of changing circumstances. Restitution and renewal of commitment to clan duties are essential to ensure the continuity of the people and the stewardship of the land.

"Nasdaq announced that it will stop calculating and sharing certain indexes..."

This sentence uses passive voice to avoid directly stating who is making the decision. By saying "Nasdaq announced," it hides the individuals or specific group within Nasdaq responsible for this change. The passive construction downplays individual accountability and shifts focus to the organization as a whole. This strategy can make it harder to identify and hold accountable those directly involved in the decision-making process.

"...the Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Custom Index..."

Here, the use of specific, technical terms like "Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Custom Index" may create an impression of complexity and expertise. This language choice could potentially intimidate or overwhelm readers who are not familiar with such terminology. By using these specialized terms, the text may aim to establish an air of authority and expertise, which could influence readers' perceptions and interpretations.

The text conveys a sense of finality and a hint of disappointment. The announcement of the discontinuation of certain indexes by Nasdaq is a clear indicator of an ending, and the use of the phrase "after the close of business" adds a sense of closure and a definitive stop to these services. This emotion is subtle but present, as the text does not explicitly state any feelings of sadness or regret.

The strength of this emotion is moderate, as it is implied rather than explicitly stated. The purpose of this subtle emotion is to inform the reader of an important change without causing alarm or panic. It is a gentle way to deliver news that may impact some individuals or organizations, especially those who rely on these indexes for their work or investments.

To guide the reader's reaction, the text maintains a neutral and factual tone, which helps to keep the reader informed without evoking strong emotional responses. By not overstating the impact or using dramatic language, the writer ensures that the reader can process the information without being overwhelmed or overly concerned.

In terms of persuasion, the writer uses a straightforward and concise style, avoiding any emotional language that might sway the reader's opinion. The repetition of the phrase "Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Custom Index" and its variations emphasizes the importance of these indexes and the scope of the change. This repetition also serves to highlight the specificity of the decision, which could be seen as a persuasive technique to emphasize the thought and consideration that went into the choice.

Additionally, the writer provides clear instructions for further inquiries, which builds trust and encourages readers to seek more information if needed. This proactive approach to providing support and guidance is a subtle persuasive technique, as it shows a commitment to transparency and assistance. By offering these resources, the writer ensures that readers feel supported and understood, which can help mitigate any potential negative reactions to the news.