A 63-year-old man named Dilip Kumar Saha passed away in Kolkata, with his family attributing his death to the fear surrounding the implementation of the National Register of Citizens (NRC). Saha, who worked as a non-teaching staff member at a private school in Dhakuria, had moved to Kolkata from Nawabganj in Dhaka back in 1972. His wife, Aarti Saha, mentioned that he had been experiencing significant stress and anxiety about potentially being sent back to Bangladesh if the NRC was enforced. Despite having valid identification documents, including a voter ID card, he was deeply troubled by news reports regarding the NRC.

The concern over NRC implementation has been particularly heightened in West Bengal ahead of the upcoming Lok Sabha elections. Political leaders have suggested that this fear is part of a broader campaign orchestrated by certain political groups. West Bengal's Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee previously noted that several individuals had died due to similar fears related to NRC policies.

Local politicians have voiced their concerns about how such fears can impact citizens' lives. West Bengal Power Minister Arup Biswas emphasized that this situation reflects an anti-people attitude from the central government and criticized how Bengali-speaking citizens are being treated under these policies. The ruling party has accused opposition parties of creating an atmosphere of fear and intimidation among residents regarding their citizenship status.

Original article

Here is my assessment of the article's value to the reader:

Actionable Information: The article does not provide any immediate actions or steps that readers can take. It informs about an individual's death and the surrounding circumstances, but it does not offer any practical guidance or tools to address the fears and concerns related to the NRC.

Educational Depth: While the article shares some historical context and mentions the impact of NRC policies on individuals, it does not delve deeply into the why and how of these policies. It could have provided more educational value by explaining the legal framework, the process of NRC implementation, and the potential outcomes for affected individuals.

Personal Relevance: The topic of NRC implementation and its potential impact on citizenship is highly relevant to individuals living in West Bengal, especially those with similar migration backgrounds or concerns about their legal status. The article highlights the very real fears and anxieties that such policies can induce, making it personally relevant to a significant portion of the population.

Public Service Function: The article does not serve an immediate public service function by providing official warnings, emergency contacts, or practical resources. It primarily reports on an individual's death and the political discourse surrounding the NRC, without offering any direct assistance or guidance to the public.

Practicality of Advice: As there is no advice or guidance offered in the article, the practicality of advice cannot be assessed.

Long-Term Impact: The article does not address long-term strategies or solutions to alleviate the fears and concerns related to the NRC. It focuses on an individual's experience and the political narrative, rather than offering any lasting impact or guidance for the future.

Emotional/Psychological Impact: The article may induce feelings of fear, anxiety, and helplessness in readers, especially those who can relate to the individual's situation. It does not provide any psychological support or strategies to cope with such emotions, leaving readers with a sense of uncertainty and potential distress.

Clickbait or Ad-Driven Words: The article does not appear to use sensational or clickbait language. It presents the information in a relatively neutral tone, focusing on the facts and the political discourse.

Missed Opportunities to Teach or Guide: The article could have been more helpful by providing clear, practical steps that individuals can take to address their citizenship concerns. It could have offered resources, such as legal advice or support groups, and explained the process of obtaining necessary documentation. Additionally, including personal stories of individuals who have successfully navigated the NRC process could have provided hope and guidance to readers.

In summary, while the article raises important issues and highlights the human impact of NRC policies, it falls short in providing actionable information, educational depth, and practical guidance. It could have been more valuable to readers by offering concrete steps, resources, and a deeper understanding of the legal and emotional aspects of the situation.

The fear and anxiety surrounding the National Register of Citizens (NRC) have had a detrimental impact on the well-being and unity of families and local communities. In this case, Dilip Kumar Saha's death, attributed to the stress caused by NRC-related fears, highlights how abstract policies can directly affect the health and survival of individuals and their kin.

The NRC, as an external force, has the potential to fracture the natural bonds of family and community. It creates an atmosphere of uncertainty and intimidation, particularly for those with valid identification, like Saha, who still feel vulnerable and threatened. This fear can lead to increased stress, anxiety, and even physical health issues, as evidenced by Saha's passing.

The impact of such policies extends beyond individual families. It can create a sense of division and mistrust within communities, as seen in the accusations and counter-accusations between political parties. This atmosphere of fear and suspicion undermines the very fabric of community life, making it difficult for people to come together and support each other.

Furthermore, the focus on citizenship status and the potential for forced displacement can disrupt the natural order of family life and community stewardship. It may lead to a breakdown of family structures, as elders, who are often the guardians of tradition and wisdom, become preoccupied with fears of displacement and the survival of their lineage.

The erosion of trust and the imposition of fear can also impact the care and protection of children. Parents, preoccupied with their own anxieties, may struggle to provide the necessary emotional and physical support to their offspring, potentially leading to a generation that lacks the stability and guidance needed for healthy development.

The long-term consequences of such policies, if left unchecked, could be devastating. The spread of fear and uncertainty may lead to a decline in birth rates, as potential parents become hesitant to bring children into a world where their citizenship and survival are constantly questioned. This, in turn, would threaten the very continuity of the community and its ability to thrive and care for its land.

Additionally, the erosion of community trust and the breakdown of family structures could result in a society that is less able to care for its vulnerable members, including the elderly and those who may struggle to navigate the complexities of citizenship processes.

In conclusion, the described scenario, where fear and uncertainty are weaponized and used to divide and control, has the potential to severely weaken the bonds that hold families and communities together. If these ideas and behaviors are allowed to spread unchecked, they will undermine the very foundations of society, threatening the survival and prosperity of future generations. It is essential that local communities and families are empowered to protect their own, to uphold their duties, and to ensure the continuity and stewardship of their lands and traditions.

"His wife, Aarti Saha, mentioned that he had been experiencing significant stress and anxiety about potentially being sent back to Bangladesh if the NRC was enforced."

This sentence shows a bias towards the man's fear and anxiety. It emphasizes his emotional state without providing a full context. The use of words like "significant" and "anxiety" adds a layer of intensity to his feelings, potentially influencing readers to sympathize with his worries.

The text evokes a range of emotions, primarily centered around fear and anxiety, which are the dominant sentiments expressed by Dilip Kumar Saha's family and the wider community in West Bengal. These emotions are strong and palpable, serving to highlight the profound impact of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) on individuals' lives and the collective psyche of the region.

Fear is a central emotion in the text, particularly for Dilip Kumar Saha, who experienced deep anxiety about the potential consequences of the NRC. His fear is justified by the valid identification documents he possessed, yet his worry was intensified by news reports surrounding the NRC. This fear is not isolated; it is shared by many in West Bengal, as evidenced by the concerns raised by local politicians and the ruling party's accusations. The fear is further heightened by the upcoming Lok Sabha elections, suggesting a political dimension to the anxiety.

The text also conveys a sense of sadness and sympathy, especially when considering the passing of Dilip Kumar Saha and the impact of his fear on his family. His wife's mention of his stress and anxiety paints a picture of a man deeply troubled by the situation, which ultimately contributed to his death. This personal narrative adds a human element to the story, making the fear and its consequences more tangible and relatable to the reader.

Anger is another emotion that surfaces, particularly in the responses of local politicians and the ruling party. The ruling party's accusation of opposition parties creating an atmosphere of fear reflects a sense of indignation and frustration. This anger is directed at the perceived manipulation of citizens' fears for political gain, suggesting a desire to protect the community from such tactics.

The emotions in the text are strategically employed to guide the reader's reaction and shape their understanding of the situation. The fear and anxiety expressed by Dilip Kumar Saha and his family are intended to evoke sympathy and concern from the reader, highlighting the human cost of the NRC. The personal narrative of Saha's experience adds an emotional depth to the story, making it more compelling and memorable.

The anger expressed by politicians serves a different purpose, aiming to shift the blame and create a sense of outrage among readers. By accusing opposition parties, the ruling party attempts to redirect the focus and present themselves as protectors of the people, thus building trust and support.

The writer employs various persuasive techniques to enhance the emotional impact of the text. One notable strategy is the use of repetition, with the fear surrounding the NRC being mentioned multiple times, reinforcing its significance and the widespread anxiety it has caused. The personal story of Dilip Kumar Saha is another powerful tool, as it humanizes the issue and makes the abstract concept of NRC more concrete and relatable.

Additionally, the writer employs emotional language, such as describing Saha's anxiety as "significant" and "deep," which adds intensity to the emotions expressed. These linguistic choices and narrative techniques work together to create a compelling narrative that guides the reader's emotional response and shapes their perception of the NRC's impact.