Fishermen in Tamil Nadu have called on the State government to restart a training program focused on net mending at the Fisheries University in Ponneri. This initiative aims to help young people develop skills that would allow them to create and repair fishing nets, potentially starting their own small businesses. Nanjil Ravi from the Anaithu Meenavar Sangam expressed concern that many youngsters, particularly those without boats, are missing out on this valuable training due to its suspension for unknown reasons.

A retired official from the Fisheries Department explained that training is typically offered when individuals apply for bank loans to start a business, as they need certification of their skills. The university provides this training under guidance from the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) department, along with lunch and travel allowances for participants. However, financial issues arose when previous expenses were not reimbursed by the Skill Development Centre.

Community leader M.D. Dayalan pointed out that only two courses—boat driving and net mending—have been conducted under this scheme. He suggested expanding the offerings to include training in fish storage and processing, which could further benefit local fishermen. An official from the university indicated they would consider addressing these concerns moving forward.

Original article (ponneri)

The article provides some actionable information by highlighting the need for a specific training program focused on net mending. It encourages the State government to restart this initiative, which can potentially empower young people to start their own fishing-related businesses. However, it does not offer any immediate steps or instructions for readers to take; instead, it focuses on advocating for the program's revival.

In terms of educational depth, the article explains the importance of net mending training and how it can benefit individuals without boats. It also sheds light on the financial issues that led to the suspension of the program, providing some context and insight into the challenges faced by the Fisheries University. While it does not delve into extensive detail, it offers a basic understanding of the situation and the potential impact on the fishing community.

Regarding personal relevance, the article directly affects fishermen in Tamil Nadu and those considering entering the fishing industry. It highlights the potential for economic empowerment and the development of valuable skills. For individuals interested in fishing-related businesses, particularly those without access to boats, the article underscores the importance of such training programs.

While the article does not explicitly provide a public service function, it brings attention to a community issue and advocates for a solution. It raises awareness about the suspension of a potentially beneficial training program and the concerns of community leaders and fishermen.

The practicality of the advice is limited as the article primarily focuses on advocating for the program's revival rather than offering practical steps for readers to take. It does not provide clear instructions on how individuals can access such training or start their own fishing-related businesses.

In terms of long-term impact, the article suggests that the net mending training program could have a positive and lasting effect on the fishing community. By empowering young people with skills and potentially enabling them to start their own businesses, it could contribute to the long-term sustainability and growth of the industry.

Emotionally, the article may evoke a sense of concern or frustration among readers, particularly those invested in the fishing industry or interested in its development. It highlights a potential gap in training opportunities and the impact this has on the community. However, it does not offer any emotional support or guidance on how to address these concerns.

The article does not employ clickbait or sensational language. It presents the information in a straightforward manner, focusing on the facts and the community's concerns.

To improve its value, the article could have included more practical guidance for readers. For instance, it could have provided information on alternative training programs or resources available for those interested in net mending or fishing-related businesses. Additionally, it could have offered suggestions on how individuals can advocate for the revival of such programs or engage with community leaders to address these concerns.

The text shows a bias towards helping young people, especially those without boats, by offering training opportunities. It highlights the concern of Nanjil Ravi, who wants the training program to restart, benefiting those who want to start their own businesses. This bias is seen in the following:

"Fishermen in Tamil Nadu have called on the State government to restart a training program focused on net mending at the Fisheries University in Ponneri. This initiative aims to help young people develop skills..."

The focus on young people and their potential to start businesses is a positive bias, encouraging support for this demographic.

The text expresses a range of emotions, primarily centered around concern, disappointment, and a sense of urgency. These emotions are conveyed through the words and actions of the individuals involved, particularly the fishermen and community leaders.

The fishermen's call for the training program's restart reveals their concern about the lack of opportunities for young people, especially those without boats, to learn valuable skills. This concern is further emphasized by Nanjil Ravi's expression of worry, indicating that many youngsters are missing out on potential economic benefits. The retired official's explanation of the training's purpose and the financial issues that arose adds a layer of disappointment, as the program's suspension has impacted the certification process and, consequently, the ability of individuals to secure loans and start businesses.

Community leader M.D. Dayalan's suggestion to expand the training offerings showcases a forward-thinking and proactive approach, aiming to provide more comprehensive support to local fishermen. This emotion of determination and a desire for improvement helps guide the reader's reaction by highlighting the potential for positive change and the need for action to address the current shortcomings.

The writer uses emotional language to persuade by emphasizing the impact of the training program's absence on the community. By focusing on the concerns of the fishermen and community leaders, the writer creates a sense of sympathy and understanding for their situation. The use of phrases like "missing out" and "suspension for unknown reasons" adds an element of mystery and worry, prompting the reader to question the reasons behind the program's halt.

Additionally, the writer employs a strategic comparison between the two courses that have been conducted and the potential for further training in fish storage and processing. This comparison highlights the limited nature of the current offerings and implies that the community is not receiving the full range of support it deserves. By making this comparison, the writer emphasizes the need for expansion and improvement, steering the reader's attention towards the potential benefits of a more comprehensive training program.

Overall, the emotional tone of the text serves to create a sense of urgency and a call to action, encouraging readers to support the restart of the training program and the expansion of its offerings to better serve the local fishing community.