Yuzvendra Chahal, an Indian cricketer, recently shared details about his last conversation with his ex-wife, Dhanashree Verma. The couple married in December 2020 but divorced in March 2025 after five years together. Their separation had been ongoing since June 2022, and they filed for divorce by mutual consent earlier this year.

Chahal revealed that their communication dwindled significantly after the 2024 T20 World Cup, with only formal discussions taking place. He mentioned that their last interaction was during a video call involving lawyers, stating there had been no messages exchanged afterward. For several months before the divorce, they had not been on speaking terms except for important matters.

When discussing the reasons behind their split, Chahal indicated that both he and Dhanashree had brought up the topic of divorce at different times until it was mutually agreed upon. He expressed that despite efforts to reconcile their relationship, they ultimately decided it was best to part ways. Chahal also addressed rumors regarding infidelity during their marriage and clarified that he remained faithful throughout.

The couple chose to keep their separation private until the divorce was finalized to avoid public scrutiny while navigating personal challenges during this time.

Original article (india) (december) (march) (june)

Here is my analysis of the article's value to the reader:

Actionable Information: The article does not provide any immediate actions or steps that a reader can take. It shares details about a celebrity couple's divorce but does not offer any practical advice or tools for readers facing similar situations.

Educational Depth: While the article provides some insights into the reasons behind the couple's divorce and their efforts to reconcile, it does not delve deeply into the broader context or causes of relationship breakdowns. It fails to educate readers on the potential warning signs, common challenges, or strategies for navigating relationship difficulties.

Personal Relevance: The topic of celebrity divorces may be of interest to some readers, but it does not directly impact their daily lives or offer practical guidance for their own relationships. The article does not address the broader implications of divorce, such as legal processes, financial considerations, or emotional well-being, which could be more relevant to the average reader.

Public Service Function: The article does not serve a public service purpose. It does not provide official warnings, safety advice, or emergency contacts. Instead, it focuses on sharing personal details about a celebrity couple's divorce, which does not contribute to the public's well-being or safety.

Practicality of Advice: As the article does not offer any advice or recommendations, it cannot be assessed for practicality.

Long-Term Impact: The article does not discuss long-term strategies or offer insights that could help readers plan for the future. It fails to address the potential lasting effects of divorce, such as the impact on children, financial stability, or emotional healing, which could have provided more value to readers.

Emotional or Psychological Impact: The article may evoke curiosity or interest in readers, but it does not provide emotional support or guidance for dealing with relationship challenges. It does not offer strategies for coping with divorce or improving relationship dynamics, which could have a more positive psychological impact.

Clickbait or Ad-Driven Words: The article does not use sensational or clickbait language. It presents the information in a straightforward manner, focusing on the details of the celebrity couple's divorce.

Missed Opportunities to Teach or Guide: The article could have been more valuable if it had included resources or guidance for readers seeking support during relationship difficulties. It could have provided links to reputable counseling services, offered tips for open communication, or shared stories of successful relationship repairs. Additionally, including statistics or expert opinions on divorce trends and their impact could have added depth and relevance to the article.

"Their separation had been ongoing since June 2022..." This sentence uses passive voice to hide who initiated the separation. It suggests that the separation just happened, without mentioning the couple's active decision to part ways. This passive construction downplays their agency and makes the split seem less intentional. By using "had been ongoing," it creates a sense of inevitability, as if the separation was a natural progression, rather than a choice made by the individuals involved.

The text reveals a range of emotions experienced by Yuzvendra Chahal and Dhanashree Verma during their divorce process. Sadness is a prominent emotion, evident in Chahal's revelation that their communication diminished significantly after the 2024 T20 World Cup, leaving only formal discussions. The mention of a video call involving lawyers and the absence of further messages afterward underscores the distance and formality that had crept into their relationship. This sadness is further emphasized by the acknowledgment that they had not been on speaking terms for several months before the divorce, except for important matters.

The decision to divorce, despite efforts to reconcile, suggests a sense of resignation and acceptance of their situation. Chahal's expression of faithfulness throughout their marriage, in response to rumors of infidelity, conveys a desire to set the record straight and maintain his integrity. This emotion serves to build trust with the audience, assuring them of his honesty and loyalty.

The couple's choice to keep their separation private until the divorce was finalized reflects a desire for privacy and a wish to avoid public scrutiny during a challenging personal time. This emotion of privacy and protection guides the reader's reaction by fostering an understanding of the couple's need for space and respect during their difficult journey.

The writer's use of emotion is persuasive, creating a narrative that humanizes Chahal and Dhanashree's experience. By sharing personal details, such as the timeline of their marriage and divorce, the writer invites the reader to connect with their story. The repetition of key phrases like "no messages exchanged afterward" and "not on speaking terms" emphasizes the emotional distance and the finality of their separation. This strategic use of language intensifies the emotional impact, steering the reader's attention towards the couple's struggle and the challenges they faced in their relationship.

Additionally, the inclusion of a personal story, detailing the couple's journey from marriage to divorce, allows the reader to empathize with their situation. By comparing their relationship to a public event, the 2024 T20 World Cup, the writer creates a relatable timeline, making their experience more tangible and understandable. This comparison and the use of emotional language work together to shape the reader's opinion, encouraging a sympathetic and understanding response to the couple's divorce.