A senior Chinese diplomat, Shi Mingde, expressed concerns that the recent trade agreement between the European Union (EU) and the United States could increase Europe’s economic and security dependence on the US. This deal was discussed during an event in Beijing celebrating 50 years of diplomatic relations between China and the EU. Shi, who previously served as China’s ambassador to Germany, argued that while Europe aims to reduce its reliance on China to mitigate risks, this strategy is flawed. He pointed out that Europe's dependence on the US remains strong in both security and economic aspects. The agreement with Washington may further reinforce this dependency, complicating Europe's pursuit of strategic autonomy.

Original article (china) (beijing) (germany)

The article does not provide any immediate actionable information for readers. It does not offer specific steps or strategies for individuals to take regarding the trade agreement or Europe's dependence on the US. There are no tools or resources mentioned that readers can utilize.

In terms of educational depth, the article provides some insight into the potential consequences of the EU-US trade agreement on Europe's strategic autonomy. It explains the diplomat's perspective on how this agreement may impact Europe's reliance on the US. However, it does not delve deeply into the historical context, economic theories, or geopolitical strategies that could enhance readers' understanding.

The topic has personal relevance for those interested in international relations, trade, and diplomacy. It may also be of interest to those concerned about Europe's economic and security landscape. However, for the average person, the direct impact on their daily lives is limited. The article does not discuss how this agreement could affect consumer prices, job markets, or other tangible aspects of people's lives.

There is no public service function evident in the article. It does not provide any official warnings, safety advice, or emergency information. It simply reports on a diplomatic event and the concerns expressed by a Chinese diplomat.

The advice provided, which is to reduce reliance on China, is not practical for most individuals. This is a strategic decision that would primarily impact governments and large corporations. The article does not offer any guidance on how individuals can personally navigate or mitigate the potential consequences of this agreement.

The article does not focus on long-term impact. It discusses a current event and its potential implications but does not provide strategies or ideas for long-term planning or resilience.

Emotionally, the article may create a sense of concern or curiosity about Europe's future. However, it does not offer any psychological support or guidance on how to process or respond to these concerns.

The language used is not clickbait-y or sensationalized. It presents the information in a straightforward manner, focusing on the diplomat's perspective.

To gain a better understanding of the potential impacts of this trade agreement, readers could explore trusted news sources that provide in-depth analysis of economic and security implications. Additionally, seeking out expert opinions from economists, international relations scholars, or security analysts could offer more practical insights and guidance.

"This deal was discussed during an event in Beijing celebrating 50 years of diplomatic relations between China and the EU."

This sentence uses a passive voice construction to obscure the fact that China initiated the discussion about the EU-US trade agreement. By using the passive voice, it creates a sense of neutrality and implies that the topic arose naturally during the event, when in reality, China brought it up. This framing benefits China by presenting its concerns as a neutral observation rather than an aggressive move. It also downplays the potential impact of China's actions on EU-US relations.

The text conveys a range of emotions, primarily stemming from the senior diplomat's concerns about the EU-US trade agreement and its potential impact on Europe's relationship with China.

One prominent emotion is worry, which is evident in Shi Mingde's expression of concern over Europe's increasing economic and security dependence on the US. This worry is further emphasized by his argument that Europe's strategy to reduce reliance on China may be flawed, as it could lead to an even stronger dependency on the US. The strength of this emotion is moderate, as it is expressed in a diplomatic and measured tone, but it serves to highlight the potential risks and complexities that Europe may face.

Another emotion that appears is a subtle sense of caution or even skepticism. Shi points out that Europe's dependence on the US is already strong, suggesting a cautious approach towards any agreements that might reinforce this dependency. This emotion guides the reader to consider the potential pitfalls and challenges that Europe might encounter in its pursuit of strategic autonomy.

The text also conveys a sense of frustration or disappointment, especially in Shi's argument that Europe's strategy is flawed. This emotion is relatively mild but adds a layer of complexity to the message, suggesting that the diplomat is not entirely satisfied with the direction Europe is taking.

These emotions are used to create a sense of concern and caution among readers. By expressing worry and skepticism, the writer aims to highlight the potential drawbacks of the EU-US agreement and encourage a more critical evaluation of Europe's strategic decisions. The emotions guide readers to consider the long-term implications and potential risks associated with increased dependence on the US.

To persuade readers, the writer employs a strategic choice of words and phrases. For instance, describing Europe's dependence on the US as "strong" and the potential agreement as "reinforcing" this dependency, creates a sense of intensity and concern. The use of words like "flawed" and "complicating" also adds a negative tone, suggesting that the agreement may lead to undesirable outcomes.

Additionally, the writer employs a personal touch by referencing Shi's previous role as China's ambassador to Germany, which adds credibility and a sense of experience to his concerns. This personal connection can help build trust and encourage readers to consider the diplomat's perspective more seriously.

Overall, the emotional language and persuasive techniques used in the text aim to steer readers towards a more cautious and critical evaluation of the EU-US trade agreement, highlighting the potential risks and complexities that Europe may face in its pursuit of strategic autonomy.