In Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, a serious case of medical negligence occurred when a doctor was found sleeping in the emergency ward while an injured patient died due to lack of treatment. A viral video showed the junior doctor asleep with his feet on a table, as the patient, identified as Sunil from Hasanpur village, lay unattended on a stretcher after being struck by an unidentified vehicle.

Sunil's family reported that he sustained severe injuries and was taken to Lala Lajpat Rai Memorial (LLRM) Medical College's emergency department but received no care because the doctors were asleep. They described him as being treated like an "abandoned patient," leading to his eventual death from his injuries.

Following public outrage over the incident and the viral video, LLRM Medical College took immediate action by suspending two junior doctors who were on duty at that time. Dr. R C Gupta, the college principal, confirmed their suspension and announced that a three-member inquiry committee would investigate the matter and report back within three days.

The incident has sparked significant anger on social media platforms, with many users demanding accountability for those involved and calling for reforms in emergency healthcare services at government hospitals. Concerns have been raised about public trust in these institutions if such negligence occurs during critical moments when patients need urgent care.

Original article

This article provides an account of a tragic incident of medical negligence and the subsequent actions taken by the authorities.

Actionable Information: The article does not offer any immediate steps or instructions for readers to take. It primarily informs the public about the incident and the disciplinary actions being taken by the medical college.

Educational Depth: It provides a detailed narrative of the event, including the patient's identity, the circumstances of his injury, and the response (or lack thereof) from the medical staff. This depth of information helps readers understand the severity of the situation and the potential consequences of such negligence.

Personal Relevance: While the specific incident may not directly affect the reader's life, it highlights a broader issue of public trust in emergency healthcare services, particularly in government hospitals. This is a relevant topic for anyone who may require emergency medical care or who has loved ones who might need such services.

Public Service Function: The article serves a public service by bringing attention to a serious issue and by reporting on the actions taken by the medical college to address the negligence. It informs the public about the steps being taken to hold individuals accountable and to potentially prevent similar incidents in the future.

Practicality of Advice: The article does not offer advice per se, but it does highlight the importance of accountability and the need for reforms in emergency healthcare services. This could encourage readers to advocate for better healthcare standards and to be more vigilant about their own healthcare experiences.

Long-Term Impact: By bringing attention to this issue, the article has the potential to contribute to long-term improvements in emergency healthcare services. It may encourage further discussion, investigation, and implementation of measures to enhance patient care and safety.

Emotional/Psychological Impact: The article may evoke strong emotions, such as anger or sadness, in response to the tragic outcome of the patient's death. It could also prompt readers to reflect on their own experiences with healthcare services and to consider the importance of advocating for themselves and their loved ones.

Clickbait/Ad-driven Words: The article does not appear to use sensational or misleading language to grab attention. It presents the facts of the incident and the subsequent actions in a straightforward manner.

Missed Chances to Teach/Guide: The article could have provided more information about the inquiry committee's findings and any proposed reforms or changes to emergency healthcare protocols. It could also have directed readers to resources or organizations that advocate for patient rights and improved healthcare standards.

The incident described in the text reveals a profound breach of trust and duty within the community, particularly concerning the protection and care of vulnerable individuals.

The medical negligence displayed by the doctors, who chose to sleep instead of attending to an injured patient, directly contradicts the fundamental responsibility of caring for the sick and injured, a duty that is essential for the survival and well-being of the community. This neglect not only led to the untimely death of Sunil, but it also erodes the trust that families and individuals place in emergency healthcare services, a trust that is crucial for the effective functioning of local communities.

The impact of such negligence extends beyond the immediate loss of life. It undermines the sense of security and protection that families rely on when facing medical emergencies. When community members cannot trust that their loved ones will receive timely and adequate care, it weakens the fabric of social support and solidarity, essential elements for the survival and resilience of the clan.

Furthermore, the incident highlights a potential shift of family responsibilities onto distant and impersonal authorities. When medical professionals fail in their duties, it can lead to a reliance on external systems of accountability and reform, diverting attention and resources away from the immediate needs of the community and the fulfillment of family duties.

The consequences of such behaviors, if left unchecked, are dire. The spread of medical negligence and the erosion of trust in emergency healthcare services could lead to increased mortality rates, particularly among the vulnerable and those in critical need of immediate care. This, in turn, could result in a decline in birth rates as families become less confident in the ability of the community to protect and care for their children.

The breakdown of trust and the neglect of duty within the medical profession also has the potential to fracture community bonds, as individuals may feel compelled to seek care outside of their local communities, further weakening the social fabric that is essential for the stewardship of the land and the protection of kin.

In conclusion, the described behaviors, if allowed to persist and spread, threaten the very foundations of community survival and continuity. They undermine the trust, responsibility, and care that are necessary for the protection of children, the care of elders, and the peaceful resolution of conflicts within the clan. It is through the restoration of these fundamental duties and the re-establishment of trust that communities can ensure their long-term survival and the stewardship of their lands.

"A serious case of medical negligence occurred when a doctor was found sleeping in the emergency ward while an injured patient died due to lack of treatment."

This sentence uses strong language like "serious case" and "medical negligence" to create a negative impression and evoke emotions. It frames the incident as a clear-cut example of wrongdoing, leaving no room for alternative perspectives or context.

The text evokes a range of emotions, primarily centered around anger, sadness, and a sense of injustice. These emotions are interwoven throughout the narrative, building upon each other to create a powerful reaction from the reader.

The anger is evident from the very beginning, with the description of the doctor sleeping on duty while a patient lay dying. The use of words like "serious case," "medical negligence," and "abandoned patient" paints a picture of gross misconduct and a blatant disregard for human life. This anger intensifies as the story progresses, with the family's report of their loved one's severe injuries and the doctors' apparent lack of care. The anger serves to highlight the injustice of the situation and to provoke a strong emotional response from the reader, aligning them with the family's sense of outrage.

Sadness is also a prominent emotion, especially when considering the family's perspective. The description of Sunil, the injured patient, being treated as an "abandoned patient" and eventually succumbing to his injuries, evokes a deep sense of sorrow. This emotion is further emphasized by the family's report, which humanizes the victim and highlights the personal tragedy of the situation. The sadness helps to create a connection between the reader and the family, encouraging empathy and a desire for justice.

The text also aims to inspire action and demand accountability. The public's anger, as expressed on social media, is a call to hold those responsible accountable for their actions. The use of the word "outrage" to describe the public's reaction emphasizes the need for change and reform. This emotion-driven call to action is a powerful tool, as it motivates readers to take a stand and demand better healthcare services.

To persuade the reader, the writer employs several rhetorical devices. One notable technique is the use of vivid language and descriptive phrases. For instance, the phrase "feet on a table" creates a stark visual image of the doctor's casual attitude, contrasting sharply with the seriousness of the situation. This extreme contrast emphasizes the doctor's negligence and adds to the overall emotional impact.

Additionally, the writer employs a personal story, detailing the victim's identity and background. By humanizing Sunil and providing context to his life, the writer creates a more intimate connection with the reader. This personal narrative adds depth to the story, making the emotional impact more profound and the call for justice more urgent.

In summary, the text skillfully weaves emotions of anger, sadness, and injustice to guide the reader's reaction. By evoking these emotions, the writer aims to create a sense of outrage, inspire action, and demand accountability. The use of persuasive language and rhetorical devices enhances the emotional impact, ensuring the reader is not just informed but also compelled to take a stand against medical negligence.