China is being encouraged to take control of its narrative and engage more actively with other Asian countries to counter the influence of Western perspectives. Experts in Chinese politics and media suggest that China should leverage its cultural symbols and foster collaboration with scholars across Asia to reshape its global messaging. They argue that for too long, Western discourse has dominated international conversations, making it difficult for China to project its voice effectively.

A political scientist highlighted the importance of adopting an open mindset when developing an "Asian narrative." He emphasized that imposing a ready-made story, similar to what he claims the United States does, would not be effective. As global power dynamics shift—particularly with the U.S. focusing more on domestic issues—there is a growing need for emerging economies like those in Asia to play a more significant role in shaping international norms and rules.

The call for China to lead in creating a new discourse reflects broader changes in global governance, where emerging economies seek greater influence as traditional powers appear less stable. This shift underscores the increasing competition over "discourse power" on the world stage.

Original article

The article provides an analysis of the current global discourse and China's role in it, offering a perspective on how China can navigate and influence international conversations.

Actionable Information: The article does not provide specific, immediate actions for readers to take. It discusses a broader strategy and mindset for China to adopt, but it does not offer a step-by-step guide or tools for individual readers to utilize.

Educational Depth: It educates readers on the dynamics of global governance, the shift in power, and the importance of an "Asian narrative." It explains the reasons behind the call for China's active engagement and provides insights into the challenges and opportunities for emerging economies. However, it may not delve deeply into the historical context or provide extensive explanations of the systems at play.

Personal Relevance: The topic is relevant to readers interested in international relations, global politics, and the role of emerging economies. It may also be of interest to those concerned with cultural representation and the influence of different perspectives on a global scale. However, for those not directly involved in these fields, the personal impact may be less immediate and tangible.

Public Service Function: The article does not serve an immediate public service function by providing warnings, safety advice, or emergency contacts. Instead, it offers a broader analysis and perspective on global discourse, which may be more relevant to policymakers, scholars, and those engaged in international affairs.

Practicality of Advice: The advice given, to adopt an open mindset and engage with other Asian countries, is practical in the sense that it encourages a proactive approach. However, the article does not provide detailed strategies or plans for implementation, making it less actionable for readers seeking practical guidance.

Long-Term Impact: The article's focus on reshaping global discourse and China's role in it suggests a long-term impact. By encouraging a shift in perspective and engagement, it aims to influence the future of international relations and the role of emerging economies. This could have lasting effects on global governance and the balance of power.

Emotional/Psychological Impact: The article may inspire readers with a sense of the potential for change and the importance of diverse perspectives. It could motivate individuals to engage more deeply with international issues and consider the broader implications of global discourse. However, it may also leave some readers feeling a sense of powerlessness, as the strategies discussed are largely at a national or international level.

Clickbait/Ad-driven Words: The article does not appear to use sensational or clickbait-style language. It presents an analysis and perspective in a straightforward manner, without relying on dramatic or shocking language to grab attention.

Missed Opportunities: The article could have benefited from providing more concrete examples of successful collaborations or initiatives that China or other Asian countries have undertaken to reshape their global messaging. It could also have offered resources or references for readers interested in learning more about the topic, such as relevant studies, reports, or expert opinions.

The text describes a call for China to assert its narrative and engage more actively with Asian countries, aiming to counter Western influence and reshape global messaging. While this discourse may seem abstract, its implications for local communities and kinship bonds are significant and must be considered.

The proposed strategy of leveraging cultural symbols and fostering collaboration among scholars across Asia could, if successful, strengthen the sense of unity and shared identity within the Asian region. This could potentially enhance the protection and care of children and elders, as a stronger regional identity might encourage a more collective approach to these duties.

However, the risk of imposing a narrative, as warned by the political scientist, is a concern. If China were to adopt a heavy-handed approach, forcing its story onto other Asian countries, it could create divisions and erode trust between communities. This could lead to a breakdown of local responsibilities and a shift of family duties onto distant authorities, weakening the natural bonds of kinship and the ability of families to care for their own.

The idea of emerging economies playing a greater role in shaping international norms is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it could empower local communities and give them a stronger voice in global affairs, potentially leading to more equitable and sustainable practices that benefit families and the land. On the other hand, if this shift is driven by a desire for power and influence rather than a commitment to kinship and community, it could lead to further fragmentation and the neglect of fundamental duties.

The survival of families and communities depends on a delicate balance of power and responsibility. If the pursuit of global influence overshadows the protection of kin and the care of the land, it could lead to a situation where the very foundations of society are weakened. Birth rates could decline, elders may be neglected, and the next generation may lack the guidance and resources they need to thrive.

The consequences of unchecked pursuit of power and influence, without regard for local kinship bonds, could be dire. Families may become fragmented, unable to fulfill their duties to raise children and care for the vulnerable. Community trust may erode, and the stewardship of the land may be neglected. The continuity of the people and their connection to the land could be threatened, leading to a future where the survival of the clan and the protection of its legacy are at risk.

In conclusion, while the ideas presented in the text may offer opportunities for Asia to assert its voice and influence, they must be approached with caution and a deep respect for the fundamental duties of kinship. The survival of the people and the land depends on a strong sense of community, responsibility, and the fulfillment of personal duties. Any shift in global governance must prioritize these principles to ensure the long-term well-being and continuity of local communities and families.

"China is being encouraged to take control of its narrative..."

This sentence uses passive voice to hide who is encouraging China. It makes it seem like an anonymous force is pushing China to act, when in reality, it could be specific groups or individuals. This passive construction downplays the agency of those doing the encouraging.

"...Western discourse has dominated international conversations..."

Here, the word "dominated" is a strong, negative word. It makes Western influence seem aggressive and overwhelming, which could create a sense of fear or resentment towards Western powers. This word choice pushes a negative view of Western dominance.

The text conveys a range of emotions, primarily centered around a sense of urgency and the need for change. There is an underlying feeling of frustration and impatience with the current state of global discourse, where Western perspectives dominate, making it challenging for China and other Asian countries to assert their voices effectively. This frustration is evident in the experts' suggestions, as they advocate for a proactive approach to counter this imbalance.

The emotion of determination is also strong, as the experts and the political scientist emphasize the importance of taking control and shaping one's own narrative. They believe that by leveraging cultural symbols and collaborating with scholars, China can actively reshape its global image and messaging. This determination is a driving force, pushing for a more equal and diverse international conversation.

The text aims to create a sense of sympathy and understanding for China's position. By highlighting the challenges of projecting a voice in a Western-dominated discourse, the reader is encouraged to see the need for change from China's perspective. The emotion of determination then inspires action, suggesting that China's efforts to lead and create a new discourse are not only necessary but also a positive step towards a more balanced global governance system.

To persuade the reader, the writer employs a strategic use of language. For instance, the phrase "for too long" implies a sense of endurance and a need for change that has been long overdue. The comparison between China's approach and the United States' ready-made stories adds a layer of critique, suggesting that China's method is more nuanced and respectful of cultural differences. The writer also emphasizes the shifting power dynamics, particularly the U.S.'s focus on domestic issues, to create a sense of opportunity and the need for emerging economies to step up. This strategic framing guides the reader's attention and shapes their perception of the situation, making them more receptive to the idea of China's leadership in creating a new discourse.