The Supreme Court expressed serious concern over the rising number of student suicides at IIT Kharagpur and Sharda University. During a hearing, the court questioned whether these institutions had taken adequate steps to address this troubling issue. IIT Kharagpur informed the court that it had initiated reforms and strengthened mental health support in response to these incidents.

In its affidavit, IIT Kharagpur detailed a tragic event where a fourth-year mechanical engineering student died by suicide in his hostel room. The university stated that an FIR was registered promptly after the incident, following police procedures. This submission came after previous court directives required clarity on how swiftly police were notified about such cases.

IIT Kharagpur acknowledged the gravity of these tragedies and viewed them as catalysts for comprehensive institutional reform. The institution has implemented several measures aimed at improving student well-being, including overhauling its mental health framework and establishing specialized committees for support.

A ten-member committee was formed, consisting of psychologists, psychiatrists, legal professionals, educationists, and alumni to enhance emotional support among students. Additionally, the university launched a new framework called SETU which includes upgraded counseling services and an AI-enabled application for anonymous emotional check-ins. QR codes have been placed in hostels to provide students with quick access to emergency contacts and counseling services.

These actions reflect IIT Kharagpur's commitment to addressing mental health concerns proactively while promoting resilience among its students.

Original article

The article provides an update on a serious issue regarding student suicides at educational institutions. It offers some actionable information by detailing the steps taken by IIT Kharagpur to address mental health concerns. The institution's response includes forming a committee with experts and implementing a new framework, SETU, which aims to improve emotional support and access to counseling services. These measures provide a clear action plan for the university to tackle the issue.

However, the article lacks educational depth in explaining the root causes or systemic issues leading to these tragic events. It does not delve into the history or potential contributing factors, such as academic pressure, social dynamics, or other triggers. While it mentions the formation of a committee, it does not educate readers on the specific expertise or strategies these professionals bring to the table.

In terms of personal relevance, the topic is crucial as it directly impacts the well-being and safety of students, which is a matter of concern for anyone associated with these institutions, be it students, parents, or faculty. The article highlights the gravity of the situation and the need for institutional reform, making it relevant to those affected by or concerned about student mental health.

While the article does not explicitly provide a public service function, such as emergency contacts or official warnings, it does bring attention to a critical issue and the steps taken to address it. It serves as a form of public awareness, which can prompt further discussion and action.

The advice and steps outlined in the article are practical and realistic. The formation of a specialized committee and the implementation of a new framework are tangible actions that can be replicated by other institutions facing similar challenges. The use of QR codes and an AI-enabled application also demonstrates a modern and accessible approach to providing support.

In terms of long-term impact, the article suggests that IIT Kharagpur is taking proactive steps to create a lasting change in its mental health support systems. By overhauling its framework and establishing specialized committees, the institution is working towards a more resilient and supportive environment for its students.

Emotionally, the article may evoke a range of feelings. While it highlights a serious issue, it also provides hope by showcasing the institution's commitment to reform. The detailed actions taken by IIT Kharagpur can inspire similar institutions to follow suit and create a positive impact on student well-being.

The language used in the article is relatively neutral and does not appear to be driven by clickbait or sensationalism. It presents a balanced view of the situation and the steps taken, without exaggerating or sensationalizing the issue.

While the article provides an update on the institution's response, it misses an opportunity to educate readers on the broader context and potential solutions. It could have included more depth by exploring the mental health challenges faced by students in such institutions, citing research or expert opinions, and offering insights into effective strategies for prevention and support. Additionally, providing resources or contact information for students or parents seeking help would have added practical value.

In conclusion, the article offers some actionable steps and a sense of hope, but it could have provided more educational depth and practical resources to truly empower readers to take action or seek support.

The described situation, where institutions like IIT Kharagpur address rising student suicides, presents a complex challenge that impacts the strength and survival of families and local communities.

The issue of student suicides, particularly among young people, is a grave concern as it directly affects the continuity and well-being of families. When a young person takes their own life, it not only breaks the natural duty of parents to raise and protect their children but also leaves a void that can disrupt the family's stability and future. Such tragedies can lead to a sense of loss and despair, affecting the mental health and resilience of the entire family unit.

The response of IIT Kharagpur, while commendable in its efforts to address mental health concerns, must be carefully evaluated for its impact on family responsibilities and community trust. The formation of specialized committees and the implementation of new frameworks like SETU are steps in the right direction, as they aim to provide emotional support and improve student well-being. However, the effectiveness of these measures in restoring family trust and ensuring the safety of students must be closely monitored.

The placement of QR codes in hostels, while innovative, should not replace the personal duty of elders and community members to actively care for and protect the vulnerable. While technology can assist, it should not be seen as a substitute for human connection and responsibility. The onus is on the community and the institution to foster an environment where students feel supported and valued, and where they can freely express their emotions without fear of judgment or isolation.

The issue of student suicides also raises questions about the broader community's ability to care for and nurture its youth. The loss of young lives to suicide is a failure of the community to uphold its duty to protect and guide the next generation. It is a failure that can lead to a breakdown of trust and a sense of powerlessness, especially among parents and elders who feel they have no control over the well-being of their children.

Furthermore, the institutional response, while necessary, should not shift the primary responsibility for child-rearing and elder care onto distant authorities or impersonal systems. The natural duties of parents and extended family members to raise children and care for elders must be upheld and strengthened. The community must work together to create an environment where families feel supported and empowered to fulfill their responsibilities, rather than relying solely on external interventions.

In conclusion, the rising number of student suicides is a wake-up call for communities to reevaluate their priorities and strengthen the bonds of kinship. The described actions, while well-intentioned, must be carefully implemented to ensure they do not inadvertently weaken family structures or shift responsibilities away from local communities. If these issues are left unaddressed or if the described behaviors spread unchecked, the consequences could be dire: families may become fractured, the birth rate may decline, and the community's ability to care for its most vulnerable members may be severely compromised. It is through the restoration of trust, the reinforcement of personal duties, and the collective commitment to the well-being of the next generation that communities can ensure their survival and the stewardship of the land for future generations.

"The Supreme Court expressed serious concern..."

This sentence uses strong language like "serious concern" to make the court's reaction seem very important and intense. It makes the court seem like a powerful force, which can make people feel like the court is always right and knows best. This is a trick to make the court look good and make its opinion seem more important than it might be.

The text conveys a range of emotions, primarily centered around concern, sadness, and a sense of urgency to address the tragic issue of student suicides. These emotions are expressed through the language used by the Supreme Court, IIT Kharagpur, and the actions taken by the institution.

The Supreme Court's expression of "serious concern" sets the tone for the entire text, highlighting the gravity of the situation and the need for immediate action. This concern is further emphasized when the court questions the institutions about their response, indicating a sense of worry and a desire for accountability. The court's directives and the subsequent affidavit from IIT Kharagpur reflect a collective effort to address the issue and find solutions.

The sadness and tragedy are evident in the description of the student's death and the university's acknowledgment of these incidents as catalysts for reform. The use of words like "tragic," "died by suicide," and "tragedies" evoke a deep sense of loss and empathy for the students and their families. This emotional appeal is crucial in gaining support for the reforms and ensuring that the issue is not taken lightly.

The strength of these emotions lies in their ability to create a sense of shared responsibility and urgency. By expressing concern and sadness, the text aims to evoke a similar emotional response from the reader, fostering a sense of empathy and a desire to take action. The use of descriptive language and the detailed account of the university's response further emphasize the seriousness of the situation and the need for comprehensive solutions.

To persuade and guide the reader's reaction, the text employs a strategic use of language. The repetition of words like "tragic" and "suicides" emphasizes the severity of the issue, ensuring that the reader understands the scale and impact of the problem. The personal story of the fourth-year student's suicide adds a human element, making the issue more relatable and emotionally charged.

Additionally, the text compares the university's response to previous court directives, showcasing their proactive approach and commitment to change. This comparison not only highlights the institution's willingness to improve but also implies a potential shift in public opinion, encouraging readers to view IIT Kharagpur in a more positive light for taking such decisive action.

By employing these emotional strategies, the text aims to create a sense of unity and collective responsibility, inspiring readers to support the university's efforts and potentially driving similar actions in other institutions. The emotional appeal is a powerful tool to engage and motivate, ensuring that the issue of student mental health and well-being remains at the forefront of public discourse.