In Shenzhen, China, authorities have introduced new guidelines aimed at supporting innovators whose government-funded projects do not succeed. This policy, announced by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission, marks a significant step in encouraging technical innovation within the city.

The rules apply to universities, hospitals, and companies that receive state funding for their projects. They state that if failures occur without misconduct or abuse of power and if reasonable steps were taken to address any issues, then those involved should not face penalties. Specific situations where leniency could be granted include challenges due to technical difficulties or market changes that make products unviable.

The commission emphasized the importance of fostering a culture where researchers feel free to explore new ideas without fear of negative consequences from failed attempts. It also highlighted the need for a long-term strategy to mitigate losses from unsuccessful innovations while encouraging significant scientific advancements.

Original article

The article provides an overview of a new policy implemented by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission, which aims to support innovators and foster a culture of innovation.

Actionable Information: While the article does not provide specific steps or instructions for readers to take, it does inform them about the existence of this supportive policy. It could encourage innovators and researchers to explore new ideas and take risks, knowing there is a safety net in place.

Educational Depth: The article offers a deeper understanding of the city's approach to innovation and its commitment to supporting research and development. It explains the reasons behind the policy, highlighting the need to encourage exploration and mitigate losses. However, it may not provide extensive details on the implementation or the specific criteria for leniency.

Personal Relevance: For individuals involved in research and innovation, particularly those in Shenzhen, this policy could have a significant impact. It may encourage a more experimental mindset and reduce the fear of failure, potentially leading to more innovative projects. For the general public, it showcases the city's commitment to fostering an innovative environment, which could have long-term benefits for the local economy and society.

Public Service Function: The article serves a public service by bringing attention to this progressive policy. It informs the public about the city's efforts to create a supportive environment for innovators, which could attract talent and investment. However, it does not provide immediate practical tools or resources for the public to use.

Practicality of Advice: The policy itself is a practical step towards creating an innovative ecosystem. It offers a real-world example of how cities can encourage and support research and development. However, the article does not delve into the practical aspects of how this policy will be implemented or the specific processes innovators can follow.

Long-Term Impact: By implementing this policy, Shenzhen is taking a long-term view of innovation and its potential benefits. It aims to create an environment where innovators can thrive and contribute to the city's growth. This could have lasting positive effects on the city's reputation, economy, and overall development.

Emotional/Psychological Impact: The article may inspire a sense of hope and encouragement for innovators, especially those who have faced setbacks. It could motivate them to continue pursuing their ideas and not be discouraged by failures. For the general public, it may foster a positive perception of the city's forward-thinking approach.

Clickbait/Ad-Driven Words: The article does not appear to use sensational or misleading language. It presents the information in a straightforward manner, focusing on the policy's benefits and implications.

Missed Chances to Teach/Guide: The article could have benefited from providing more detailed information on the implementation of the policy. It could have included examples of how similar policies have worked in other cities or regions, or it could have offered insights from experts on the potential impact and challenges. Additionally, including a list of resources or contacts for innovators to access would have been a valuable addition.

The introduction of guidelines to support innovators, even in the face of failure, can have both positive and negative implications for local communities and kinship bonds.

On the positive side, this policy encourages a culture of exploration and innovation, which can lead to significant scientific advancements and potential benefits for the community. It allows researchers and innovators to take risks, learn from their mistakes, and continue to contribute to the collective knowledge and progress of the clan. This freedom to explore new ideas without fear of severe consequences can foster a sense of trust and responsibility within the community, as individuals are empowered to pursue their passions and contribute to the greater good.

However, there are potential pitfalls that could weaken family and community bonds. If the policy is not carefully implemented, it may inadvertently create an environment where certain individuals or groups take advantage of the leniency, neglecting their duties and responsibilities towards their kin. For instance, if innovators consistently fail without facing any consequences, it could lead to a lack of accountability and a disregard for the long-term survival of the community. This may result in a shift of family duties and responsibilities onto external authorities, eroding the natural bonds and duties of parents and extended family members.

Additionally, the policy's focus on technical innovation may distract from the fundamental duties of procreation and the care of the next generation. If the pursuit of innovation becomes an all-consuming endeavor, it could lead to a decline in birth rates and a neglect of the vulnerable, especially children and elders. This shift in priorities could have severe consequences for the continuity of the clan and the stewardship of the land, as the community's future and its ability to thrive are directly tied to the health and well-being of its youngest and oldest members.

Furthermore, the policy's emphasis on technical difficulties and market changes as reasons for leniency could potentially create a culture of excuse-making, where personal responsibility is diminished. This could lead to a breakdown of trust within the community, as individuals may question the integrity and commitment of those who consistently fail without facing any repercussions.

To maintain the strength of kinship bonds and ensure the survival of the community, it is essential that the policy is implemented with clear guidelines and accountability measures. Innovators should be encouraged to learn from their failures and contribute to the collective knowledge, but they must also understand the importance of their duties towards their kin and the community at large.

If the described ideas and behaviors spread unchecked, the consequences could be dire. The community may face a decline in birth rates, a breakdown of family structures, and a loss of trust and responsibility within kinship bonds. The stewardship of the land and the care of future generations would be severely compromised, threatening the very survival of the clan and the continuity of their ancestral duties. It is imperative that local communities remain vigilant and ensure that any policies or behaviors uphold the fundamental principles of family protection, procreative continuity, and local responsibility.

"They state that if failures occur without misconduct or abuse of power and if reasonable steps were taken to address any issues, then those involved should not face penalties."

This sentence uses passive voice to downplay the potential consequences of failure. It suggests that penalties are not the norm and are only applied in cases of misconduct or abuse of power. By using passive language, it creates a sense of leniency and forgiveness, making it seem like failures are not a big deal.

The text conveys a range of emotions, primarily centered around the theme of encouragement and support for innovators.

The emotion of relief is evident throughout the text. This feeling is directed towards the innovators, as the new guidelines assure them that they will not face penalties for honest failures. The rules specifically mention that researchers can explore new ideas without fear, which is a powerful message of reassurance. This relief is a strong emotion, as it alleviates the anxiety often associated with potential failures and the fear of consequences. It serves to create a positive and supportive environment, encouraging innovators to take risks and pursue their ideas without the burden of constant worry.

Another emotion that appears is optimism. The text emphasizes the potential for significant scientific advancements, which is an optimistic outlook on the future of innovation in Shenzhen. This emotion is subtle but powerful, as it inspires a sense of hope and possibility. By highlighting the long-term strategy and the potential for great achievements, the message aims to motivate and inspire innovators to continue their work, knowing that their efforts are valued and supported.

The text also conveys a sense of fairness and justice. The guidelines ensure that penalties are not imposed on those who have acted honestly and taken reasonable steps. This emotion of fairness is important, as it builds trust between the authorities and the innovators. It shows that the system is designed to be reasonable and just, which is crucial for maintaining a positive relationship and encouraging collaboration.

To persuade readers, the writer employs several emotional techniques. One notable strategy is the use of specific situations where leniency could be granted. By providing examples, such as technical difficulties or market changes, the writer makes the guidelines more relatable and understandable. This personalizes the message, allowing readers to envision themselves or their peers in these situations and thus feel more connected to the issue.

Additionally, the writer emphasizes the importance of fostering a culture of exploration and freedom. By using phrases like "feel free to explore" and "without fear of negative consequences," the writer creates a vision of a supportive and liberating environment. This emotional appeal is powerful, as it speaks to the human desire for creativity and freedom, and it motivates readers to support and embrace such a culture.

In summary, the text skillfully employs emotions to guide the reader's reaction, creating a supportive and optimistic atmosphere for innovators. By addressing fears, highlighting potential, and emphasizing fairness, the message aims to inspire and encourage, ultimately shaping a positive perception of the new guidelines and their impact on innovation in Shenzhen.