Telangana presented its case to the Brijesh Kumar Tribunal (KWDT-II), highlighting how it has historically been denied gravity flows of water in the Krishna Basin. The state argued that it was forced to rely on lift irrigation schemes due to these restrictions, which are crucial for its water supply. Senior counsel C.S. Vaidyanathan illustrated with maps how the reorganization of states in 1956 impacted water availability, resulting in a loss of approximately 174.3 tmc ft (thousand million cubic feet) of water that should have flowed into Telangana.

Vaidyanathan detailed ongoing projects such as the Srisailam Left Bank Canal and several lift irrigation schemes, emphasizing their importance and the need for assured water allocation, especially for drought-prone areas. He pointed out a past proposal from Karnataka regarding the Almatti dam height that could have benefited Telangana but was rejected by combined Andhra Pradesh at that time.

Additionally, he noted a reduction in land under the Nagarjunasagar Left Canal from 6.6 lakh acres to 5.4 lakh acres, which contradicts earlier approvals by the Planning Commission. The tribunal allowed Telangana additional time to continue its arguments on this matter over two more days scheduled for July 28 and 29.

Original article

The article provides an update on a legal case presented by Telangana to the Brijesh Kumar Tribunal, highlighting the state's water-related concerns and historical context.

Actionable Information: While the article does not offer immediate steps for readers to take, it provides an understanding of the ongoing legal process and the state's arguments, which could be relevant for those interested in water rights and regional politics.

Educational Depth: It offers a detailed look at the historical reorganization of states and its impact on water availability, explaining the loss of water resources and the need for assured water allocation. This depth of information is valuable for those seeking to understand the complexities of water management and regional development.

Personal Relevance: For residents of Telangana and neighboring states, the article has direct relevance, as it discusses water supply and irrigation, which are crucial for agriculture and daily life. Even for those outside the region, the case highlights broader issues of water rights and management, which are increasingly important in a world facing water scarcity.

Public Service Function: The article serves a public service by bringing attention to a legal case that has implications for water management and regional development. It informs readers about the ongoing proceedings and the state's arguments, which could influence future water policies and projects.

Practicality of Advice: As this is an update on a legal case, it does not provide practical advice but rather informs readers about the state's position and the tribunal's decision to allow additional time for arguments.

Long-Term Impact: By shedding light on the historical context and ongoing legal battle, the article contributes to a long-term understanding of water rights and management, which is essential for sustainable development and planning.

Emotional/Psychological Impact: While the article may not directly address emotional or psychological aspects, it provides a sense of agency and awareness, empowering readers to understand and potentially engage with issues of water rights and regional development.

Clickbait/Ad-driven Words: The language used in the article is factual and informative, without sensationalism or exaggeration.

Missed Chances to Teach/Guide: The article could have benefited from including more detailed explanations of the technical terms used, such as "gravity flows," "lift irrigation," and "tmc ft," to ensure a broader audience could understand the issues. Additionally, providing links to relevant resources or further reading materials could have enhanced the educational value for readers.

The described situation involves a dispute over water resources and their allocation, which has significant implications for the local communities and their ability to thrive and protect their kin.

The historical denial of gravity flows of water and the subsequent reliance on lift irrigation schemes creates an uneven playing field for communities within the Krishna Basin. This restriction on water access can directly impact the survival and well-being of families, especially in drought-prone areas. Water is a fundamental resource for agriculture, and without a reliable supply, families may struggle to produce sufficient food, leading to potential food insecurity and a threat to the health and development of children.

The reorganization of states in 1956, as highlighted by the maps presented, has resulted in a loss of water availability for Telangana. This loss of resources can disrupt the balance of power within communities, potentially leading to increased competition and conflict over limited water supplies. Such conflicts can fracture the trust and cooperation that are essential for the peaceful resolution of disputes and the maintenance of community cohesion.

The rejection of the proposal from Karnataka regarding the Almatti dam height further illustrates the potential for missed opportunities that could have benefited the people of Telangana. This rejection, made by a combined Andhra Pradesh, demonstrates a lack of consideration for the needs of the Telangana community and a potential neglect of their duty to protect and provide for their kin.

The reduction in land under the Nagarjunasagar Left Canal also contradicts earlier approvals, indicating a potential breach of trust and a failure to uphold commitments made to the community. This reduction in land availability can directly impact the ability of families to cultivate and provide for their own, potentially leading to increased dependence on external sources and a loss of self-sufficiency.

The described situation weakens the bonds of kinship and community by creating an environment of competition and potential conflict over resources. It diminishes the ability of families to provide for their own, potentially leading to increased vulnerability and a reliance on distant authorities for basic necessities. This shift in responsibility can fracture the natural duties of parents and extended family members to care for their own, as they may become increasingly reliant on external support.

If these ideas and behaviors spread unchecked, the consequences for local communities could be dire. Families may struggle to provide for their children, leading to malnourishment and a potential decline in birth rates, which would threaten the continuity of the people and their ability to steward the land. Community trust and cooperation may break down, leading to increased social fragmentation and a loss of the collective strength needed to protect the vulnerable and resolve conflicts peacefully.

The survival of the people and the protection of their land depend on a balanced approach to resource allocation, one that upholds the duties and responsibilities of kinship and community. It is essential that local communities have a say in decisions that impact their ability to thrive and that they are not subjected to rules and ideologies that erode their power to protect their own.

"The state argued that it was forced to rely on lift irrigation schemes due to these restrictions, which are crucial for its water supply."

This sentence shows a bias towards Telangana's perspective. It uses the word "forced," implying that someone or something else is at fault for the state's reliance on lift irrigation. This language puts the blame on external factors, potentially creating a sense of victimhood.

The text conveys a range of emotions, primarily centered around the state of Telangana's struggle for water resources and its historical grievances.

The emotion of frustration is evident as Telangana highlights its long-standing issue of being denied gravity flows of water in the Krishna Basin. This frustration is further emphasized by the state's reliance on lift irrigation schemes, which are described as crucial yet forced upon them due to these water restrictions. The use of words like "denied" and "forced" conveys a sense of injustice and exasperation.

There is also a hint of sadness and disappointment when the text mentions the loss of approximately 174.3 tmc ft of water, which should have flowed into Telangana. This loss is attributed to the reorganization of states in 1956, suggesting a sense of regret and a missed opportunity.

Anger and indignation are implied when the text refers to the past proposal from Karnataka regarding the Almatti dam height. The rejection of this proposal by the combined Andhra Pradesh is portrayed as a missed chance for Telangana to benefit, potentially fueling resentment.

Additionally, the text conveys a sense of urgency and determination as it details ongoing projects and the need for assured water allocation, especially for drought-prone areas. The emphasis on the importance of these projects and the request for additional time to present arguments suggest a strong will to fight for their water rights.

These emotions are strategically employed to evoke sympathy for Telangana's situation and to highlight the state's determination to address its water-related challenges. By presenting a narrative of historical injustice and ongoing struggles, the text aims to garner support and understanding for Telangana's cause.

The writer's choice of words, such as "denied," "forced," and "loss," is designed to evoke an emotional response, painting a picture of a state that has been wronged and is now fighting for its basic needs. The repetition of the word "water" throughout the text also serves to emphasize the centrality of this issue to Telangana's well-being.

By personalizing the issue through the use of phrases like "should have flowed into Telangana" and "combined Andhra Pradesh at that time," the writer creates a sense of connection and empathy, making the struggle more relatable and compelling. This strategic use of language and narrative techniques is aimed at persuading readers to see Telangana's perspective and potentially advocate for their cause.