In Bihar, nearly 66 lakh voters are expected to be excluded from the upcoming draft electoral roll, which is set to be published on August 1. This information comes from data released by the Election Commission of India on July 25, marking the end of the submission period for enumeration forms in a process known as Special Intensive Revision (SIR). Bihar's total number of voters was reported at over 7.89 crore.

The Election Commission stated that forms for approximately 7.23 crore electors have been received and digitized, ensuring their inclusion in the draft roll. However, local Booth Level Officers (BLOs) have identified around 22 lakh deceased voters, 7 lakh individuals registered at multiple locations, and about 35 lakh who have permanently migrated or cannot be located. Additionally, around 1.2 lakh enumeration forms are still pending.

From August 1 to September 1, any elector or political party can submit claims regarding wrongful exclusions or objections against ineligible entries in the draft roll. The lists of those who failed to fill out their forms or who are deceased will also be shared with major political parties in Bihar.

This electoral revision process has faced criticism from opposition parties, who view it as a potential precursor to implementing a National Register of Citizens through indirect means. The SIR has been challenged in court with a hearing scheduled soon after these developments were announced.

Original article

The article provides an update on the upcoming electoral roll draft in Bihar, India, and the potential impact on voters.

Actionable Information: While the article does not offer specific steps for readers to take, it does inform them about the upcoming publication of the draft electoral roll and the process for submitting claims or objections. This knowledge can prompt readers to take action, such as checking their voter registration status or preparing to submit claims if needed.

Educational Depth: It offers a deeper understanding of the electoral revision process, explaining the reasons for exclusions and providing context on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. This includes the identification of deceased voters, multiple registrations, and migrants, along with the pending enumeration forms. The article also highlights the potential legal challenges and opposition party concerns, adding further depth to the topic.

Personal Relevance: The topic is highly relevant to the lives of voters in Bihar, as it directly impacts their ability to participate in the democratic process. The potential exclusion of nearly 66 lakh voters could have significant implications for their political rights and representation. Additionally, the article's mention of sharing lists with political parties may affect how voters are approached or engaged by these parties.

Public Service Function: The article serves a public service by informing voters about the upcoming draft roll and the process for ensuring their inclusion. It also highlights the potential for legal challenges and opposition concerns, which are important for voters to be aware of. However, it could have provided more direct guidance or resources for voters to take action, such as links to official websites or contact information for relevant authorities.

Practicality of Advice: The advice provided is practical in the sense that it informs readers about the process and potential issues. However, it does not offer specific, detailed instructions on how to navigate the system or what steps to take if one's name is missing from the draft roll. More practical guidance could have been included to empower readers to take action.

Long-Term Impact: The article's focus on the electoral roll and its potential impact on voter participation has long-term implications for democracy and political representation in Bihar. Ensuring an accurate and inclusive electoral roll is crucial for the future of the region's political landscape.

Emotional/Psychological Impact: The article may cause some readers to feel anxious or concerned about their voter registration status, especially if they are among the excluded voters. However, it also provides a sense of empowerment by informing readers about their rights and the process for ensuring inclusion.

Clickbait/Ad-driven Words: The article does not appear to use sensational or misleading language to grab attention. It presents the information in a straightforward manner, focusing on the facts and potential implications.

Missed Chances to Teach or Guide: The article could have been more helpful by providing clear, step-by-step instructions on how to check one's voter registration status and what to do if there are issues. It could also have included links to official resources or contact information for voter assistance. Additionally, offering more context on the potential impact of the National Register of Citizens and how it relates to the electoral roll could have further educated readers.

The described electoral process and its potential consequences reveal a concerning shift away from the fundamental duties and responsibilities that have long sustained human communities.

The exclusion of nearly 66 lakh voters, many of whom are identified as deceased, migrated, or unregistered, poses a threat to the integrity of the electoral roll and, by extension, the democratic process itself. This exclusion risks disenfranchising a significant portion of the population, undermining their ability to participate in and influence decisions that affect their lives and communities.

The impact of such exclusions is particularly severe for the most vulnerable members of society, including the elderly and those who have migrated. The elderly, who are often the guardians of traditional knowledge and wisdom, may find themselves without a voice in the political process, further marginalizing their role in society. Migrants, who have already faced the challenges of displacement, may now be denied the right to participate in the political life of their new communities, hindering their integration and sense of belonging.

The potential implementation of a National Register of Citizens, as feared by opposition parties, could further exacerbate these issues. Such a register, if implemented without proper consideration for local kinship bonds and community dynamics, could lead to the exclusion of entire families and communities, severing the ties that bind them together and weakening their collective resilience.

The criticism of this process by opposition parties highlights a growing disconnect between centralized authorities and the local communities they are meant to serve. This disconnect threatens to erode the trust and responsibility that are essential for the survival and well-being of families and communities.

The potential for conflict and division is also heightened by the criticism and legal challenges surrounding the electoral revision process. This conflict could further distract from the core responsibilities of protecting kin, caring for the vulnerable, and stewarding the land.

The long-term consequences of these ideas and behaviors, if left unchecked, are dire. They threaten to weaken the fabric of communities, diminish birth rates, and disrupt the intergenerational transfer of knowledge and care. Without strong families and communities, the survival of the people and the stewardship of the land are put at risk.

The ancestral duty to protect life and balance demands that we recognize the fundamental importance of local kinship bonds and community responsibilities. It is through these bonds that we ensure the continuity of our people, the protection of our vulnerable, and the sustainable use of our resources.

If these ideas and behaviors spread unchecked, we risk a future where families are fractured, communities are divided, and the land is neglected. The survival of our people and the health of our communities depend on our ability to uphold our ancestral duties and responsibilities, and to reject ideas and behaviors that undermine these essential bonds.

"In Bihar, nearly 66 lakh voters are expected to be excluded..." This sentence uses a passive voice construction, which can obscure who is responsible for the exclusion. It does not explicitly state who is excluding these voters, potentially shifting blame away from the authorities. The use of "expected to be excluded" suggests a predetermined outcome, which may not reflect the actual process or intentions.

"The Election Commission stated that forms for approximately 7.23 crore electors have been received..." Here, the focus is on the positive action of receiving and digitizing forms, which could imply efficiency and progress. However, it does not mention the challenges or potential issues with the process, such as the large number of pending forms or the identification of deceased voters.

"This electoral revision process has faced criticism from opposition parties..." The phrase "opposition parties" implies a political bias and a potential divide between different political groups. It frames the criticism as coming solely from the opposition, which may downplay any concerns raised by other stakeholders or the public.

"The SIR has been challenged in court with a hearing scheduled soon..." By stating that the SIR process has been "challenged," the text suggests a negative perception and potential legal issues. It does not provide context or details about the challenges, leaving room for interpretation and potentially creating a sense of uncertainty or controversy.

"Bihar's total number of voters was reported at over 7.89 crore." The use of the word "reported" here can imply uncertainty or a lack of official confirmation. It may create a sense of doubt about the accuracy of the voter count, especially when compared to the more definitive statement about the number of forms received.

The text primarily conveys a sense of concern and potential worry, especially among opposition parties, regarding the upcoming electoral roll and its implications. This emotion is evident in the criticism leveled by opposition parties, who view the process as a potential threat, suggesting an indirect implementation of a National Register of Citizens. The word "criticism" itself carries a negative connotation, indicating a sense of disapproval and unease.

The strength of this emotion is moderate to high, as it directly challenges the integrity of the electoral process and hints at potential manipulation. The opposition's concern is further emphasized by their decision to challenge the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in court, suggesting a serious and urgent matter. This emotion serves to raise awareness and potentially mobilize action, as it implies a need for vigilance and scrutiny of the electoral roll.

The writer's use of emotional language is subtle but effective. Phrases like "potential precursor" and "indirect means" imply a hidden agenda, creating a sense of suspicion and unease. By using these phrases, the writer suggests that something sinister might be at play, which is an effective strategy to capture the reader's attention and encourage them to question the process.

Additionally, the mention of "wrongful exclusions" and "ineligible entries" in the draft roll further adds to the emotional appeal. These phrases evoke a sense of injustice and the potential for unfair treatment, which could motivate readers to take action or at least pay closer attention to the electoral process. The writer's choice of words here is strategic, as it personalizes the issue, making it more relatable and emotionally engaging for the audience.

In summary, the text's emotional undertone is one of concern and potential distrust, which is skillfully conveyed through the use of specific language and the suggestion of hidden agendas. This emotional strategy is designed to capture the reader's interest, encourage critical thinking, and potentially inspire action or further investigation into the electoral process.