The Congress party reacted with surprise to the resignation of Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar, describing it as "totally unexpected" and suggesting there may be more behind the decision than is apparent. Dhankhar submitted his resignation letter to President Droupadi Murmu, citing health reasons and stating he would step down immediately. Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh noted that he had spoken with Dhankhar just hours before his resignation, expressing concern over the sudden nature of the announcement.

Ramesh emphasized that while health must be prioritized, there seems to be more to this situation than meets the eye. He mentioned that Dhankhar had planned significant meetings and announcements related to parliamentary business and the judiciary shortly before resigning. Ramesh urged both Dhankhar to reconsider his decision and Prime Minister Narendra Modi to persuade him otherwise for the nation's benefit.

Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal praised Dhankhar as a patriot who should be respected for his choice based on health grounds, urging others not to speculate further on the matter. He reflected on their good relationship despite differing political ideologies.

Dhankhar, who took office in August 2022 with a term set until 2027, resigned at a critical time as Parliament was set to begin its Monsoon Session.

Original article

This article does not provide any immediate actionable information for readers. It does not offer steps or instructions that people can take or follow. While it mentions Dhankhar's resignation and the reactions of various political figures, it does not provide any tools or resources that readers can utilize.

In terms of educational depth, the article provides some context and background on the resignation of Vice President Dhankhar. It explains the timing of the resignation, Dhankhar's term, and the reactions of Congress and other political figures. However, it does not delve deeply into the reasons behind the resignation or provide a comprehensive analysis of the situation. The article mainly focuses on the reactions and statements of political leaders, rather than exploring the underlying causes or implications.

The topic of the article has some personal relevance for those interested in Indian politics and the functioning of the country's government. It may impact how people perceive the stability and functioning of the political system, especially during a critical time when Parliament was set to begin its session. However, for the average person, the direct impact on daily life is limited, as it primarily concerns political affairs and the internal workings of the government.

The article does not serve a public service function in the sense of providing official warnings, safety advice, or emergency contacts. It merely reports on the resignation and the subsequent reactions, without offering any practical guidance or assistance to the public. While it may inform readers about a significant political development, it does not actively help or protect the public in any tangible way.

The advice and suggestions provided in the article are not particularly practical or actionable. For example, Jairam Ramesh's urging of Dhankhar to reconsider his decision and Modi to persuade him otherwise is not something that the average reader can directly influence or implement. The article does not offer any clear steps or strategies for the public to engage with or address the situation.

In terms of long-term impact, the article does not provide any lasting value or help people with future planning or decision-making. It focuses on a specific, immediate event and its short-term implications, without offering any insights or actions that could have a positive, lasting effect on readers' lives or the broader society.

Psychologically, the article may evoke curiosity or interest in some readers, especially those following Indian politics. However, it does not provide any emotional support, guidance, or strategies to help people deal with the situation or its potential consequences. The article primarily presents information and reactions, without offering any tools or frameworks for readers to process or respond to the news.

Finally, the article does not employ clickbait or sensational language. It presents the information in a straightforward manner, without using dramatic or exaggerated language to attract attention. While it may not be an in-depth analysis, it does not resort to sensationalism or exaggeration to engage readers.

The described events reveal a deep fracture in the moral fabric that binds families and communities together. When a leader, such as Vice President Dhankhar, resigns abruptly, it creates a sense of uncertainty and distrust within the social order. The sudden nature of his departure, especially during a critical parliamentary session, suggests a lack of commitment to the collective well-being and a potential disregard for the responsibilities entrusted to him.

Congress' reaction, expressing surprise and suspicion, further highlights the breakdown of trust. Their concern over the "unexpected" resignation and the suggestion of hidden motives indicate a breach of the transparent and honest communication that is essential for maintaining strong social bonds. The Congress general secretary's emphasis on health while also insinuating other reasons demonstrates a conflict between the stated and implied intentions, a form of hypocrisy that erodes the foundation of trust.

The impact of such actions extends beyond the political arena. When leaders prioritize personal interests or undisclosed agendas over their duties, it sets a dangerous precedent for the community. It teaches that loyalty and commitment to the collective can be easily discarded, undermining the very principles that hold families and communities together. This behavior can lead to a culture of self-interest, where personal gain takes precedence over the welfare of the group, including the protection of children, the care of elders, and the peaceful resolution of conflicts.

The absence of clear personal duties and the shifting of responsibilities onto distant authorities or institutions weakens the natural kinship bond. It encourages a reliance on external forces rather than fostering a sense of collective responsibility and stewardship. This shift can result in a society where individuals become detached from their local communities, leading to a breakdown of social cohesion and a decline in the care and protection of the vulnerable.

Furthermore, the resignation of a key figure like Dhankhar at a critical time for Parliament could disrupt the peaceful resolution of conflicts and the defense of the vulnerable. His absence may hinder the effective governance and decision-making processes that are essential for the well-being of the community, potentially leaving gaps in the protection and support systems for those in need.

The real consequence of such behavior, if left unchecked, is the erosion of the moral order that has sustained families and communities for generations. It weakens the bonds of trust, responsibility, and shared duty, leading to a society where personal interests prevail over collective welfare. This shift can result in a decline in birth rates, as the care and protection of children and the respect for elders are diminished. It can also lead to a society where the land and its resources are exploited without regard for the future generations, threatening the very survival and continuity of the people.

In conclusion, the described events represent a departure from the timeless wisdom that values kinship and respect for the land. If this behavior spreads, it will further erode the social fabric, weakening the protective shield that families and communities provide. It is essential for individuals to recognize their personal responsibilities and the impact of their actions on the collective well-being. Restoring trust and upholding clear personal duties is crucial for the survival and prosperity of the people and the land they share.

The text shows political bias favoring the Congress party. The Congress party's reaction is described as a surprise, suggesting they are victims of an unexpected event. This frames the resignation as a negative for the party. "Totally unexpected" emphasizes their shock and implies a lack of control. The Congress party's perspective is centered, making it seem like the main focus.

The text conveys a range of emotions, primarily surprise, concern, and respect, which guide the reader's reaction and shape the overall message.

Surprise is the initial emotion expressed by the Congress party upon learning of Vice President Dhankhar's sudden resignation. The word "unexpected" emphasizes this emotion, suggesting an element of shock and unpreparedness. This surprise is further highlighted by Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh's statement, as he had spoken to Dhankhar just hours before and was unaware of any impending decision. The strength of this emotion is moderate, as it is a reaction to an unexpected event, but it serves to capture the reader's attention and set the tone for the rest of the text.

Concern is another key emotion, particularly evident in Ramesh's statement. He expresses worry about Dhankhar's health, which is a valid and empathetic concern. However, he also hints at a deeper concern, suggesting that there might be other, undisclosed reasons behind the resignation. This concern is subtle but powerful, as it implies a potential mystery or intrigue surrounding the decision. It serves to keep the reader engaged, wondering about the true motives behind Dhankhar's move.

Respect is shown by Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal, who praises Dhankhar as a patriot and urges others to respect his choice. Sibal's tone is dignified and appreciative, reflecting a genuine admiration for Dhankhar's decision, despite their differing political ideologies. This emotion adds a layer of sincerity to the text, suggesting that even political opponents can find common ground in respecting personal choices.

These emotions work together to guide the reader's reaction. The surprise and concern create a sense of intrigue, encouraging the reader to want to know more about the circumstances surrounding Dhankhar's resignation. The respect shown by Sibal adds a layer of dignity to the situation, suggesting that even in the face of political differences, certain personal choices deserve admiration.

The writer uses emotional language to persuade by emphasizing the unexpected nature of the resignation, which creates a sense of mystery and keeps the reader engaged. The use of words like "unexpected" and "sudden" heightens the emotional impact, making the reader feel a sense of urgency and curiosity. By repeating the idea of surprise and concern, the writer maintains a consistent emotional tone throughout the text, ensuring that the reader remains invested in the story.

Additionally, the writer employs a personal touch by including quotes from key figures like Ramesh and Sibal. This adds a human element to the story, making it more relatable and engaging. By sharing their personal reactions and reflections, the writer invites the reader to connect with these individuals and their emotions, further enhancing the persuasive impact of the text.