Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi, accusing him of attempting to undermine the Constitution. Speaking at an event in Mysuru, Kharge expressed concern over the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) allegedly trying to alter or dilute the Constitution established by B.R. Ambedkar. He emphasized that citizens would not permit any changes to this foundational document, which has allowed Modi to rise politically.

Kharge also pointed out what he described as Modi's unfulfilled promises, such as providing ₹15 lakh (approximately $18,000) to every citizen and creating two crore (20 million) jobs annually. He argued that there has been no real development under Modi's leadership and accused him of misleading the public with false claims.

Highlighting economic disparities, Kharge noted that a small percentage of India's population controls a significant portion of the nation's wealth while many remain impoverished. He referenced comments from senior BJP leader Nitin Gadkari about increasing poverty levels in contrast to Modi’s assertions regarding income equality in India.

Additionally, Kharge criticized Modi for not visiting Manipur during its ongoing troubles while having time for numerous international trips. This lack of engagement with local issues further fueled his argument against the current government's priorities and effectiveness.

Original article (mysuru) (manipur)

Here is my assessment of the article's value to the reader:

Actionable Information: The article does not provide any immediate actions or steps for the reader to take. It is more of an informative piece, detailing the criticisms and accusations made by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge against Prime Minister Narendra Modi. There are no tools or resources mentioned that could be of direct use to the reader.

Educational Depth: It offers some educational value by providing insights into the political landscape of India and the ongoing debates and concerns surrounding the Constitution and the current government's performance. The article explains Kharge's arguments, which touch on constitutional issues, economic disparities, and the government's priorities, giving a broader understanding of these topics. However, it does not delve deeply into the historical context or provide extensive analysis.

Personal Relevance: The topic of the article is highly relevant to Indian citizens, especially those interested in politics and the functioning of their government. It directly impacts their understanding of the political climate, the potential changes to the Constitution, and the performance of their elected leaders. For non-Indian readers, the article may still provide an educational insight into a different political system, but the personal relevance is reduced.

Public Service Function: While the article does not explicitly offer public service information such as emergency contacts or safety advice, it serves a public function by bringing attention to the concerns and criticisms of a prominent political figure. It informs the public about potential issues with the government's policies and actions, which is a crucial part of a functioning democracy.

Practicality of Advice: As the article primarily focuses on criticisms and accusations, it does not offer practical advice or steps that readers can take. The information is more about raising awareness and understanding the political discourse rather than providing actionable guidance.

Long-Term Impact: The article's long-term impact is difficult to assess. It may contribute to ongoing debates and discussions, potentially leading to policy changes or influencing future political decisions. However, without specific actions or plans outlined, it is hard to determine its lasting impact on the political landscape or the lives of citizens.

Emotional or Psychological Impact: The article is likely to evoke emotional responses, especially among those who align with Kharge's criticisms. It may strengthen the resolve of those opposed to the current government's actions and provide a sense of validation. However, for those who support the government, it could create feelings of defensiveness or anger. The article does not offer strategies for emotional management or coping, focusing more on the presentation of information.

Clickbait or Ad-Driven Words: The article does not appear to use sensational or clickbait-style language. It presents the information in a straightforward manner, focusing on the content of Kharge's speech and the issues it raises. There is no overt attempt to manipulate the reader's emotions or attention through dramatic language or exaggerated claims.

In summary, the article provides educational value and raises important political concerns, but it does not offer immediate actions or practical advice for readers. It serves to inform and engage the public in political discourse, which is valuable, but its impact on individual lives and long-term effects are less tangible.

"He emphasized that citizens would not permit any changes to this foundational document, which has allowed Modi to rise politically."

This sentence uses virtue signaling. It suggests that the citizens are united and have a strong stance against any changes to the Constitution, which is a positive trait. The use of the word "foundational" also implies that the Constitution is a cornerstone of their society, adding to its importance.

The text conveys a range of emotions, primarily from Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, as he criticizes Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP-led government. The underlying emotion throughout the text is anger, which is expressed through Kharge's strong and accusatory language. He is angry about the alleged attempts to undermine the Constitution, a foundational document that he believes has been instrumental in Modi's political rise. This anger is further fueled by Modi's unfulfilled promises, which Kharge sees as a betrayal of the public's trust.

Kharge's speech also evokes a sense of concern and worry, especially regarding the economic disparities in India. He highlights the contrast between the wealthy few and the impoverished many, implying a lack of progress and equality under Modi's leadership. This emotional appeal aims to create a sense of sympathy and solidarity with the struggling citizens, positioning Kharge as a champion of the people's interests.

The mention of Nitin Gadkari's comments about increasing poverty levels adds a layer of irony and disappointment, as it contradicts Modi's claims of income equality. This emotional contrast is a powerful tool to undermine Modi's credibility and highlight the government's perceived failures.

Additionally, Kharge's criticism of Modi's lack of engagement with Manipur's troubles evokes a sense of frustration and disappointment. By pointing out Modi's international travels while ignoring local issues, Kharge implies that the government's priorities are misaligned, further fueling the anger and concern already expressed.

The emotional language and strategic use of contrast and irony in this text are designed to persuade the audience. By evoking strong emotions, Kharge aims to influence public opinion and potentially sway voters away from the BJP. The repetition of ideas, such as the unfulfilled promises and the contrast between wealth and poverty, reinforces the emotional impact and makes the message more memorable.

Overall, the text employs a strategic blend of anger, concern, and disappointment to shape the reader's perception of the BJP-led government, aiming to inspire action and change in the political landscape.