A woman in Uttar Pradesh was arrested for allegedly killing her seven-year-old daughter and then going out to party with her live-in partner. The incident occurred on the night of July 13, 2025, when the girl reportedly insisted on staying with her father. In response, the mother and her partner are accused of beating and strangling the child before hiding her body in a bed box.

After committing the crime, they left home to enjoy a night out, visiting multiple locations before returning early the next morning. Upon their return, they attempted to mask the smell of decomposition using air fresheners and air conditioning. The mother then falsely reported that her estranged husband had killed their daughter.

Police investigations revealed contradictions in her story, supported by CCTV footage and witness statements. Both Roshni Khan and Udit Jaiswal were subsequently arrested after evidence disproved their claims. The motive behind the murder appears to be linked to Roshni's desire to frame her husband for the crime while also wanting control over property that belonged to him.

The postmortem confirmed that the child died from suffocation about one or two days prior to its examination. Neighbors described Roshni as someone who frequently engaged in nightlife activities despite objections from family members, often leaving her daughter alone at home during these outings.

Original article

Here is an analysis of the article's value to a normal person in real life:

Actionable Information: The article does not provide any immediate actions or steps that readers can take. It primarily focuses on narrating the tragic incident and the subsequent investigation, leaving readers with no clear guidance or instructions.

Educational Depth: While the article presents a detailed account of the crime and the investigation, it lacks educational depth. It does not delve into the broader context of child protection, parental responsibilities, or legal systems. Readers are left with a basic understanding of the events but without a deeper insight into the underlying issues.

Personal Relevance: The topic of child abuse and murder is undoubtedly relevant to everyone's lives, as it raises concerns about the safety and well-being of children. However, the article fails to connect this incident to practical steps individuals can take to prevent such tragedies or support affected families. It does not offer any personal guidance or resources for readers to engage with.

Public Service Function: The article does not serve a direct public service function. It does not provide official warnings, safety guidelines, or emergency contacts. Instead, it primarily serves as a news report, detailing the investigation and its outcomes. While it raises awareness about a serious issue, it does not actively contribute to public safety or provide practical tools for the community.

Practicality of Advice: As mentioned, the article does not offer any advice or tips. Therefore, the practicality of advice cannot be assessed.

Long-Term Impact: The article's long-term impact is limited. It does not propose any sustainable solutions or initiatives to address the root causes of child abuse or improve child protection systems. While it may spark discussions and raise awareness, it does not provide a roadmap for lasting change or empower readers to take meaningful action.

Emotional or Psychological Impact: The article is likely to evoke strong emotions, such as sadness, anger, or shock, due to the nature of the crime. However, it does not offer any psychological support or guidance for readers who may be affected by the story. It fails to provide coping mechanisms or resources for those struggling with similar issues or concerns.

Clickbait or Ad-Driven Words: The article does not employ clickbait tactics or sensationalize the story to attract attention. It maintains a factual tone throughout, focusing on presenting the events and the investigation process.

In summary, while the article serves an important purpose in raising awareness about a tragic incident, it falls short in providing actionable information, educational depth, and practical guidance. It fails to empower readers with tools or resources to address similar issues or contribute to long-term solutions. As a result, its value to a normal person in real life is limited, leaving readers with a sense of helplessness rather than empowerment.

The actions described in this text reveal a profound betrayal of the sacred bonds that hold families and communities together. The murder of an innocent child by her own mother, driven by personal desires and a twisted sense of control, is an abomination that shatters the very foundation of trust and responsibility.

Roshni Khan's actions demonstrate a complete disregard for the most basic duties of motherhood and kinship. Instead of nurturing and protecting her daughter, she chose violence and deceit, prioritizing her own desires over the life of her child. This is a violation of the most fundamental principles that bind families and ensure their survival.

The attempt to frame her estranged husband further compounds this betrayal. Roshni not only took the life of her daughter but also sought to destroy the reputation and peace of her former partner, a man who, by all accounts, was not present and had no involvement in this heinous act. This is a clear abuse of power and a manipulation of truth, which, if left unchecked, erodes the very fabric of community trust and justice.

The description of Roshni's frequent engagement in nightlife activities, despite objections and the neglect of her daughter, highlights a selfish and irresponsible lifestyle. This behavior not only endangers the child's well-being but also sets a poor example for the community, normalizing a disregard for familial duties and the care of one's kin.

If such behavior were to spread unchecked, it would lead to the decay of family structures and the erosion of community bonds. Children, the most vulnerable members of our society, would be at constant risk, with their safety and well-being compromised by the selfish actions of adults. The land, too, would suffer, as the lack of care and responsibility would extend beyond personal relationships to the stewardship of the environment.

To restore trust and duty, Roshni must first acknowledge her grave mistake and the irreparable harm she has caused. She must make amends by accepting full responsibility for her actions and facing the consequences. This includes ensuring that her daughter receives a proper burial and that her memory is honored. Additionally, Roshni should offer restitution to her former husband, not only to repair the damage done to his reputation but also to demonstrate a commitment to truth and justice.

The real consequence of such behavior spreading is the destruction of the very essence of community and the breakdown of the moral order that has sustained people for generations. It is a path that leads to chaos, where the strong prey on the weak, and where the land, the ultimate provider, is neglected and abused.

Let this be a warning: the survival of our people and the balance of our land depend on the strength of our families, the protection of our children, and the upholding of our duties to one another. We must not allow the selfish desires of a few to undermine the sacred bonds that have kept us alive and thriving for centuries.

"The incident occurred on the night of July 13, 2025, when the girl reportedly insisted on staying with her father."

This sentence uses passive voice to describe the incident, which can downplay the mother's role and responsibility. It focuses on the girl's action of "insisting," which could imply that she was being difficult or disobedient, potentially creating a negative perception of the child. The use of "reportedly" also adds a layer of uncertainty, suggesting that the girl's insistence may not be entirely accurate. This phrasing could shift blame away from the mother and her partner, making their actions seem less intentional. By emphasizing the girl's behavior, it distracts from the severity of the crime and the mother's alleged involvement.

The text evokes a range of emotions, primarily negative and intense, which serve to create a sense of outrage and sympathy while guiding the reader's reaction.

Anger is a prominent emotion, stemming from the description of the mother's alleged actions. The text highlights the brutality of the murder, with the child being beaten and strangled, evoking a strong sense of anger towards the perpetrators. This anger is further intensified by the mother's subsequent behavior, going out to party as if nothing had happened, which adds an element of callousness and indifference. The anger is meant to provoke a strong reaction from the reader, encouraging a sense of moral indignation and a desire for justice.

Sadness and sympathy are also evoked, particularly when considering the victim, a seven-year-old girl who reportedly wanted to stay with her father. The text emphasizes her innocence and vulnerability, which is contrasted with the harsh reality of her death. This contrast between her wishes and her tragic fate is designed to evoke a deep sense of sadness and empathy from the reader.

Fear is another emotion that surfaces, especially when considering the potential consequences of such a heinous act. The text hints at the mother's motive, which involves framing her husband for the crime and gaining control over property. This suggests a level of premeditation and a potential threat to others, especially family members, which can induce a sense of fear and concern for the safety of those involved.

The writer employs several persuasive techniques to enhance the emotional impact. One notable technique is the use of vivid and graphic language to describe the murder, such as "beating" and "strangling," which paints a stark picture and arouses strong emotions. The repetition of certain phrases, like "going out to party," emphasizes the callous nature of the perpetrators' actions and reinforces the anger and disgust felt by the reader.

Additionally, the inclusion of personal details, such as the mother's frequent engagement in nightlife activities despite objections, adds a layer of familiarity and relatability. This personal touch can make the story more impactful and compelling, as it connects the reader to the characters and their actions.

By skillfully weaving these emotions and persuasive techniques throughout the text, the writer effectively guides the reader's reaction, evoking a strong sense of outrage, sympathy, and concern, while also aiming to influence their opinion and potentially inspire action, such as supporting stricter laws or increased awareness about child safety.