A 27-year-old man named Antony Mathew, originally from Kerala, was arrested by the Koramangala police in Bengaluru for allegedly selling drugs. The police reportedly found 1.08 grams of hydro ganja valued at ₹1 crore (approximately $120,000) in his possession. After completing his postgraduate studies in English literature, Mathew began blogging but also turned to drug peddling as a means of income. He was apprehended near NGV Gate while supposedly delivering drugs to customers that included students and IT professionals.

During questioning, Mathew confessed to sourcing the drugs from contacts back in Kerala and claimed he had been selling them in Bengaluru for several months. He has been charged under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, with investigations continuing to uncover his network.

In a separate incident, two individuals from Ghana were arrested by Yelahanka police after they were found with 700 grams of MDMA worth ₹70 lakh (around $84,000). The suspects had entered India on medical visas but allegedly overstayed their permits to engage in drug trafficking. They had rented a house where they operated their activities throughout the city. The landlord is also facing charges for renting out property to foreigners without following proper procedures.

Original article

This article does not provide any immediate actionable information for readers. It does not offer steps or instructions on how to identify, report, or avoid drug-related activities. There are no resources or tools mentioned that could assist readers in taking action.

In terms of educational depth, the article provides some basic facts about two drug-related arrests and the charges involved. However, it does not delve deeper into the causes or systems that contribute to drug trafficking. It fails to educate readers on the broader context, such as the supply chain, the impact on communities, or the potential long-term effects of drug abuse.

The personal relevance of this article is limited. While drug-related crimes can have an impact on society, the specific incidents mentioned do not directly affect the reader's daily life or personal choices. It does not provide information on how to recognize drug-related activities or how to protect oneself or one's community from such crimes.

The article does not serve a public service function in a meaningful way. It reports on arrests and charges, which is a form of public information, but it does not provide any new insights, warnings, or advice that could assist the public in staying safe or understanding the issue better.

The advice or steps implied in the article, such as reporting suspicious activities or following legal procedures, are not clearly outlined. The article does not provide practical guidance on how to identify drug trafficking or how to navigate the legal system if one encounters such activities. Thus, the practicality of the advice is limited.

In terms of long-term impact, the article does not offer any strategies or ideas that could lead to lasting positive change. It does not discuss prevention, rehabilitation, or community-based solutions that could address the root causes of drug trafficking and abuse.

The emotional or psychological impact of the article is negative. It may create a sense of fear or concern about drug-related crimes but does not provide any coping mechanisms or strategies to deal with such issues. It leaves readers with a sense of helplessness rather than empowering them with knowledge or tools to address the problem.

Finally, the article uses dramatic language and sensationalizes the incidents to grab attention. It focuses on the value of the drugs involved and the nationalities of the suspects, which may appeal to readers' curiosity but does not contribute to a meaningful understanding of the issue. The article is more focused on generating interest and clicks than providing substantive information or helping readers.

The actions described in this text reveal a profound betrayal of the moral bonds that sustain families and communities. The individuals involved, driven by personal gain, have abandoned their duty to protect and nurture the vulnerable, especially the young and the wise elders.

Drug peddling, as demonstrated by Antony Mathew, is a direct assault on the foundation of society. It corrupts the youth, the future leaders and guardians of the community, by exposing them to substances that cloud their judgment and weaken their resolve. The very students and IT professionals who should be building their lives and contributing to the community's prosperity are instead being led astray, their potential squandered.

The two individuals from Ghana, who overstayed their visas and engaged in drug trafficking, further illustrate the disregard for the sacred trust between guests and hosts. They abused the hospitality extended to them, tainting the reputation of their community and endangering the lives of those around them. Their actions not only threaten the safety of the community but also invite consequences that could disrupt the peaceful coexistence between different groups.

The landlord, by renting to foreigners without due diligence, has also failed in his responsibility to the community. He has potentially exposed his neighbors to danger and disrupted the harmony of the local area.

These actions, if left unchecked and unchallenged, will erode the very fabric of society. They will lead to a breakdown of trust, where neighbors no longer look out for each other, and where the young and old are left vulnerable to exploitation and harm. The land, a sacred gift to be tended and protected, will be neglected as the focus shifts to personal gain and selfish pursuits.

The consequence of such behavior spreading is a community torn apart, where families are fractured, children are lost to addiction, and the land is neglected. The balance of life, so carefully maintained by generations past, will be disrupted, and the future of the community will be in jeopardy.

It is the duty of the present generation to uphold the moral order, to protect the young, respect the elders, and tend to the land. Failure to do so will result in a society that is weak, divided, and ultimately unable to survive and thrive.

"He was apprehended near NGV Gate while supposedly delivering drugs to customers that included students and IT professionals."

This sentence uses the word "supposedly" to suggest that the man's actions are not certain or proven. It creates doubt and implies that the man might not have been doing what he is accused of. This is a form of gaslighting, as it questions the validity of the evidence and the police's actions. By using "supposedly," the sentence downplays the seriousness of the crime and may lead readers to question the man's guilt.

The text primarily evokes a sense of concern and unease as it details the arrests of individuals involved in drug-related crimes. The emotion of worry is evident throughout, especially when considering the potential impact of drug trafficking on society, particularly among students and IT professionals. This concern is heightened by the revelation that the suspects in the second incident overstayed their visas and operated their activities from a rented house, indicating a more organized and sustained criminal enterprise.

The text also conveys a sense of anger and frustration towards the individuals involved in drug peddling, as their actions are portrayed as detrimental to society. The use of words like "allegedly" and "supposedly" adds a layer of uncertainty and intrigue, which can heighten the reader's emotional response, making them more invested in the story.

To guide the reader's reaction, the text employs a strategic use of language to create a sense of urgency and seriousness. For instance, the precise details of the drug quantities and their estimated values in both Indian rupees and US dollars emphasize the scale and seriousness of the crimes. This precision and specificity add a layer of credibility to the story, making the reader more likely to believe and engage with the information presented.

The writer's choice of words and the narrative structure also contribute to the emotional impact. By focusing on the personal stories of the individuals involved, such as Antony Mathew's background in literature and blogging, the text humanizes the criminals, making their actions more relatable and thus more shocking. This personal narrative approach can evoke a stronger emotional response from the reader, as it brings the issue closer to home.

Additionally, the text employs a technique of repetition, emphasizing the involvement of students and IT professionals as customers, which serves to highlight the potential reach and impact of drug trafficking. This repetition not only reinforces the seriousness of the issue but also creates a sense of familiarity, making the reader more likely to connect with and remember the story.

In summary, the text skillfully employs emotional language and narrative techniques to guide the reader's reaction, evoking feelings of concern, anger, and frustration towards drug-related crimes. By personalizing the story and emphasizing the potential societal impact, the writer effectively persuades the reader to take a serious view of these crimes and their consequences.