A controversy has arisen in Kerala regarding a feet-washing ritual performed by students during Guru Purnima celebrations. Videos showing this practice in some CBSE schools have gone viral, prompting criticism from the state's Education Minister, V Sivankutty. He expressed concerns about the appropriateness of such rituals in educational settings, questioning where it is stated in Indian culture that students should wash teachers' feet or those of political leaders.

In response to the backlash, Kerala's Governor Rajendra Arlekar defended the ritual as part of 'guru puja,' emphasizing its cultural significance. He argued that forgetting one's culture leads to losing one's identity and questioned why there was opposition to this traditional practice.

The Education Minister rejected the Governor's defense, stating that using children for such rituals is not aligned with Kerala's values. The state government has requested explanations from the schools involved regarding how and why these rituals were conducted.

Original article (kerala)

This article is like a big discussion between some important people in Kerala about a special tradition, where students wash their teachers' feet. It doesn't really tell you what to do or give you any special steps to follow, so it's not very helpful for doing something. It also doesn't teach you a lot of new things or explain why this tradition is important in a way that makes sense. The article is more about what these people think and argue about, which might be interesting, but it doesn't help you with your own life or give you any cool ideas to try out. It's like a story about a problem, but it doesn't give you the tools to solve it or even understand it better. It's not very useful for learning or doing something new.

The text shows cultural bias. The Governor, Rajendra Arlekar, defends the feet-washing ritual as a cultural practice, saying, "forgetting one's culture leads to losing one's identity." This statement favors a certain cultural tradition and implies that rejecting it is a threat to one's identity. It also suggests that cultural practices should be accepted without question. This bias is seen in how the Governor frames the ritual as an essential part of culture, ignoring potential concerns or criticisms.

The text presents a complex interplay of emotions stemming from a cultural controversy in Kerala. At its core, the issue evokes a sense of concern and unease, particularly among the state's Education Minister, V Sivankutty. His criticism of the feet-washing ritual is driven by a strong sense of discomfort and a belief that such practices are inappropriate in educational settings. This emotion serves to highlight the minister's commitment to maintaining a certain standard of behavior and respect within schools.

In contrast, Kerala's Governor, Rajendra Arlekar, expresses a different emotion—one of cultural pride and a sense of duty to uphold tradition. His defense of the ritual as part of 'guru puja' is an emotional appeal to the importance of cultural heritage. By questioning why there is opposition, the governor aims to evoke a sense of shared identity and a need to protect cultural practices.

The Education Minister's rejection of the governor's defense is an emotional response, too, driven by a sense of moral obligation and a belief in the values of Kerala. His statement that using children for such rituals is not aligned with Kerala's values is an emotional appeal to the state's collective conscience.

These emotions guide the reader's reaction by presenting a clear conflict between two powerful figures in Kerala's government. The minister's concern and the governor's cultural pride create a tension that invites the reader to take sides or, at the very least, to consider the merits of each argument.

The writer uses emotional language to persuade by employing strong, descriptive words like 'criticism,' 'concerns,' and 'opposition.' These words paint a picture of a heated debate, evoking a sense of urgency and importance. The use of phrases like 'forgetting one's culture' and 'losing one's identity' are emotionally charged, appealing to the reader's sense of self and cultural identity.

By comparing the ritual to a traditional practice, the governor employs a persuasive technique that aims to normalize the feet-washing ritual, making it seem more acceptable and less controversial. The minister, on the other hand, uses the emotional appeal of protecting children and upholding values to gain support for his position.

Overall, the emotional language and persuasive techniques used in the text aim to shape the reader's opinion, either in support of cultural preservation or in favor of modern values and educational standards.