In Khejuri, West Bengal, a 12-hour bandh called by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) led to clashes between protesters and police on July 14, 2025. The protest was organized in response to the deaths of two individuals, Sujit Das and Sudhir Chandra Paik, who died under disputed circumstances while attending a Muharram event. The BJP alleged that they were murdered by members of the local Trinamool Congress party, while police reported that the deaths were accidental due to falling halogen lamps.

During the bandh, BJP supporters blocked highways using tree trunks for several hours. Police intervened to remove these blockades and arrested eight individuals for causing traffic disruptions. The protest resulted in vandalism of some vehicles and significant inconvenience for commuters as public transport largely ceased operations and many shops remained closed.

Despite the unrest, an examination at a local college proceeded after initial attempts to halt it failed. A large police presence was deployed to manage the situation. Suvendu Adhikari, Leader of Opposition in West Bengal's Assembly, led a march demanding justice for the deceased and called for murder charges against those he claimed were responsible. Some BJP workers expressed concerns about police harassment towards locals during this time of tension.

Original article (khejuri) (bandh)

This article doesn't give you a clear plan or steps to take, so it's not very helpful for doing something right away. It's more like a story about something that happened, with lots of details. It tells you about a protest and some fights between people and the police, but it doesn't teach you something really important or new. It might be interesting to know, but it's not like a lesson or a guide. The story is about something that happened far away, so it might not change your life or how you live. It doesn't give you any special tools or ways to help yourself or others. It's more like a report, and it doesn't really help you do anything different or better. It's not trying to trick you or make you click on ads, but it's not very useful for making big changes or learning something super important.

"The protest was organized in response to the deaths of two individuals, Sujit Das and Sudhir Chandra Paik, who died under disputed circumstances while attending a Muharram event."

This sentence shows a bias towards the BJP's narrative. It presents the protest as a response to the deaths, implying a direct connection, without providing evidence or context. The use of "disputed circumstances" suggests a one-sided view, favoring the BJP's allegation of murder. This phrasing creates a false belief that the protest is justified, ignoring other possible factors.

The text conveys a range of emotions, primarily driven by the tense and violent circumstances surrounding the protest and the deaths of Sujit Das and Sudhir Chandra Paik.

Anger is a dominant emotion, expressed by the BJP supporters who organized the protest. Their anger is directed at the alleged murderers, whom they believe to be members of the Trinamool Congress party. This anger fuels their actions, as they block highways and cause disruptions, showcasing their determination to seek justice. The strength of this emotion is evident in the intensity of the protest, which resulted in arrests and vandalism.

Fear is another emotion that permeates the text. The protesters fear that justice will not be served, and this fear drives their actions. They are afraid of the consequences of the alleged murder and the potential impunity of the perpetrators. This fear is also present in the concerns expressed by BJP workers about police harassment, suggesting a broader sense of unease and vulnerability.

Sadness is implicit in the text, particularly in the mention of the deaths of Das and Paik. The circumstances of their deaths, whether accidental or not, have caused grief and sorrow for their families and the community. This emotion, though not explicitly stated, underpins the entire narrative, providing a somber backdrop to the events.

The emotions in the text serve to create a sense of urgency and sympathy. By highlighting the anger, fear, and sadness, the writer aims to evoke an emotional response from the reader, encouraging them to understand the protesters' motivations and the gravity of the situation. The text builds trust by presenting a detailed account of the events, allowing the reader to form their own opinions based on the facts presented.

To persuade the reader, the writer employs several rhetorical devices. One notable technique is the use of vivid language to describe the protest and its aftermath. Words like "clashes," "blockades," and "vandalism" paint a picture of chaos and disorder, emphasizing the intensity of the situation. By repeating words like "protest" and "justice," the writer reinforces the central themes, ensuring they remain at the forefront of the reader's mind.

Additionally, the writer personalizes the story by mentioning specific individuals, such as Suvendu Adhikari, the Leader of Opposition, who led the march. This adds a human element to the narrative, making it more relatable and engaging. By presenting a balanced account that includes the perspectives of various stakeholders, the writer aims to maintain objectivity while still evoking an emotional response.