In Hong Kong, there has been a growing concern about cases where parents harm their children. Reports indicate that at least three such incidents occurred each year from 2020 to 2024. These tragic events have involved various victims, including newborns and adult children with disabilities.

Experts in health and social work are urging the government to create a registry that would track these cases. They believe that documenting details such as the victims' personal information and the marital status of the parents could help identify patterns in these tragedies. This information could be crucial for authorities to develop strategies aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Recent incidents include a mother accused of suffocating her three children and a father who threw his son from a rooftop before jumping himself. These shocking events highlight the urgent need for effective measures to protect children and address the underlying issues leading to such violence within families.

Original article

This article is like a big puzzle piece that doesn't quite fit. It tells us about sad things happening to kids in Hong Kong, but it doesn't give us any super helpful or easy-to-follow steps to make things better. It's like the grown-ups who wrote it are asking for help but not really showing us how we can help. It doesn't teach us anything new or exciting, and it might make us feel a bit worried, but it doesn't give us any cool ideas or plans to fix the problem. It's more like a story that makes us think, but it doesn't have a happy ending or a fun adventure we can go on. It's not like a magic spell that makes things better; it just tells us about bad stuff and asks for help without giving us the tools to be heroes.

The rising cases of family violence, particularly those involving harm to children, in Hong Kong are a stark reminder of the erosion of the fundamental bonds that protect the most vulnerable members of our communities. The fact that such incidents have occurred with alarming regularity, involving both newborns and adult children with disabilities, underscores a profound failure in the fulfillment of parental duties and the breakdown of family cohesion.

The proposal to create a registry to track these cases, while potentially useful for identifying patterns, does not address the root causes of this violence. It shifts the responsibility from families and communities to a distant authority, potentially weakening the natural duties of fathers, mothers, and extended kin to protect and care for their children. This approach may inadvertently impose forced economic or social dependencies that further fracture family cohesion.

Moreover, such measures may not adequately prioritize the protection of children and the preservation of family integrity. The focus on documenting personal information and marital status may overlook critical factors such as community support structures, economic pressures, and access to resources that could help prevent these tragedies.

The consequences of unchecked family violence are dire: it undermines trust within families and communities, jeopardizes the well-being and survival of children, and erodes the foundations upon which healthy societies are built. If left unaddressed, these trends will have long-term consequences on community trust, land stewardship, and ultimately, the continuity of generations.

To effectively combat this issue, it is essential to emphasize personal responsibility and local accountability within families and communities. This includes recognizing the importance of traditional kinship bonds in protecting children and supporting parents in their duties. Communities must come together to provide support structures for families under stress, ensuring that no parent feels isolated or without recourse when facing difficulties.

Furthermore, any solutions must prioritize maintaining sex-based protections that are essential for safeguarding modesty and protecting vulnerable members within families. This includes ensuring that any interventions respect biological boundaries critical for family protection.

In conclusion, if these incidents of family violence continue unchecked without a concerted effort from families and communities to reclaim their responsibilities in protecting their most vulnerable members, we risk witnessing a further disintegration of family cohesion and an increase in harm towards children. The real consequence will be a society where life is devalued at its most vulnerable stages—childhood—and where community trust is irreparably damaged. It is imperative that we return to upholding clear personal duties within clans as our first line of defense against such tragedies. Only through renewed commitment to ancestral principles can we ensure the survival and well-being of future generations.

"These tragic events have involved various victims, including newborns and adult children with disabilities."

This sentence uses strong words like "tragic" and "victims" to evoke emotions and emphasize the seriousness of the incidents. By describing the victims as "newborns" and "adult children with disabilities," it highlights their vulnerability and innocence, which can manipulate readers' feelings and make them more sympathetic towards the affected individuals.

The text evokes a range of emotions, primarily centered around sadness, anger, and fear. These emotions are expressed through the use of powerful language and vivid descriptions of tragic incidents.

Sadness is a prevalent emotion throughout the text. It is evident in the description of the victims, including newborns and adult children with disabilities, who have suffered harm at the hands of their parents. The word "tragic" is used to describe these events, emphasizing the profound sorrow associated with such incidents. This emotion serves to create a sense of empathy and compassion for the victims, encouraging readers to feel a deep connection to their suffering.

Anger is another strong emotion that surfaces, particularly when discussing the actions of the parents involved. Words like "accused," "suffocating," and "throwing" paint a picture of violent and callous behavior, evoking a sense of outrage and indignation. This emotion is intended to provoke a strong reaction, urging readers to demand action and accountability.

Fear is also a significant emotion, especially when considering the potential for future occurrences. The text highlights the urgency of the situation, stating that these incidents have been occurring annually, and the experts' call for a registry suggests a growing concern for the safety of children. This emotion is designed to create a sense of alarm, motivating readers to support measures that address the issue and protect vulnerable individuals.

The writer employs emotional language to persuade readers of the gravity of the situation. By using words like "shocking," "urgent," and "tragic," they emphasize the severity of the incidents and the need for immediate action. The repetition of the word "such" before describing the violence within families serves to intensify the emotional impact, drawing attention to the extreme nature of these events.

Additionally, the personal stories of the victims, such as the mother accused of suffocating her children and the father who threw his son from a rooftop, are powerful tools to evoke emotion. These narratives create a sense of intimacy and connection, allowing readers to imagine themselves in similar situations and feel the weight of the tragedy.

By skillfully weaving these emotions into the text, the writer aims to guide readers' reactions, fostering a sense of compassion, urgency, and a desire for change. The emotional language and persuasive techniques employed serve to rally support for the proposed registry, highlighting its potential to identify patterns and prevent future harm.