In Mysuru, the MLA for Krishnaraja, T.S. Srivatsa, raised concerns about the illegal collection of parking fees from visitors at the foot of Chamundi Hills. He reported that individuals were stopping vehicles and demanding a ₹10 (approximately $0.12) fee for parking, claiming they had a tender to do so. However, when Mr. Srivatsa contacted local officials, including the Tahsildar and the Panchayat Development Officer, both denied granting any permission for such collections.

Following this revelation, he alerted police officials to investigate the matter and take action against those involved in what he described as an illegal operation. Mr. Srivatsa highlighted that many people visit Chamundi Hills during weekends and festivals like Ashada Fridays, making it an opportunity for unscrupulous individuals to exploit visitors financially.

He also expressed concern over how this activity could occur without police knowledge since collectors were positioned near police barricades. The MLA has called for immediate legal action against those responsible for collecting these unauthorized fees.

Original article (mysuru) (tahsildar)

This article is like a puzzle piece that doesn't quite fit. It tells us about a problem, which is good, but it doesn't give us all the answers we need. It's like a story without the ending. The article talks about how some people are asking for money from visitors at a popular place, but it doesn't tell us what we, as readers, can do about it. It doesn't give us any superpowers or tools to fight this problem. It also doesn't teach us something new or important that we can use in our daily lives. It's like a secret that only the grown-ups know, and they're not sharing it with us. It might be important for some people, but it doesn't help us directly. It's not like a map that shows us a hidden treasure or a recipe that makes a yummy treat. It's more like a picture without colors, leaving us wondering what to do next.

The text shows a political bias towards the MLA, T.S. Srivatsa, and his concerns. It presents his perspective without providing an equal platform for the alleged collectors or other stakeholders.

"He reported that individuals were stopping vehicles and demanding a ₹10 (approximately $0.12) fee for parking, claiming they had a tender to do so."

This sentence implies that the MLA's report is the only valid source of information, leaving out any potential counterarguments or explanations from the collectors.

The text primarily conveys a sense of anger and concern, which are the dominant emotions expressed by Mr. Srivatsa, the MLA for Krishnaraja. These emotions are evident throughout the passage and are directed towards the illegal collection of parking fees and the exploitation of visitors at Chamundi Hills.

Mr. Srivatsa's anger is palpable as he describes the unscrupulous actions of individuals demanding fees without proper authorization. The use of words like "illegal," "unauthorized," and "exploit" highlights his frustration and indignation towards this unfair practice. His concern is also evident as he emphasizes the potential financial burden on visitors, especially during peak times like weekends and festivals.

These emotions serve to create a sense of urgency and sympathy. By expressing his anger and concern, Mr. Srivatsa aims to evoke a similar response from his audience, encouraging them to share his outrage and take action against this illegal operation. The description of the collectors' proximity to police barricades adds to the sense of worry, suggesting a potential lack of law enforcement awareness or action, which further fuels the MLA's anger and concern.

The writer effectively employs emotional language to persuade the reader. The use of strong, emotive words like "illegal," "unscrupulous," and "exploit" paints a vivid picture of the situation, evoking a strong emotional response. By repeatedly emphasizing the financial burden on visitors and the potential for exploitation, the writer creates a sense of injustice and a need for immediate action. This persuasive technique is further enhanced by Mr. Srivatsa's personal involvement and his direct call for legal action, which adds a sense of urgency and credibility to his message.

Overall, the emotional tone of the text guides the reader's reaction, encouraging them to share the MLA's anger and concern, and ultimately, to support his call for legal action against those responsible for the unauthorized fee collection.