An Assam man named Pratim Bora was arrested for circulating altered images of his ex-girlfriend, which were created using advanced artificial intelligence tools. These images superimposed her face onto explicit content, falsely suggesting she was involved in the adult film industry and claiming she lived in the United States. The police confirmed that the images were entirely fabricated and intended to harm the woman's reputation following their breakup.

The investigation began after the victim, identified as Ms. Phukan, filed a complaint with the cybercrime unit. Bora admitted during questioning to using platforms like Midjourney AI, Desire AI, and OpenArt AI to create these morphed images. He also set up fake email accounts and social media profiles to distribute this harmful material.

Authorities are currently verifying all digital identities associated with Bora. The case has been registered under various sections of Indian law related to cyber harassment, defamation, obscenity, and invasion of privacy. Bora remains in police custody while further interrogation and evidence collection are conducted. A police official emphasized that anyone sharing or commenting on this defamatory content could face legal consequences and urged the public to be sensitive to the emotional distress experienced by the victim.

Original article (assam) (defamation) (obscenity)

This article is like a big warning sign to help people stay safe online. It tells a story about a man who did something really mean and hurtful to his ex-girlfriend by using special AI tools to make fake pictures of her. These pictures were not true, but they made it look like she was doing bad things, and he shared them to hurt her. The police caught him and are now checking all his online stuff to make sure he doesn't do it again. This story is important because it teaches us that we should be careful about what we see online and not believe everything. It also shows us that doing mean things online can get you in trouble with the police. So, it gives us a lesson to be kind and not spread fake stuff, and it helps us learn about how to stay safe and not get hurt by bad people online.

The text shows a clear sex-based bias. It only mentions the man, Pratim Bora, as the perpetrator and the woman, Ms. Phukan, as the victim. This highlights the man's actions and downplays the woman's experience. The focus is on Bora's arrest and his use of AI tools, while Ms. Phukan's emotional distress and the impact of the defamation are given less attention. This bias puts more importance on the man's story and could make readers forget the woman's suffering.

The text evokes a range of emotions, primarily centered around anger, distress, and a sense of violation. These emotions are expressed through the actions and experiences of the victim, Ms. Phukan, and the subsequent response from authorities.

The anger is evident in the victim's decision to file a complaint with the cybercrime unit. This action demonstrates her determination to seek justice and hold her ex-boyfriend accountable for his malicious actions. The anger is further emphasized by the police's confirmation that the images were fabricated with the intent to harm her reputation. This intentional and harmful behavior evokes a strong sense of anger and indignation, not only for the victim but also for the readers who learn about this injustice.

Distress and emotional pain are implied throughout the text. The victim's experience of having her face superimposed on explicit content and the false suggestion of her involvement in the adult film industry is inherently distressing. This invasion of privacy and the potential damage to her reputation are likely to cause significant emotional turmoil. The police official's emphasis on the victim's emotional distress further highlights this aspect, urging the public to be sensitive to her suffering.

The text also conveys a sense of violation and invasion of privacy. The act of creating and distributing morphed images without consent is a clear violation of the victim's rights and personal boundaries. This emotional response is intended to evoke a sense of outrage and empathy from readers, encouraging them to recognize the seriousness of such cybercrimes and the need for legal consequences.

To persuade readers, the writer employs several emotional strategies. Firstly, by focusing on the victim's experience and her actions, the writer personalizes the story, making it more relatable and engaging. This narrative approach helps readers connect with the victim's emotions and understand the impact of such crimes on an individual level.

The writer also uses strong language to describe the actions of the perpetrator, such as "circulating altered images," "superimposed her face," and "intended to harm." These words carry a sense of intentionality and malice, evoking a stronger emotional response and emphasizing the seriousness of the crime.

Additionally, the writer repeats the idea of the victim's emotional distress, emphasizing it through the police official's statement. This repetition serves to reinforce the emotional impact and guide readers' attention towards the human cost of such cybercrimes. By doing so, the writer aims to create a sense of empathy and a desire for justice among readers, potentially inspiring them to support or advocate for stricter measures against cyber harassment and invasion of privacy.