A recent survey conducted as part of the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision of Bihar's voter lists revealed that numerous individuals from Nepal, Bangladesh, and Myanmar are living in Bihar with Indian identification documents. These documents include Aadhaar cards, domicile certificates, and ration cards, which were reportedly obtained through illegal means. Block Level Officers identified these individuals during a door-to-door survey.

The Election Commission plans to investigate these cases further between August 1 and August 30. If the allegations are confirmed, the names of these voters will be removed from the voter list. This situation has sparked significant debate in Bihar regarding the ongoing revision of voter rolls ahead of the Assembly elections.

The Special Intensive Revision was launched on June 24 to update voter lists by adding eligible citizens and removing those who do not qualify. The last revision took place in 2003. The Election Commission noted that factors like rapid urbanization, frequent migration, young citizens reaching voting age, unreported deaths, and the inclusion of foreign nationals made this revision necessary.

Political parties have raised concerns about the timing of this exercise. The Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and Congress have accused it of being a conspiracy to exclude legitimate voters from participating in upcoming elections. In response, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) questioned why there was opposition to verifying genuine voters while removing fraudulent ones.

This issue has escalated to legal challenges in the Supreme Court, where questions arose about whether sufficient time exists for completing this process before elections occur. The court expressed doubts about whether such a large-scale review could be completed without disenfranchising legitimate voters or allowing them enough time to appeal any exclusions before voting takes place.

Original article (bihar) (congress) (nepal) (bangladesh) (myanmar)

This article is like a big puzzle piece that doesn't quite fit. It tells us about a problem with some people in Bihar who have Indian documents but might not be allowed to vote. The story is a bit confusing because it doesn't give us clear steps to do something about it. It's like a teacher giving a lesson but not telling us what we can learn from it. The article doesn't teach us anything new or help us understand a bigger picture. It's more like a grown-ups' argument about voting rules. It might be important for some people in Bihar, but it doesn't really help us in our daily lives or tell us what to do. It's just a story about a problem, and it doesn't give us any tools to fix it or make it better. So, it's not very useful for us to read and doesn't really help us in any way.

The text shows political bias by favoring one party's perspective. It quotes the BJP's response, which questions the opposition's motives, making them seem suspicious. "In response, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) questioned why there was opposition to verifying genuine voters while removing fraudulent ones." This sentence implies that those opposing the revision are defending fraudulent voters.

The text evokes a range of emotions, primarily centered around concerns and suspicions regarding the integrity of the voter lists and the upcoming elections in Bihar.

Fear and anxiety are prominent emotions throughout the text. The fear stems from the potential consequences of illegal activities, such as the acquisition of Indian identification documents by foreign nationals. This fear is heightened by the possibility of legitimate voters being excluded from the electoral process due to the ongoing revision of voter rolls. The anxiety is further fueled by the legal challenges in the Supreme Court, where there are doubts about the feasibility of completing the revision process without disenfranchising eligible voters.

Anger and frustration are also evident, particularly from the political parties. The Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and Congress express anger and accuse the revision process of being a conspiracy to exclude legitimate voters. This anger is a reaction to the perceived threat of their supporters being disenfranchised. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), on the other hand, questions the opposition's stance, implying that verifying genuine voters should not be an issue. This creates a sense of frustration, as it highlights a divide in opinions and potentially sows seeds of doubt about the motives of the opposing parties.

The emotions in the text serve to create a sense of urgency and importance around the issue. By evoking fear and anxiety, the writer emphasizes the potential consequences of illegal activities and the need for a thorough revision of voter lists. The anger and frustration expressed by the political parties add a layer of controversy and highlight the high stakes involved in the upcoming elections.

To persuade the reader, the writer employs several rhetorical devices. One notable technique is the use of strong, emotive language to describe the situation. Words like "conspiracy," "illegal," and "disenfranchising" carry a heavy emotional weight and imply a sense of wrongdoing and injustice. By repeating these ideas and using such powerful language, the writer aims to evoke a strong emotional response from the reader, aligning them with the concerns and suspicions expressed in the text.

Additionally, the writer compares the current situation to the last revision of voter lists in 2003, implying that the lack of frequent updates has led to the inclusion of foreign nationals. This comparison serves to emphasize the urgency of the issue and the need for immediate action. By presenting a clear problem and potential consequences, the writer aims to persuade the reader that the revision process is necessary and should be supported.