On June 12, 2025, Air India Flight 171, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, tragically crashed shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad, India. The aircraft was en route to London Gatwick with 230 passengers and crew on board. Just moments after departure, both engines lost power when the fuel-control switches in the cockpit unexpectedly moved from "run" to "cutoff." This caused an immediate loss of altitude.

The preliminary investigation by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau revealed that both engines shut down within one second of each other. The plane crashed into nearby buildings in a densely populated area less than two kilometers from the runway. All but one person on board died; the sole survivor was Vishwaskumar Ramesh, a British national of Indian descent. Additionally, nineteen people on the ground were killed and sixty-seven others were injured.

The investigation found that the aircraft had been deemed airworthy prior to takeoff and had undergone routine maintenance. However, there was a previous advisory from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration regarding potential issues with fuel-control switches that had not been addressed by Air India since compliance was not mandatory.

Cockpit voice recordings indicated confusion among the pilots just before the crash when one pilot questioned why the fuel switches were cut off while claiming he did not do it himself. Despite attempts to regain control by returning the switches to "run" and deploying emergency systems like the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) and Auxiliary Power Unit (APU), only partial engine relight occurred before impact.

The timeline of events showed that within seconds of takeoff, as speed increased and lift-off occurred, both engines failed almost simultaneously leading to a desperate mayday call just moments before crashing.

As investigations continue with assistance from Boeing and international experts, no immediate actions have been deemed necessary for other Boeing 787-8 planes or their engines at this time.

Original article (ahmedabad)

This article is like a big puzzle piece that doesn't quite fit. It tells a sad story about a plane crash, but it doesn't give us any super helpful information that we can use right now. It doesn't teach us anything new or exciting, and it's not like we can do anything to stop a plane crash from happening. It's just a bunch of facts and details about what happened, and while it might be interesting to some people, it doesn't really help us in our daily lives. It doesn't tell us how to stay safe or what to do if something like this happens. It's more like a story that makes us feel sad and maybe a little scared, but it doesn't give us any super powers or special knowledge to make things better. So, it's kind of like a puzzle piece that's not quite right for the picture we're trying to build.

"The investigation found that the aircraft had been deemed airworthy prior to takeoff and had undergone routine maintenance."

This sentence uses passive voice to avoid directly stating who deemed the aircraft airworthy. It hides the responsibility of Air India and the potential negligence in not addressing the FAA advisory. By using passive construction, it creates a sense of detachment and downplays the role of the airline.

The text evokes a range of emotions, painting a tragic and harrowing picture of the Air India Flight 171 crash. The dominant emotions are sadness and grief, which are evident throughout the narrative. These emotions are strongest when describing the loss of lives, with a particular emphasis on the sole survivor, Vishwaskumar Ramesh, and the nineteen people killed on the ground. The text's detailed account of the crash, including the pilots' confusion and desperate attempts to regain control, adds to the overall sense of sadness and creates a poignant atmosphere.

The writer's intention is to evoke sympathy and empathy from the reader. By providing a detailed and personal account, such as mentioning the survivor's name and background, the reader is more likely to connect with the story on an emotional level. This strategy aims to humanize the tragedy, making it more relatable and impactful.

To enhance the emotional impact, the writer employs several persuasive techniques. One notable method is the use of vivid and descriptive language, such as "desperate mayday call" and "immediate loss of altitude," which create a sense of urgency and drama. The text also repeats certain phrases, like "both engines" and "fuel-control switches," to emphasize the simultaneous and unexpected nature of the engine failure, adding to the overall emotional intensity.

Additionally, the writer includes specific details, like the number of passengers and crew on board and the proximity of the crash site to the runway, to ground the tragedy in reality and make it more tangible for the reader. By combining these emotional and persuasive techniques, the text effectively guides the reader's reaction, ensuring they feel the weight of the tragedy and are compelled to consider the implications and potential actions that may arise from such an event.