The Indian government has made significant changes to its regulations regarding coal power plants, reversing a mandate that had been in place for over a decade. As of July 11, 2025, the government eased sulphur emission rules, exempting approximately 79% of coal power plants from the requirement to install flue-gas desulphurisation (FGD) systems. This exemption applies to plants located more than 10 kilometers from pollution hotspots.

For the remaining plants, a case-by-case review will be conducted for about 11%, while the last 10%, primarily situated near Delhi and other major cities, must comply with stricter standards by December 2027. The change follows an analysis by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), which noted concerns about increased carbon dioxide emissions linked to control measures.

Despite previous deadlines set in 2015 for sulphur dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants, compliance has been low; around 92% have yet to install necessary equipment. The new notification indicates that Category A plants within a critical radius must now meet standards extended from December 2024 to December 2027. Meanwhile, Category B plants will be evaluated individually rather than adhering to an earlier deadline of 2025.

Category C plants have been completely exempted from these norms if they meet certain stack height criteria by December 31, 2029. This decision comes after numerous requests for exemptions due to challenges such as limited technology availability and economic impacts stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic.

The ministry also indicated that thermal power units scheduled for retirement before December 31, 2030, would not need to comply with these standards if they provide an undertaking. However, penalties will apply if they continue operating beyond this date without meeting emission requirements.

Overall, these regulatory changes reflect ongoing discussions among various stakeholders and aim at balancing environmental concerns with economic realities faced by power producers in India.

Original article (delhi)

This article doesn't give you a clear plan or steps to take, so it's not very helpful for doing something right now. It's more like a story about some rules that the Indian government made about coal power plants. These rules are about pollution and how much bad stuff they can let out into the air. The article talks about different types of power plants and when they have to follow these rules, but it doesn't tell you what to do or how it will affect you directly. It's more for people who work in the government or with power plants, and it might be useful for them to know these things. But for most people, it's just a lot of information that doesn't really help them do anything or make a big change in their lives. It doesn't teach you something new in a fun way, and it might make you feel a bit confused or bored. So, while it has some important facts, it's not very useful for helping or guiding you in a way that makes your life better or easier.

"The Indian government has made significant changes to its regulations regarding coal power plants, reversing a mandate that had been in place for over a decade."

This sentence uses virtue signaling by highlighting the word "significant" to make the changes sound important and positive. It presents the government's actions as a bold move, potentially influencing readers to view the changes favorably.

The text primarily conveys a sense of concern and worry about the environmental impact of the Indian government's recent regulatory changes regarding coal power plants. This emotion is evident throughout the passage, especially when discussing the potential increase in carbon dioxide emissions and the low compliance rate with previous emission standards. The use of phrases like "concerns about increased carbon dioxide emissions" and "compliance has been low" highlights the underlying worry about the environmental consequences of these decisions.

The emotion of concern serves to draw attention to the potential negative outcomes of the policy changes and encourages readers to consider the long-term environmental implications. It creates a sense of urgency and prompts readers to reflect on the balance between economic interests and environmental sustainability. By expressing this emotion, the writer aims to raise awareness and potentially influence public opinion, urging readers to advocate for stricter environmental regulations.

To persuade readers, the writer employs a strategic choice of words and phrases. For instance, the use of "eased sulphur emission rules" and "exempting approximately 79% of coal power plants" emphasizes the relaxation of regulations, which could evoke a sense of unease among environmentally conscious readers. The mention of "challenges such as limited technology availability and economic impacts" further adds to the emotional appeal, as it suggests that the government is sympathetic to the difficulties faced by power producers.

Additionally, the writer employs a comparative strategy by highlighting the stricter standards for plants near Delhi and other major cities, which contrasts with the exemptions granted to other plants. This comparison may evoke a sense of injustice or concern among readers, especially those living in or near these urban areas. By using these persuasive techniques, the writer aims to steer readers' emotions and opinions, ultimately influencing their perception of the regulatory changes and potentially motivating them to take action or advocate for stricter environmental policies.