Chinese mathematician Hong Wang, a prominent figure in the field and a contender for the prestigious Fields Medal, faced backlash from nationalists in China due to her use of English during lectures. Despite her significant contributions to mathematics, including solving a long-standing problem known as the three-dimensional Kakeya conjecture, her overseas education and experience were criticized by some internet users who accused her of promoting U.S. interests.

Wang, who was born in Guilin and educated at Peking University before obtaining advanced degrees in France and the U.S., recently returned to China to give seminars at several universities. These events attracted large audiences but also drew negative attention because of her choice of language for the lectures.

Starting in September, she will take on a permanent position at the Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques near Paris. The Fields Medal winners will be announced next year, further highlighting Wang's rising profile within the global academic community.

Original article

This article doesn't give you any specific steps to take or actions to do. It's more like a story about a mathematician, Hong Wang, and some problems she faced. It teaches you a bit about her life and how she's really smart and solved a tricky math problem. But it doesn't tell you how to do something or help you with a problem you might have. It's not like a recipe or a guide that shows you how to do something useful. It's more like a story about someone else's life and their achievements. It might make you think about how people can be successful and how sometimes people might not like it when you do things differently, but it doesn't really help you with your own life or give you something you can do right now. It's more like a fun fact to know, but it doesn't change your daily life or make it better in a big way.

The backlash against Hong Wang for using English during her lectures in China highlights a concerning trend that may have unintended consequences on local communities and family bonds. The criticism, fueled by nationalist sentiments, may lead to a divisive atmosphere where individuals are pressured to conform to certain expectations, potentially undermining the trust and responsibility that are essential within kinship bonds.

The emphasis on nationality and language may create an environment where individuals feel forced to choose between their cultural heritage and their professional or academic pursuits. This could lead to a sense of disconnection from one's community and family, particularly for those who have pursued education or career opportunities abroad. The pressure to conform to nationalist expectations may also limit the ability of families to make choices about their children's education and future, potentially undermining the natural duties of parents to raise their children and care for their elders.

Moreover, the criticism of Wang's use of English may have a chilling effect on the exchange of ideas and knowledge within academic communities. This could ultimately harm the stewardship of the land, as the pursuit of scientific knowledge and innovation is crucial for addressing global challenges and ensuring the long-term survival of communities.

The fact that Wang is a prominent female mathematician who has made significant contributions to her field is also noteworthy. The backlash against her may perpetuate harmful stereotypes and discourage young women from pursuing careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). This could have long-term consequences for the continuity of communities, as it may limit the number of women who are able to contribute to the care and preservation of resources, ultimately affecting the survival of future generations.

In conclusion, if this trend of nationalist backlash against individuals who pursue international education or career opportunities continues unchecked, it may lead to a fragmentation of communities, erosion of trust and responsibility within kinship bonds, and ultimately harm the stewardship of the land. The emphasis on nationality and language may create an environment where individuals feel forced to choose between their cultural heritage and their professional or academic pursuits, potentially undermining the natural duties of parents to raise their children and care for their elders. It is essential to recognize the importance of preserving cultural heritage while also promoting international cooperation, exchange of ideas, and innovation, which are crucial for ensuring the long-term survival and prosperity of communities.

"Despite her significant contributions to mathematics, including solving a long-standing problem known as the three-dimensional Kakeya conjecture, her overseas education and experience were criticized by some internet users who accused her of promoting U.S. interests."

This sentence uses strong words like "significant contributions" and "long-standing problem" to highlight Wang's achievements, but then it shifts to a negative tone by saying "her overseas education and experience were criticized." The use of "some internet users" downplays the severity of the backlash, making it seem like a minor issue. This sentence also implies that Wang's work and education are not truly Chinese, which could be seen as a form of cultural bias. The focus on her overseas connections may suggest a bias towards nationalism and a belief that her work is less valuable because of her international ties.

The text conveys a range of emotions, primarily centered around the experiences of Chinese mathematician Hong Wang. These emotions include:

Pride: The text expresses pride in Wang's achievements, particularly her significant contributions to mathematics, such as solving the three-dimensional Kakeya conjecture. This emotion is evident throughout the passage, as it highlights Wang's talent and success in her field. The pride is strongest when discussing her problem-solving abilities, which are described as "significant" and "long-standing."

Anger and Disappointment: There is a sense of anger and disappointment directed towards the nationalists in China who criticized Wang for using English during her lectures. This emotion is implied through the description of the backlash she faced and the negative attention her seminars received. The anger is subtle but present, as the text hints at a frustration with the narrow-mindedness of those who criticized Wang's choice of language.

Excitement and Anticipation: The text also conveys excitement and anticipation for Wang's future endeavors. It mentions her upcoming permanent position at the Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques near Paris, which is a significant career move. Additionally, the announcement of the Fields Medal winners next year adds to the excitement, as it highlights Wang's rising profile and the potential recognition she may receive.

These emotions guide the reader's reaction by creating a narrative of a talented individual facing challenges and achieving success despite obstacles. The pride and excitement inspire admiration for Wang's accomplishments, while the anger and disappointment encourage the reader to question the critics' motives and perhaps even side with Wang.

The writer uses emotional language to persuade by employing descriptive phrases that highlight Wang's achievements and the unfair treatment she received. For instance, describing her contributions as "significant" and her problem-solving skills as related to a "long-standing" issue emphasizes her talent and the impact of her work. The use of the phrase "backlash from nationalists" implies a negative and unfair response, evoking sympathy for Wang.

Additionally, the writer employs a personal story-telling technique by providing details about Wang's background, such as her birthplace and educational journey. This adds a human element to the narrative, making Wang's experiences more relatable and engaging. By comparing her overseas education and experience to the criticism she faced, the writer emphasizes the contrast between Wang's global success and the narrow-minded perspective of her critics. This comparison serves to strengthen the emotional impact and guide the reader's opinion in Wang's favor.