The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC) announced that it will disqualify question setters who include politically controversial or communally sensitive questions in competitive exams. This decision was communicated by TNPSC Chairman S.K. Prabakar during a media briefing at Egmore Presidency Girls Higher Secondary School, prior to the Group IV examinations.

Prabakar emphasized that instructions had already been given to technical experts not to create such questions, but some have failed to comply. Consequently, those individuals will be removed from the panel of question setters. The Group IV exam is expected to select over 4,000 candidates for various government positions, with an increase in vacancies projected across departments.

The notification for the Group II and IIA exams is anticipated soon. In terms of recent recruitment statistics, 10,701 candidates were hired between January and December 2024, while 11,027 were recruited from January to June 2025. The Group IV exam saw participation from approximately 13.89 lakh candidates (1.39 million), with a notable majority being women.

Prabakar also mentioned improvements in the evaluation process for answer sheets under a new simplified system aimed at reducing errors in scoring. Results for the Group IV examination are expected within three months following its completion.

Original article

This article doesn't give you a lot of things you can do right away, like a plan or a step-by-step guide. It's more like a report about something that happened, which is the TNPSC's decision to stop question setters from asking tricky questions in exams. It teaches you a bit about how exams are made and how the TNPSC wants to make them fair. But it doesn't really tell you how to do something or give you a cool trick to use. It's more about a rule they made to help people. It might be important for people who are taking those exams, but for most people, it's just a story about a rule. It doesn't make your life better or worse, and it doesn't tell you how to do anything new. It's like a news story, but it doesn't have a happy ending or a sad ending, just a rule that might help some people.

No social critique analysis available for this item

"The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC) announced that it will disqualify question setters who include politically controversial or communally sensitive questions in competitive exams."

This sentence shows a bias towards protecting the interests of the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and maintaining a controlled exam environment. By focusing on disqualifying question setters, it shifts attention away from addressing the underlying issues of political and communal sensitivity. The use of words like "disqualify" and "controversial" creates a negative connotation, implying that question setters are at fault.

The text conveys a range of emotions, primarily centered around the theme of fairness and accountability in the competitive exam process.

One emotion that stands out is a sense of determination and assertiveness. This is evident in the TNPSC's decision to disqualify question setters who include politically sensitive content. The use of words like "disqualify" and "remove" indicates a strong stance against such practices, reflecting a commitment to maintaining the integrity of the exams. This emotion is further emphasized by the chairman's emphasis on the instructions already given to technical experts, suggesting a zero-tolerance approach.

Another emotion that appears is a sense of relief and satisfaction. The mention of improvements in the evaluation process, aimed at reducing errors in scoring, suggests that the TNPSC is taking steps to ensure a fair and accurate assessment of candidates. This is likely to be welcomed by both candidates and the public, as it addresses a common concern in competitive exams. The expectation of results within three months also indicates a more efficient and responsive system, which can be seen as a positive development.

The text also conveys a subtle emotion of anticipation and excitement, particularly regarding the upcoming Group II and IIA exams. The mention of increased vacancies and the large number of candidates participating in the Group IV exam creates a sense of opportunity and potential. This emotion is likely to be felt by candidates who are preparing for these exams, as well as by those who are interested in the recruitment process and its outcomes.

These emotions are strategically employed to guide the reader's reaction and build trust in the TNPSC's efforts. By expressing a strong determination to maintain exam integrity, the commission presents itself as an institution that values fairness and transparency. The mention of improvements in the evaluation process further enhances this image, suggesting a proactive and responsive approach to potential issues.

The text also uses emotional language to persuade and emphasize certain points. For instance, the use of the phrase "politically controversial or communally sensitive questions" carries a strong emotional weight, evoking a sense of potential harm and the need for caution. By repeating this phrase and emphasizing the potential consequences, the text creates a sense of urgency and importance around this issue.

Additionally, the mention of the large number of candidates participating in the Group IV exam, described as "approximately 13.89 lakh candidates (1.39 million)", is a powerful statistic that underscores the scale and significance of the exam process. This comparison to a large number helps to emphasize the importance of maintaining fairness and integrity.

In summary, the text employs a range of emotions to guide the reader's reaction, building trust and emphasizing the importance of fair practices in competitive exams. The strategic use of emotional language and persuasive techniques helps to convey the TNPSC's commitment to integrity and its proactive approach to potential issues.