The United Democratic Front (UDF) council party of the Kozhikode Corporation has called for a thorough investigation into the financial management of Haritha Karma Sena (HKS). Council party leaders K.C. Shobhita and K. Moideen Koya expressed concerns that a health inspector, who had been transferred previously, continues to exert control over HKS operations. They alleged that several health inspectors and executive committees overseeing three HKS consortiums are acting in an autocratic manner.

Shobhita emphasized that the democratic rights of HKS members are being undermined, with reports of threats against those who raise questions about the management. Additionally, it was noted that an accountant is operating without a formal appointment and that a core committee lacking HKS representatives is managing the bank account associated with HKS.

Original article

This article doesn't give you any steps to take or a plan to follow, so it's not very helpful for doing something. It's more like a story about a problem with a group called the Haritha Karma Sena (HKS). The story talks about how some people are worried that the HKS is being managed badly and that some of its members are being treated unfairly. It mentions things like an inspector and an accountant, but it doesn't tell you what to do about it. It's like a report, but it doesn't teach you anything new or give you ideas to make things better. It might be important for the people involved, but for most readers, it's just a story about a problem that doesn't affect them directly. It doesn't really help you in your daily life or give you any useful advice. It's not trying to trick you or make you click on ads, but it also doesn't offer any solutions or make you feel better about anything. So, while it might be interesting to some people, it's not very useful or helpful for most readers.

The text shows political bias favoring the UDF council party. It presents their concerns and allegations without providing an opposing viewpoint or evidence to challenge their claims. This one-sided narrative benefits the UDF by allowing their perspective to dominate without scrutiny. The text also uses strong words like "autocratic" and "undermined" to describe the actions of health inspectors, which creates a negative perception of their management style.

The text conveys a range of emotions, primarily centered around concerns and discontent. The council party leaders, K.C. Shobhita and K. Moideen Koya, express their worries and suspicions regarding the management of Haritha Karma Sena (HKS). Their language reflects a sense of unease and distrust towards the health inspectors and executive committees, suggesting a lack of transparency and democratic process.

The emotion of anger is evident in their allegations of autocratic behavior and the undermining of democratic rights. Shobhita's emphasis on threats against members who question management practices further intensifies this anger, indicating a deep-rooted issue within the organization. The strength of this emotion is moderate to high, as it is not an outburst but a sustained concern expressed through formal channels.

The purpose of conveying these emotions is to create awareness and build a case for an investigation. By expressing their worries and providing specific examples, the council party leaders aim to gain support and initiate action. The text serves as a call to address the alleged mismanagement and restore democratic principles within HKS.

The writer uses emotional language to persuade by employing strong, descriptive words like "undermined," "autocratic," and "threats." These words paint a picture of an organization in turmoil, where members' rights are being violated and an atmosphere of fear prevails. By repeating the concerns about democratic rights and the lack of formal appointments, the writer emphasizes the seriousness of the situation and creates a sense of urgency.

The comparison between the current state of HKS and the ideal democratic principles further highlights the disparity and evokes emotions of disappointment and a desire for change. The writer's choice of words and the repetition of key issues steer the reader's attention towards the alleged injustices and the need for intervention. This emotional appeal is a powerful tool to engage readers and encourage them to support the call for an investigation.