Kerala University is currently facing a significant administrative crisis as Vice-Chancellor Mohanan Kunnummal has rejected files submitted by Registrar K.S. Anil Kumar. On one occasion, the Vice-Chancellor returned three unsigned files from the Registrar while approving nearly 25 files from Mini Dejo Kappen, who has been temporarily handling the Registrar's duties. However, Kappen has since requested to step back from this role, and the Vice-Chancellor has not yet responded.

The situation escalated when the Vice-Chancellor informed the Governor that Dr. Kumar's return to campus was unauthorized and against clear directives. He instructed university officials not to process any documents signed by Dr. Kumar, emphasizing that any actions taken outside official instructions would not be tolerated.

Despite these orders, Dr. Kumar continued to report for work and occupied his office as usual. When asked about the ongoing file issues, he suggested waiting for developments without elaborating further. The university's security team indicated they were unable to enforce the order barring him from campus.

Members of the Syndicate, particularly those aligned with leftist groups, have called for an urgent meeting with the Vice-Chancellor to address this ongoing deadlock and expressed concern over repeated violations of statutory procedures by him. They highlighted that Dr. Kumar still holds access credentials for important digital systems within the university.

In a related action, members associated with BJP have approached Kerala High Court regarding this administrative turmoil at the university. Amidst these tensions, students affiliated with the Students’ Federation of India (SFI) protested on campus against what they perceive as politicization of university governance by Dr. Kunnummal and urged both state authorities and the Governor to intervene in resolving this crisis affecting students' education and welfare.

Original article (governor)

This article doesn't give you any specific things to do or steps to follow, so it's not very helpful for taking action. It's more like a story about a problem at a university, telling you about some fights between important people there. It doesn't teach you anything new or important that you can use in your own life. It's not really about helping people or giving them useful information. It's more like a big, complicated problem that might make you feel worried or confused. It doesn't seem to be trying to help anyone or make things better. It's just telling a story about a fight, and it doesn't give you any ideas on how to fix it or what to do about it. So, it's not very useful for learning or doing something helpful.

"The Vice-Chancellor informed the Governor that Dr. Kumar's return to campus was unauthorized and against clear directives."

This sentence uses strong language to portray Dr. Kumar's actions as unauthorized and against official rules. It makes Dr. Kumar seem like he is breaking the rules and going against orders. The word "unauthorized" makes it sound like Dr. Kumar is doing something wrong.

The text portrays a complex and tense administrative crisis at Kerala University, and the emotions expressed within it are varied and intense. The primary emotion that permeates the narrative is anger, which is evident in the actions and words of various parties involved. The Vice-Chancellor's rejection of files and his directive to not process documents signed by Dr. Kumar showcases his frustration and a sense of authority, as he asserts his power over university affairs. This anger is further highlighted by his instruction to university officials, emphasizing a lack of tolerance for any deviation from his orders.

The Syndicate members, particularly those with leftist affiliations, express their anger and concern over the Vice-Chancellor's actions, which they perceive as violations of statutory procedures. Their call for an urgent meeting and their emphasis on the importance of digital system access credentials reveal a sense of urgency and a desire to protect the university's integrity.

Dr. Kumar's continued presence on campus, despite the Vice-Chancellor's orders, suggests a defiance that could be interpreted as anger or a strong determination to uphold his position. His suggestion to wait for developments without elaborating further adds a layer of mystery and tension to the narrative, leaving the reader curious and perhaps frustrated by the lack of clarity.

The students' protest, organized by the Students' Federation of India (SFI), is a powerful display of anger and frustration. They perceive the Vice-Chancellor's actions as a politicization of university governance, which affects their education and welfare. Their protest is a direct response to this perceived injustice, aiming to draw attention to the crisis and urge authorities to intervene.

The emotions in this text are used to create a sense of urgency and to highlight the severity of the situation. The anger expressed by various parties, from the Vice-Chancellor's directives to the students' protest, serves to emphasize the importance of the issue and the need for immediate action. The narrative's emotional tone builds a sense of sympathy for the students, whose education is at stake, and for Dr. Kumar, who faces opposition despite his continued presence on campus.

The writer's use of emotional language and descriptive phrases adds depth to the narrative. Words like "escalated," "violations," and "unauthorized" paint a picture of a tense and chaotic situation. The repetition of the Vice-Chancellor's directives and the emphasis on Dr. Kumar's continued presence on campus despite orders to the contrary create a sense of persistence and determination, which adds to the emotional impact.

The text's emotional appeal is a powerful tool to persuade the reader to take the situation seriously and to understand the potential consequences for the university and its students. By evoking strong emotions, the writer aims to influence the reader's opinion and potentially inspire action, whether it be support for the Vice-Chancellor's position or a call for a resolution that protects the university's integrity and the students' interests.