Prime Minister Narendra Modi condemned the recent terror attack in Pahalgam during his address at the 17th Brics summit held in Rio de Janeiro. He described the attack, which occurred on April 22nd, as a significant blow to humanity and called for global unity against terrorism. Modi emphasized that the Brics nations shared a strong stance against such acts, declaring zero tolerance for terrorism.

In his speech, he also highlighted the necessity for better representation of developing countries in global institutions like the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and World Bank. He stressed that diversity and multipolarity are essential for shaping a new world order. Additionally, Modi proposed establishing a science and research repository within Brics to enhance collaboration among member countries and advocated for increased support for sustainable development initiatives in developing nations.

Original article

This article provides limited value to an average individual. In terms of actionability, the article does not offer concrete steps or guidance that readers can take. Instead, it focuses on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech at the 17th Brics summit, which is more of a statement than a call to action. The article lacks educational depth as it does not provide explanations of causes, consequences, or systems related to the terror attack or the Brics summit. It simply reports on Modi's words without adding any meaningful context or analysis.

The subject matter may have some personal relevance for individuals living in India or those interested in international politics, but its impact is likely to be indirect and limited. The article does not serve any significant public service function, as it does not provide access to official statements, safety protocols, or emergency contacts that readers can use.

The article's practicality of recommendations is also low, as it does not offer realistic or achievable steps for readers to take. Instead, it presents Modi's proposals and ideas without evaluating their feasibility or potential impact. The content has limited potential for long-term impact and sustainability, as it focuses on a specific event and does not encourage lasting positive effects.

In terms of constructive emotional or psychological impact, the article primarily conveys a sense of concern and outrage rather than promoting resilience, hope, critical thinking, or empowerment. Finally, while the article appears to be informative in nature, its primary purpose seems to be reporting on Modi's speech rather than generating clicks or serving advertisements.

Overall, this article provides mostly informational content without adding much value in terms of actionability, educational depth, personal relevance, public service utility, practicality of recommendations, long-term impact and sustainability, constructive emotional or psychological impact.

The input text conveys a range of emotions, primarily driven by the Prime Minister's condemnation of the terror attack in Pahalgam and his call for global unity against terrorism. The strongest emotion expressed is outrage, which appears in the phrase "significant blow to humanity." This phrase serves to emphasize the severity of the attack and its impact on human life, evoking a sense of shock and disgust. The use of strong action words like "condemned" and "described" reinforces this emotion, creating a sense of urgency and gravity.

Modi's emphasis on global unity against terrorism also expresses a sense of determination and resilience. The phrase "zero tolerance for terrorism" is repeated throughout the text, serving as a rallying cry for collective action against this scourge. This determination is further emphasized by Modi's proposal to establish a science and research repository within Brics, highlighting the importance of collaboration in addressing global challenges.

In addition to these emotions, there is also a sense of frustration underlying Modi's comments on the need for better representation of developing countries in global institutions like the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and World Bank. This frustration is implicit in his statement that diversity and multipolarity are essential for shaping a new world order, suggesting that current power structures are inadequate.

The writer uses various tools to create an emotional impact. For instance, repeating key phrases like "zero tolerance for terrorism" creates a sense of rhythm and emphasis, making it more memorable for readers. By using vivid language like "significant blow to humanity," Modi creates an image that resonates with readers' emotions.

Moreover, by emphasizing diversity and multipolarity as essential components of shaping a new world order, Modi taps into readers' aspirations for fairness and equality. This emotional appeal helps build trust with readers who share these values.

However, it's worth noting that some emotions may be subtly manipulated or exaggerated to sway readers' opinions or create sympathy. For example, when describing the terror attack as a "significant blow to humanity," Modi may be intentionally downplaying its severity or using emotive language to elicit sympathy from his audience.

To stay in control while reading this text requires critical thinking skills such as identifying emotional appeals and recognizing potential biases or exaggerations. By being aware of how emotions are used throughout the text, readers can make more informed decisions about what they believe or how they respond emotionally.

Ultimately, understanding how emotions shape our perception can help us navigate complex issues more effectively. By recognizing emotional manipulation techniques used in persuasive writing like this one – such as repetition or comparison – we can develop our critical thinking skills further; thus becoming better equipped at evaluating information objectively rather than relying solely on feelings when making decisions based upon what we read

The text presents a clear example of virtue signaling, where Prime Minister Narendra Modi condemns the terror attack in Pahalgam and calls for global unity against terrorism. This statement is biased because it assumes that terrorism is inherently evil and that the international community should unite against it, without acknowledging the complexities of the issue or the various perspectives on terrorism. By framing terrorism as a monolithic evil, Modi's statement ignores the nuances of different terrorist groups and their motivations, which can be used to justify or condemn their actions. This simplification serves to reinforce a particular narrative about terrorism and its perpetrators, rather than encouraging a more nuanced understanding of the issue.

Modi's statement also employs gaslighting tactics by implying that Brics nations share a strong stance against terrorism, when in reality, some member countries have been accused of supporting or tolerating terrorist groups. By presenting this false narrative, Modi creates a sense of unity among Brics nations on an issue that is actually contentious. This manipulation serves to reinforce his own credibility as a leader who can bring nations together against a common enemy.

The text also exhibits cultural bias by assuming that Western-style democracy and international institutions are superior to other forms of governance. When Modi emphasizes the need for better representation of developing countries in institutions like the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and World Bank, he implies that these institutions are more legitimate or effective than others. However, this assumption ignores alternative forms of governance and decision-making processes used in non-Western societies.

Furthermore, Modi's proposal for establishing a science and research repository within Brics reinforces nationalist bias by prioritizing collaboration among member countries over global cooperation with other nations. By emphasizing Brics' scientific capabilities and promoting regional self-reliance in research and development, Modi creates an us-versus-them mentality between Brics nations and other parts of the world.

In addition to these biases, linguistic manipulation is evident throughout the text. For instance, when Modi describes terrorism as "a significant blow to humanity," he uses emotionally charged language to create an emotional response from his audience rather than engaging with complex policy issues related to counter-terrorism strategies or human rights concerns.

Moreover, structural bias is embedded in Modi's emphasis on increasing support for sustainable development initiatives in developing nations without addressing systemic issues such as poverty inequality or exploitation by multinational corporations. By focusing solely on providing aid without challenging existing power structures or economic systems perpetuating poverty worldwide; we see how structural bias works hand-in-hand with neoliberal ideology here - reinforcing dominant narratives around free markets & globalization while obscuring systemic injustices faced globally today!

Selection bias becomes apparent when considering sources cited within this article: since no credible sources backing up claims made here were provided; one cannot verify whether information presented accurately reflects real-world events; thus reinforcing confirmation bias inherent within any single narrative presented without evidence supporting opposing views being included either