Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the 17th BRICS Summit in Brazil, where he condemned terrorism as a serious threat to humanity. His remarks came during a session focused on peace, security, and the need for reform in global governance. He highlighted the urgent need for changes in international institutions to better address modern challenges faced by developing countries.

Modi welcomed the collective condemnation from BRICS members regarding a recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam, emphasizing that such acts are attacks on all humanity. He stressed that those who fund or shelter terrorists should face severe consequences.

During his speech, Modi pointed out that existing global institutions established in the 20th century are inadequate for tackling contemporary issues and called for reforms to make organizations like the UN Security Council and others more representative of current realities. He advocated for a multipolar world order and suggested that BRICS could play an essential role in shaping this new balance.

Additionally, Modi proposed creating a research and science repository within BRICS to enhance cooperation on artificial intelligence and critical minerals supply chains. He also planned to discuss environmental issues and health initiatives at future sessions during the summit.

The joint declaration from the summit reflected India's priorities, particularly emphasizing reforms needed within global multilateral institutions like the UN Security Council to better represent developing nations' interests.

Original article

The article about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's address at the 17th BRICS Summit in Brazil offers some value, but its impact is limited by its focus on high-level diplomatic discussions and lack of concrete, actionable information for the average individual. In terms of actionability, the article does not provide any specific steps or guidance that readers can take to address terrorism or reform global institutions. While it mentions the need for changes in international institutions, it does not offer concrete suggestions or resources for readers to get involved.

In terms of educational depth, the article provides some background information on the BRICS Summit and Modi's remarks, but it lacks technical knowledge or explanations of complex issues like global governance reform. It primarily presents surface-level facts without delving deeper into causes, consequences, or historical context.

The article has personal relevance only in a very indirect sense. While terrorism is a global issue that affects many people, Modi's speech does not directly address how individuals can protect themselves or make a difference in this area. The discussion of reforms to global institutions may have long-term implications for economic development and international relations, but these are abstract concepts that may not directly impact most readers' daily lives.

From a public service function perspective, the article provides some information about official statements and diplomatic efforts to address terrorism and reform global institutions. However, it does not offer access to safety protocols, emergency contacts, or other practical resources that readers can use.

The article's practicality of recommendations is low because it focuses on high-level policy discussions rather than providing concrete steps that individuals can take. The proposal to create a research and science repository within BRICS is vague and lacks specifics on how this would be implemented or what benefits it would bring.

In terms of long-term impact and sustainability, the article discusses potential reforms to global institutions that could have lasting positive effects on international relations and economic development. However, these are abstract concepts that may not directly benefit most readers in their daily lives.

The article has a constructive emotional or psychological impact because it presents Modi's condemnation of terrorism as a serious threat to humanity as well as his emphasis on cooperation among nations to address this issue. These messages promote hope and resilience in the face of adversity.

Finally, while the article appears to be written for informative purposes rather than solely to generate clicks or serve advertisements (there are no pop-ups or sensational headlines), its content is largely focused on reporting official statements rather than providing new insights or practical guidance for readers. Overall, while the article provides some background information on diplomatic efforts to address terrorism and reform global institutions, its value is limited by its lack of concrete actionability and educational depth.

The input text conveys a range of emotions, from condemnation and anger to urgency and optimism. One of the most prominent emotions is condemnation, which appears in Modi's statement that terrorism is a "serious threat to humanity." This strong language sets the tone for the rest of the speech, emphasizing the gravity of the issue. The condemnation is further emphasized when Modi welcomes the collective condemnation from BRICS members regarding a recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam, highlighting that such acts are "attacks on all humanity." This repetition serves to strengthen the emotional impact, making it clear that terrorism is not just a regional issue but a global concern.

The emotion of urgency is also palpable throughout the text. Modi stresses that existing global institutions are "inadequate for tackling contemporary issues," implying that there is no time to waste in reforming them. This sense of urgency drives his call for reforms to make organizations like the UN Security Council more representative of current realities. The use of words like "urgent" and "contemporary" creates a sense of immediacy, emphasizing that change is necessary now.

In contrast, there are moments where optimism and hope emerge. Modi's proposal to create a research and science repository within BRICS suggests a positive vision for cooperation on artificial intelligence and critical minerals supply chains. This idea presents an opportunity for collaboration and progress, offering a glimmer of hope for addressing global challenges.

Another emotion present in the text is pride. When Modi emphasizes India's priorities through the joint declaration from the summit, it implies that he takes pride in representing India's interests on an international stage. This pride serves as motivation for him to advocate for reforms within global multilateral institutions.

The writer uses various tools to create an emotional impact on readers. Repeating ideas like condemning terrorism creates emphasis and reinforces key messages. Telling stories about recent terrorist attacks adds context and highlights their severity. Comparing existing institutions with modern challenges makes them sound inadequate or outdated, creating dissatisfaction with their current state.

Moreover, using phrases like "serious threat" or "attacks on all humanity" makes these issues sound extreme rather than neutral or manageable problems. These rhetorical devices aim to steer readers' attention towards recognizing these issues as critical concerns requiring immediate action.

However, knowing where emotions are used can also help readers stay alert about potential biases or manipulations in messages they read or hear about international relations or other complex topics involving multiple stakeholders with competing interests.

It becomes clear how this emotional structure can be used both positively – by engaging people emotionally – as well as negatively – by pushing people into certain opinions without considering alternative perspectives thoroughly enough before forming conclusions based solely upon what one feels rather than what one knows factually

The text presents a clear example of virtue signaling, where Prime Minister Narendra Modi condemns terrorism as a serious threat to humanity, emphasizing that such acts are attacks on all humanity. This statement is meant to evoke a sense of moral outrage and shared values among the BRICS nations, creating a false appearance of unity and cooperation. The quote "He stressed that those who fund or shelter terrorists should face severe consequences" reinforces this sentiment, implying that the international community is united in its condemnation of terrorism. However, this statement lacks specificity and concrete actions, making it more of a rhetorical gesture than an actual commitment to addressing the issue.

The text also employs gaslighting techniques by presenting Modi's views as universally accepted truths. For instance, when he says "existing global institutions established in the 20th century are inadequate for tackling contemporary issues," it implies that everyone agrees with this assessment. This creates a false narrative that there is no debate or dissent within the international community regarding global governance reform. The quote "He advocated for a multipolar world order and suggested that BRICS could play an essential role in shaping this new balance" further reinforces this notion, presenting Modi's vision as the only viable alternative.

The text exhibits cultural bias by framing India's priorities within the context of Western-style democracy and global governance. The emphasis on reforms within international institutions like the UN Security Council suggests that these institutions are inherently flawed and need to be reformed according to Western standards. This ignores alternative perspectives from non-Western countries and reinforces the idea that Western values are universal and superior. The quote "He highlighted the urgent need for changes in international institutions to better address modern challenges faced by developing countries" implies that developing countries require Western-style reforms to address their challenges.

Nationalism is also present in the text through Modi's emphasis on India's role in shaping a multipolar world order. By suggesting that BRICS can play an essential role in shaping this new balance, Modi implies that India has a unique perspective on global governance and should be recognized as a key player on the world stage. This nationalist sentiment is reinforced by his proposal for creating a research and science repository within BRICS, which would enhance cooperation on artificial intelligence and critical minerals supply chains.

Sex-based bias is not explicitly present in the text; however, it does assume binary classification based on reproductive anatomy when discussing gender identities or non-binary classifications are not mentioned at all.

Economic bias is evident through Modi's emphasis on reforming global institutions to better address modern challenges faced by developing countries. This implies that economic development is solely dependent on institutional reforms rather than addressing systemic issues like poverty, inequality, or exploitation by multinational corporations. The quote "He proposed creating a research and science repository within BRICS to enhance cooperation on artificial intelligence and critical minerals supply chains" highlights this bias by prioritizing technological advancements over social welfare or environmental concerns.

Linguistic bias manifests through emotionally charged language used throughout the text. Phrases like "serious threat to humanity," "attacks on all humanity," or "severe consequences" create an emotional response rather than providing factual information about terrorism or its impact on human societies.

Selection bias becomes apparent when considering sources cited throughout the text; none are provided except for general statements attributed directly from Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his speech at 17th BRICS Summit without any specific evidence from credible sources outside his own words being presented here either way