External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar met with his counterparts from Russia, Iran, and Mexico during the 17th BRICS Summit held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. These meetings took place on July 6, 2025, where discussions focused on various topics including bilateral cooperation and regional developments.

In his meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Jaishankar addressed issues related to cooperation between the two nations as well as broader topics concerning West Asia and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO). He expressed satisfaction about their discussion on social media.

Jaishankar also engaged with Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi to discuss recent regional developments. Additionally, he met with Juan Ramon de la Fuente, Secretary of Foreign Affairs of Mexico. Their conversation centered around enhancing bilateral partnerships in areas such as health, technology, and space.

The BRICS grouping has gained significance by uniting major emerging economies that collectively represent a substantial portion of the global population and trade. Originally consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, BRICS expanded in 2024 to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates; Indonesia joined in 2025.

Original article

This article provides limited value to an average individual. In terms of actionability, the article does not offer concrete steps, survival strategies, or safety procedures that readers can directly apply to their lives. Instead, it reports on diplomatic meetings and discussions between foreign ministers without providing actionable guidance.

The article's educational depth is also shallow. While it mentions the BRICS grouping and its expansion, it does not explain the underlying causes, consequences, or historical context of this development. The article simply states facts without providing any technical knowledge or uncommon information that could equip readers to understand the topic more clearly.

In terms of personal relevance, the article's subject matter is unlikely to impact most readers' real lives directly. The discussions between foreign ministers are primarily focused on international relations and regional developments, which may have indirect effects on global trade and politics but are unlikely to influence individual decisions or behavior.

The article does not serve a significant public service function. It does not provide access to official statements, safety protocols, emergency contacts, or resources that readers can use. Instead, it appears to exist mainly as a news report with no added value beyond reporting on diplomatic meetings.

The practicality of recommendations is also lacking. The article does not provide any specific advice or guidance that readers can realistically apply to their lives.

In terms of long-term impact and sustainability, the article encourages no lasting positive effects. It reports on short-term diplomatic developments without promoting behaviors or policies that have enduring benefits.

The article has a neutral constructive emotional or psychological impact. While it may inform readers about international events, it does not foster positive emotional responses such as resilience, hope, critical thinking, or empowerment.

Finally, this article primarily exists to report news rather than generate clicks or serve advertisements. However, its lack of actionable content and educational depth means that even as a straightforward news report, it falls short in providing meaningful value to an average individual reader

The input text conveys a range of emotions, from satisfaction and excitement to a sense of unity and cooperation. One of the most prominent emotions expressed is satisfaction, which appears in the phrase "expressed satisfaction about their discussion on social media" in the context of Jaishankar's meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. This emotion is strong and serves to convey a positive tone, highlighting the success of the meeting. The purpose of this emotion is to reassure readers that the discussions between Jaishankar and Lavrov were productive and fruitful.

Another emotion present in the text is excitement, which can be inferred from phrases such as "engaged with" and "centered around." These words create a sense of dynamism and energy, suggesting that Jaishankar was actively involved in his meetings with Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi and Juan Ramon de la Fuente, Secretary of Foreign Affairs of Mexico. This emotion helps guide the reader's reaction by creating a sense of enthusiasm and optimism about the potential outcomes of these meetings.

The text also conveys a sense of unity and cooperation among BRICS member countries. Phrases such as "united major emerging economies" and "collectively represent a substantial portion of the global population and trade" create an image of solidarity among nations working together towards common goals. This emotion serves to build trust among readers, emphasizing that BRICS countries are committed to cooperation.

Furthermore, words like "enhancing bilateral partnerships" suggest a positive tone, implying that relationships between countries are being strengthened. This emotion helps inspire action by encouraging readers to view international cooperation as beneficial for all parties involved.

The writer uses various tools to create an emotional impact on readers. For instance, repeating ideas such as "discussions focused on various topics including bilateral cooperation" creates emphasis on key themes without becoming too repetitive or tedious for readers.

Comparing one idea to another can also increase emotional impact; for example, describing BRICS as uniting major emerging economies highlights its significance compared to other international organizations or alliances.

Making something sound more extreme than it is can be seen in phrases like "substantial portion," which emphasizes just how significant BRICS' collective influence truly is.

However, it's essential for readers to recognize when emotions are being used strategically rather than presenting facts objectively. Knowing where emotions are used allows readers to stay informed about what they're reading without being swayed by emotional manipulation alone.

To maintain control over their understanding while reading texts like this one requires attention not only to specific words but also their context within sentences or paragraphs – recognizing how certain expressions contribute positively toward shaping opinions rather than merely presenting neutral information will help foster critical thinking skills necessary when evaluating any given piece written content whether persuasive essay news article etc

The text presents a neutral tone, but upon closer examination, several biases and manipulations become apparent. One of the most notable biases is cultural bias, particularly in the way it portrays the BRICS grouping as a unifying force for "major emerging economies." This phrase implies that these countries are somehow inferior to more established economies and that their unity is a remarkable achievement. The text states, "The BRICS grouping has gained significance by uniting major emerging economies that collectively represent a substantial portion of the global population and trade." This sentence creates a sense of awe and admiration for the BRICS nations, suggesting that their unity is something to be celebrated.

Another type of bias present in the text is linguistic bias through emotionally charged language. The phrase "gained significance" creates a positive connotation, implying that the BRICS grouping has become more important or influential over time. This language choice influences the reader's perception of the group's importance and reinforces its positive image. Additionally, words like "substantial" and "remarkable" contribute to this emotional tone.

Structural bias is also evident in the way information is presented. The text focuses primarily on Jaishankar's meetings with his counterparts from Russia, Iran, and Mexico during the 17th BRICS Summit. While these meetings are certainly significant events, they are not presented as part of a larger context or critique of global politics or economics. Instead, they are framed as isolated incidents within an otherwise neutral narrative about international cooperation.

Selection bias becomes apparent when examining which countries are included in or excluded from discussions about global politics and economics. For instance, Egypt joined BRICS in 2024 but receives no mention in this article despite being part of this expanded group. Similarly, South Africa's inclusion as one of the original members seems inconsequential compared to newer additions like Ethiopia or Indonesia.

Confirmation bias can be detected when examining how certain facts or viewpoints are selectively presented without evidence or counterarguments being included for balance purposes – such as when discussing regional developments between India (Jaishankar) & Iran (Araghchi).