In Ghaziabad, a woman named Akanksha and her mother were involved in a brutal assault on Akanksha's elderly mother-in-law, Sudesh Devi. The incident occurred in Sudesh's home on July 1 and was captured on CCTV. The footage showed Akanksha and her mother pushing, hitting, and dragging Sudesh to the ground while beating her.

Initially, when Sudesh attempted to seek help from the police, they refused to file a First Information Report (FIR). It was reported that the delay in action might have been due to connections that Akanksha's family had within the police department. However, after the CCTV footage went viral on social media, authorities took notice and registered an FIR against both Akanksha and her mother for their actions.

Original article

This article provides some actionable information, but it is limited to reporting on a specific incident and does not offer concrete steps or guidance that readers can apply to their own lives. The article does not provide educational depth, as it does not explain the causes or consequences of domestic violence or offer insights into the systems that enable such behavior. The subject matter is personally relevant only in a very narrow sense, as it involves a specific family and their actions, but it does not have broader implications for readers' daily lives or wellbeing.

The article serves no public service function beyond reporting on an incident, and it does not provide access to official statements, safety protocols, emergency contacts, or resources that readers can use. The recommendations implicit in the article - such as seeking help from authorities - are practical and achievable for most readers.

However, the article's potential for long-term impact and sustainability is limited by its focus on a single incident rather than promoting systemic change or educating readers about domestic violence prevention. The article also has some constructive emotional impact by highlighting the severity of domestic violence and encouraging empathy for victims.

Ultimately, this article appears to exist primarily to report on a shocking incident rather than to inform, educate, or help readers in a meaningful way. While it may generate clicks due to its sensational nature, its value lies mainly in raising awareness about domestic violence rather than providing actionable advice or promoting positive change.

The input text is a disturbing account of a brutal assault on an elderly woman, Sudesh Devi, by her daughter-in-law Akanksha and her mother. The emotions expressed in the text are predominantly negative, conveying a sense of outrage, disgust, and concern for the victim's well-being.

One of the strongest emotions expressed in the text is anger. This emotion appears when describing the actions of Akanksha and her mother: "pushing, hitting, and dragging Sudesh to the ground while beating her." The use of strong action words like "beating" creates a vivid image that evokes feelings of anger and frustration in the reader. The purpose of this emotional appeal is to create sympathy for Sudesh and outrage against Akanksha and her mother's actions.

The text also conveys sadness and concern for Sudesh's well-being. When it is reported that Sudesh attempted to seek help from the police but was refused, it creates a sense of despair and hopelessness. This emotional appeal serves to emphasize the gravity of the situation and highlight the need for action.

The writer uses emotional language to create a sense of urgency and importance around this issue. Phrases like "brutal assault" and "viral on social media" are used to create a sense of shock and outrage. The use of words like "elderly woman" also adds an element of vulnerability, which elicits feelings of sympathy from the reader.

The writer also uses repetition to emphasize certain points. For example, when mentioning that Akanksha's family had connections within the police department that may have contributed to their delay in taking action, it creates a sense of distrust towards those in power. This repetition serves to reinforce negative emotions towards those responsible for failing Sudesh.

Furthermore, by highlighting how social media played a crucial role in bringing attention to this incident ("viral on social media"), the writer emphasizes how public opinion can be swayed by such events. This serves as an implicit call-to-action for readers to take notice and potentially become involved or vocal about similar issues.

In terms of persuasive techniques used by the writer, there are several notable examples. One such technique is comparing one thing (Akanksha's actions) with another (the normal behavior expected from individuals). By portraying Akanksha as someone who committed such heinous acts against her own mother-in-law ("her own flesh"), it highlights how extreme these actions were compared to what would be considered acceptable behavior between family members.

Another technique used by the writer is making something sound more extreme than it actually was (e.g., describing Akanksha's actions as "brutal"). By using strong language like this throughout their narrative they amplify what might otherwise seem like simply violent acts into truly horrific crimes worthy not just condemnation but public outcry too!

Finally examining how these emotions help guide our reaction reveals they aim primarily at creating sympathy & inspiring outrage - both reactions which should naturally motivate readers into wanting justice served & greater awareness raised regarding domestic violence within families especially elder abuse cases where perpetrators often hold positions power over victims due personal relationships ties rather than purely financial gain motives alone thus highlighting need stronger societal norms protecting vulnerable populations before harm occurs rather after fact

The text presents several forms of bias, starting with virtue signaling. The phrase "brutal assault" (1) creates a strong emotional response, implying that the actions of Akanksha and her mother are particularly heinous. This language choice serves to elicit sympathy for Sudesh Devi and condemnation of Akanksha's family. The use of "brutal" also implies a level of premeditation, further reinforcing the negative portrayal of Akanksha's actions.

The text also employs gaslighting through the statement that the police initially refused to file an FIR due to connections that Akanksha's family had within the police department (2). This implies that the police were complicit in covering up the incident, rather than simply following procedure. The use of "connections" suggests a level of corruption, further reinforcing the negative portrayal of Akanksha's family.

The text exhibits cultural bias through its assumption that violence against an elderly woman is inherently wrong and deserving of condemnation. The phrase "elderly mother-in-law" (3) creates a sense of vulnerability and respectability for Sudesh Devi, implying that she is deserving of protection and care. This assumption is rooted in Western cultural values, which prioritize respect for elders and intergenerational relationships.

The text also presents sex-based bias through its portrayal of Akanksha as a violent aggressor. The phrase "Akanksha... was involved in a brutal assault on her elderly mother-in-law" (4) implies that women are inherently prone to violence or aggression when they are not fulfilling traditional feminine roles. This stereotype is reinforced by the fact that Sudesh Devi is portrayed as a victim who requires protection from her daughter-in-law.

Economic bias is present in the text through its lack of discussion about poverty or socioeconomic factors that may have contributed to the incident. The phrase "Sudesh attempted to seek help from the police" (5) implies that access to justice is readily available, without considering whether economic or social barriers may have prevented Sudesh from seeking help earlier.

Linguistic bias is evident in the use of emotionally charged language throughout the text. Phrases such as "brutal assault," "pushing," "hitting," and "dragging" create a vivid image in the reader's mind, evoking feelings of outrage and sympathy for Sudesh Devi (6). This language choice serves to manipulate the reader's emotions, rather than providing a neutral or objective account.

Selection bias is present in the text through its focus on one side of the story – namely, Sudesh Devi's perspective – without providing any context about Akanksha's motivations or circumstances leading up to the incident (7). By only presenting one side of the story, the text creates an unbalanced narrative that reinforces certain biases over others.

Structural bias is evident in the way authority systems are presented without challenge or critique. The phrase "authorities took notice and registered an FIR against both Akanksha and her mother" (8) implies that authority figures are always acting justly and impartially, without considering potential power imbalances or systemic issues within institutions like law enforcement.

Confirmation bias is present in this passage when it states: “However after CCTV footage went viral on social media authorities took notice”(9). Here it assumes social media has some kind power over authorities which can make them take action whereas if there was no social media coverage perhaps they wouldn’t have taken action at all