The Congress party highlighted the legacy of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as current Prime Minister Narendra Modi attended the 17th BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro. The summit began on a Sunday, with Modi arriving in Brazil after visiting several other countries, including Ghana and Argentina.

Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh noted the origins of BRICS and India's significant role during its 2012 summit when Singh proposed creating a BRICS Development Bank. Ramesh recalled that the idea for a trilateral forum involving Russia, India, and China was first suggested by Russian Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov in 1998 to promote multipolarity in global affairs. The term "BRIC" emerged from a 2001 report by Jim O'Neill at Goldman Sachs, identifying Brazil, Russia, India, and China as key future economies.

The first official BRIC summit took place in June 2009 in Russia with Singh's participation. South Africa joined the group in 2010, leading to its current name: BRICS. Recently added members include Egypt and the UAE.

During his visit to Brazil for this summit, Modi received a ceremonial welcome at Galeao International Airport. This trip is part of his broader five-nation tour that will conclude with a visit to Namibia.

Original article

This article provides limited value to an average individual. In terms of actionability, the article does not offer concrete steps or guidance that readers can directly apply to their lives. It primarily serves as a news piece, reporting on the 17th BRICS Summit and India's participation, without providing actionable information or advice.

Regarding educational depth, the article provides some historical context and background information on the origins of BRICS, but it lacks in-depth analysis or explanation of complex concepts. The article mainly presents facts without exploring their causes, consequences, or implications.

The subject matter has personal relevance only for those interested in international politics and economics, particularly those living in countries participating in BRICS. However, for most readers, this content is unlikely to impact their daily lives directly.

The article does not serve a significant public service function, as it does not provide access to official statements, safety protocols, emergency contacts, or resources that readers can use.

In terms of practicality of recommendations, there are no specific recommendations or advice provided in the article. The content is primarily descriptive and lacks concrete guidance that readers can apply.

The potential for long-term impact and sustainability is limited, as the article focuses on a single event (the 17th BRICS Summit) rather than promoting behaviors or policies with lasting positive effects.

The article has a neutral emotional tone and does not aim to foster constructive emotional responses such as resilience or hope. Therefore, its constructive emotional or psychological impact is minimal.

Finally, while the article appears to be written for informative purposes rather than solely to generate clicks or serve advertisements (there are no obvious signs of clickbait headlines or excessive pop-ups), its primary purpose seems to be reporting on current events rather than providing actionable insights or educational value.

The input text is a news report that highlights the significance of the 17th BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro, where current Prime Minister Narendra Modi attended alongside other world leaders. Upon examining the text, several emotions emerge that shape the message and guide the reader's reaction.

One of the dominant emotions expressed is pride, which appears when Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh recalls India's significant role in shaping the BRICS organization. Ramesh notes that former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh proposed creating a BRICS Development Bank during India's 2012 summit, showcasing India's leadership and vision. This pride is evident in Ramesh's tone, as he highlights India's achievements and contributions to global affairs. The purpose of this emotional appeal is to build trust and credibility in India's leadership role within BRICS.

Another emotion that emerges is nostalgia, which appears when Ramesh recalls the origins of BRICS and its evolution over time. He mentions Russian Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov's suggestion for a trilateral forum involving Russia, India, and China in 1998, highlighting the group's commitment to promoting multipolarity in global affairs. This nostalgic tone creates a sense of continuity and stability, underscoring BRICS' enduring relevance in today's world.

The text also conveys a sense of excitement or anticipation through Modi's visit to Brazil for the summit. The ceremonial welcome he received at Galeao International Airport suggests a sense of importance and prestige associated with his visit. This emotional appeal aims to create enthusiasm and interest among readers about Modi's diplomatic efforts.

Furthermore, there is an underlying tone of respect or admiration for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh throughout the text. Ramesh praises Singh for his vision and leadership in proposing the creation of a BRICS Development Bank, demonstrating appreciation for Singh's legacy.

To persuade readers, the writer employs various emotional tools such as repetition (noting India's significant role multiple times), storytelling (recalling key events from BRICS' history), comparison (highlighting similarities between different leaders' visions), and emphasis (underscoring Modi's ceremonial welcome). These tools increase emotional impact by making key points more memorable and engaging.

However, it is essential to recognize how these emotional appeals can shape opinions or limit clear thinking. By emphasizing pride and nostalgia associated with Indian leadership within BRICS, readers may be less likely to critically evaluate Modi's policies or question India's role within international organizations. Similarly, by highlighting excitement around Modi's visit without providing detailed information about its outcomes or implications may lead readers to focus on superficial aspects rather than substance.

In conclusion, understanding where emotions are used makes it easier to distinguish between facts and feelings when reading news reports like this one. By recognizing these emotional appeals explicitly stated here can help readers stay informed while maintaining their critical thinking skills

The text begins with a clear example of virtue signaling, where the Congress party highlights the legacy of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in relation to the BRICS Summit. This is done to promote a positive image of Singh and by extension, the Congress party. The phrase "highlighted the legacy" is used to create a sense of nostalgia and respect for Singh's achievements, which is a classic technique used in virtue signaling. This sets a tone for the rest of the article, which will likely present Modi's actions in a more critical light.

The text also employs gaslighting when it mentions that Jairam Ramesh recalled that "the idea for a trilateral forum involving Russia, India, and China was first suggested by Russian Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov in 1998." This creates an impression that India played a significant role in shaping BRICS from its inception. However, this statement ignores the fact that BRIC was initially proposed by Jim O'Neill at Goldman Sachs in 2001 as an economic grouping of Brazil, Russia, India, and China. By selectively presenting information and omitting key details, Ramesh's statement gaslights readers into believing that India was instrumental in creating BRICS.

The language used in the text also exhibits cultural bias when it describes Modi receiving "a ceremonial welcome at Galeao International Airport." The use of "ceremonial" implies that this welcome is somehow exceptional or extraordinary, which may not be true. This phrase creates an image of grandeur and importance around Modi's visit to Brazil. Furthermore, this description assumes that readers are familiar with Brazilian customs and protocols surrounding state visits.

Nationalist bias is evident when it mentions that Modi attended the 17th BRICS Summit as part of his broader five-nation tour. The emphasis on Modi's itinerary creates an impression that his foreign policy initiatives are centered around strengthening ties with other nations while promoting Indian interests abroad. This narrative reinforces nationalist sentiments within India.

Sex-based bias is absent from this text; however; there are some implicit assumptions about leadership roles being held by men (e.g., Prime Ministers).

Economic bias can be seen when discussing large corporations like Goldman Sachs without mentioning their potential influence on global economic policies or their role as financial advisors to governments worldwide.

Linguistic bias manifests itself through emotionally charged language such as describing Modi receiving "a ceremonial welcome." The use of such language evokes feelings rather than providing objective information about events unfolding during his visit to Brazil.

Structural bias exists because authority systems like governments are presented without critique or challenge throughout this article; instead they're portrayed positively reinforcing existing power structures without questioning their legitimacy or accountability mechanisms.

Confirmation bias emerges when assumptions about future economies based on past trends are accepted without evidence presented within this piece; specifically regarding Jim O'Neill’s report predicting growth patterns among emerging markets including those mentioned under BRIC acronym but no data analysis provided within article itself supports these claims.



Temporal bias becomes apparent due lack historical context surrounding creation & evolution over time especially concerning how term changed from 'BRIC' into 'BRICS'.