The National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT) announced that the choice filling window for Round 1 counselling for 2025 would close today. Candidates interested in securing their seats must visit the official portal, nift.admissions.nic.in, to lock in their choices. The NTA oversees the entrance exam for various undergraduate and postgraduate programs at NIFT, including Bachelor of Design (BDes), Bachelor of Fashion Technology (BFTech), Master of Design (MDes), Master of Fashion Management (MFM), and Master of Fashion Technology (MFTech).

To complete the choice filling process, candidates need to log into the portal, select their preferred campuses and programs in order of preference, and ensure they save and lock their choices before the deadline. The counselling process also requires candidates to register and upload necessary documents for verification before they can fill out their choices. After this step, seat allotment results will be released.

The official notification emphasized that no further extensions would be granted beyond today’s deadline for choice filling.

Original article

This article provides some actionable information, but it is limited to informing readers about a specific deadline for choice filling in the NIFT counselling process. The article advises readers to log into the official portal, select their preferred campuses and programs, and save and lock their choices before the deadline. However, this guidance is not particularly useful or transformative for most readers, as it is a one-time task that does not require ongoing effort or strategy.

The article lacks educational depth, as it does not provide any explanations of causes, consequences, systems, or technical knowledge related to the NIFT counselling process. It simply states facts about the deadline and the necessary steps to take without offering any context or insight.

The subject matter of this article has limited personal relevance for most readers. The NIFT counselling process is likely to impact only those individuals who have applied for admission to NIFT programs. For others, this information may be irrelevant and uninteresting.

The article does not serve a public service function in any meaningful way. It does not provide access to official statements, safety protocols, emergency contacts, or resources that readers can use beyond completing a one-time task.

The practicality of the recommendations in this article is also limited. The advice provided is straightforward but lacks nuance or consideration of potential challenges that readers may face during the choice filling process.

In terms of long-term impact and sustainability, this article has none. It does not encourage behaviors or policies that have lasting positive effects on individuals or society.

The article has no constructive emotional or psychological impact on readers either. It simply presents factual information without attempting to inspire hope, resilience, critical thinking, or empowerment.

Finally, based on its content and structure (a straightforward announcement with no sensational headlines), it appears that this article was written primarily to inform rather than generate clicks or serve advertisements.

The input text conveys a sense of urgency and importance, which is likely to inspire action in the reader. The phrase "candidates interested in securing their seats must visit the official portal" creates a sense of necessity, implying that time is running out and candidates need to act quickly. This creates a feeling of anxiety or worry in the reader, which serves to motivate them to take action.

The text also uses words like "announced" and "official notification" to create a sense of formality and authority, which helps to build trust with the reader. The use of technical terms like "choice filling window" and "seat allotment results" may also create a sense of professionalism and expertise, further building trust.

However, there is no clear expression of happiness or excitement in the text. The tone is generally neutral and informative, with a focus on providing practical information about the counselling process.

The writer uses several tools to increase emotional impact, including repetition (e.g., "candidates need to log into the portal", "candidates need to register") and emphasis on deadlines (e.g., "no further extensions would be granted beyond today's deadline"). These tools serve to reinforce the sense of urgency and importance mentioned earlier.

The writer also uses phrases like "secure their seats" and "lock in their choices", which create a sense of competition or scarcity. This may be intended to motivate candidates who are interested in securing places at NIFT but are not yet certain if they will get one.

Overall, the emotional structure of this text is designed to inspire action in readers who are interested in applying for NIFT programs. By creating a sense of urgency and emphasizing deadlines, the writer aims to motivate readers into taking action quickly. However, this structure can also be seen as manipulative or coercive if readers feel pressured into making decisions without fully considering their options.

Knowing where emotions are used can help readers stay aware of how they are being influenced by language. In this case, it's essential for readers not only understand what they read but also recognize when they're being encouraged or discouraged from taking specific actions based on emotional appeals rather than objective facts.

By recognizing these emotional appeals as persuasive techniques rather than objective truths can help readers make more informed decisions about how much weight they should give them when evaluating information presented online

The text presents a neutral tone on the surface, but upon closer examination, several biases become apparent. One type of bias is linguistic and semantic bias, which is evident in the use of emotionally charged language. The phrase "candidates interested in securing their seats must visit the official portal" creates a sense of urgency and importance, implying that not taking action will result in missing out on an opportunity. This language manipulation aims to motivate readers to take action quickly, without providing any critical evaluation of the process.

The text also exhibits structural and institutional bias by presenting the National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT) as an authority system without challenge or critique. The statement "The NTA oversees the entrance exam for various undergraduate and postgraduate programs at NIFT" implies that NIFT is a legitimate institution deserving of respect, without providing any information about its history, policies, or potential flaws. This framing reinforces a particular narrative about NIFT's credibility and authority.

Another type of bias present in the text is selection and omission bias. The article only mentions specific programs offered by NIFT (Bachelor of Design, Bachelor of Fashion Technology, Master of Design, Master of Fashion Management, and Master of Fashion Technology), while omitting other possible programs or courses that may be available. This selective presentation creates an incomplete picture of what NIFT offers, potentially misleading readers about their options.

The text also contains temporal bias through presentism. The statement "candidates need to log into the portal... before today's deadline" implies that this process has always been conducted in this manner and that there are no historical precedents or alternative methods worth considering. By focusing solely on current practices without acknowledging potential changes or alternatives over time.

Furthermore, economic and class-based bias is subtly embedded in the text through its emphasis on individual responsibility rather than systemic issues affecting access to education. The phrase "candidates interested in securing their seats must visit the official portal" places sole responsibility on individual candidates to navigate complex bureaucratic processes without acknowledging potential barriers such as lack of access to technology or limited financial resources.

Additionally, cultural and ideological bias can be detected through assumptions rooted in Western worldviews regarding education as a meritocratic system where individual effort guarantees success. The statement "candidates need to select their preferred campuses and programs in order of preference" assumes that individuals have equal access to information about different campuses and programs without considering power imbalances based on socioeconomic status or geographical location.

Lastly, sex-based bias can be identified through binary classification based on reproductive anatomy used throughout the article when discussing students' choices for undergraduate courses such as Bachelor's degree courses like BDes (Bachelor's degree course).