The funeral of mobsters Ross Monaghan and Eddie Lyons Jr took place recently, drawing significant attention due to its connection to the film "Braveheart." The service featured a violinist playing the movie's theme, and the order of service included a photo of the two men with a quote from the film: "Every man dies, but not every man really lives."

Monaghan, 44, and Lyons Jr, 46, were shot dead in a bar in Spain on May 31. Their deaths are believed to be linked to ongoing gang rivalries in Glasgow. Hundreds attended their joint funeral at Bishopbriggs Crematorium, causing traffic disruptions in the area. Despite concerns about potential violence during the event, it proceeded without major incidents.

Eddie Lyons Sr., described as visibly affected by his son's death, attended with heavy security. The eulogy highlighted Monaghan and Lyons Jr as beloved family members and friends while acknowledging their notorious reputations within organized crime.

The violent nature of their lives seems reflected in their fondness for "Braveheart," which depicts brutal battles between Scots and English forces. This connection may shed light on the violent history associated with their gang affiliations over many years. Monaghan had previously faced serious charges related to gang violence but had been acquitted.

Their deaths mark another chapter in an ongoing cycle of violence among rival gangs in Scotland.

Original article

This article provides limited value to an average individual. In terms of actionability, the article does not offer concrete steps or guidance that readers can apply to their lives. While it reports on the funeral of two individuals, it does not provide any actionable information or advice that readers can use.

The article's educational depth is also limited, as it primarily reports on a specific event without providing any in-depth analysis or explanation of the underlying causes or consequences. The only educational aspect is a quote from the movie "Braveheart," which is not explored further.

In terms of personal relevance, the article's focus on organized crime and gang violence may be relevant to individuals living in Scotland or those interested in this topic, but its impact on most readers' daily lives is likely to be minimal.

The article does not serve a significant public service function, as it does not provide access to official statements, safety protocols, emergency contacts, or resources that readers can use. Instead, it appears to exist primarily for entertainment purposes.

The practicality of recommendations is non-existent, as there are no recommendations or advice provided in the article.

The potential for long-term impact and sustainability is also low, as the article reports on a specific event without encouraging any lasting positive effects or behaviors.

In terms of constructive emotional or psychological impact, the article may elicit some emotional response due to its reporting on violent deaths, but this impact is likely to be negative rather than constructive.

Finally, based on its sensational headline and lack of substance beyond reporting on an event, it appears that this article primarily exists to generate clicks rather than inform or educate. The excessive attention drawn by the connection between the funeral and "Braveheart" suggests that this aspect was intentionally highlighted for engagement purposes rather than providing meaningful context.

The funeral of Ross Monaghan and Eddie Lyons Jr. highlights a disturbing reality where the lives of individuals embroiled in gang violence are glorified, potentially undermining the moral fabric of families and communities. The use of a theme from 'Braveheart' at their funeral service may be seen as romanticizing a violent lifestyle, which could have detrimental effects on the younger generation and the community at large.

This event raises concerns about the impact of gang culture on family cohesion and community trust. The involvement of family members, such as Eddie Lyons Sr., in the funeral proceedings underscores the complex dynamics between family loyalty and the consequences of violent actions. While it is natural for families to mourn their loved ones, it is essential to acknowledge the harm caused by gang violence and its effects on innocent lives, including children and elders.

The fact that hundreds attended the funeral, causing traffic disruptions, suggests a level of community engagement that could be misinterpreted as support for the deceased individuals' lifestyles. This attention may inadvertently perpetuate a culture that prioritizes loyalty to gangs over responsibility to family and community.

Moreover, the connection between Monaghan and Lyons Jr.'s deaths and ongoing gang rivalries in Glasgow underscores a cycle of violence that threatens the well-being of families, particularly children, who may be drawn into this destructive path. The glorification of violent lifestyles can erode trust within communities, making it more challenging for families to protect their vulnerable members.

In evaluating this situation through the lens of ancestral duty to protect life and balance, it becomes clear that unchecked glorification of gang culture can have severe consequences for families, children yet to be born, community trust, and the stewardship of the land. If this trend continues without being addressed by community leaders and family members alike:

* Families may become increasingly fragmented as they struggle with loyalty to their kin versus condemnation of violent actions. * Children may be more likely to emulate violent behaviors, perpetuating a cycle that undermines their well-being and future prospects. * Community trust will deteriorate further as residents become desensitized to violence or feel compelled to take sides in gang rivalries. * The stewardship of the land will suffer as resources are diverted towards addressing gang-related violence rather than nurturing local environments and economies.

Ultimately, it is crucial for communities affected by gang violence to reassert their commitment to protecting life, promoting peaceful conflict resolution, and upholding clear personal duties that bind families together. By doing so, they can work towards breaking cycles of violence and fostering an environment where children can thrive without being drawn into destructive lifestyles.

The text exhibits a clear narrative bias in its portrayal of the funeral of Ross Monaghan and Eddie Lyons Jr. The author frames the event as a significant occasion, drawing attention to the connection between the deceased and the film "Braveheart." This framing creates a sense of grandeur and importance, which may not be entirely justified by the facts. The text states, "The service featured a violinist playing the movie's theme, and the order of service included a photo of the two men with a quote from the film: 'Every man dies, but not every man really lives.'" This emphasis on symbolism and ritual creates an air of reverence around the event, which may be intended to convey that these individuals were more than just notorious gang members.

This narrative bias is further reinforced by the description of Eddie Lyons Sr. as "visibly affected" by his son's death. The use of this phrase creates an emotional connection between the reader and Lyons Sr., making him appear more sympathetic than he might otherwise be. The text also highlights his presence at the funeral with "heavy security," which serves to underscore his vulnerability in this moment. This selective focus on Lyons Sr.'s emotional state humanizes him in a way that might not have been achieved through other means.

The text also exhibits cultural bias in its interpretation of Scottish culture through its reference to "Braveheart." By highlighting this connection, it reinforces stereotypes about Scotland being associated with violence and brutality. This framing ignores other aspects of Scottish culture that might be relevant to understanding these individuals' lives. Furthermore, it perpetuates a simplistic view that equates Scottishness with violence.

In terms of linguistic bias, there are several instances where emotionally charged language is used to shape public opinion about these individuals' lives. For example, when describing their deaths as part of an ongoing cycle of violence among rival gangs in Scotland, it creates an atmosphere of perpetual danger and instability. Phrases like "violent nature" and "notorious reputations" contribute to this sensationalized tone.

Moreover, structural bias is evident in how authority systems are presented without challenge or critique. The article quotes law enforcement sources or mentions their involvement without questioning their role or methods in addressing gang violence in Glasgow. This lack of critical examination reinforces existing power structures without offering alternative perspectives or solutions.

Selection bias is also present when considering what facts are included or excluded from discussion about these individuals' lives. While their involvement with organized crime is acknowledged, there is no mention made about potential social determinants that may have contributed to their involvement with gangs (e.g., poverty rates among certain communities). Similarly, no discussion takes place regarding potential systemic issues within law enforcement agencies that might perpetuate cycles of violence.

Confirmation bias can be observed when assumptions are accepted without evidence regarding these individuals' connections to Glasgow gang rivalries or their alleged violent pasts being linked directly back into ongoing cycles within Scotland's organized crime landscape – despite concerns raised over whether such narratives accurately reflect all available information available at time publication date given lack concrete proof provided sources cited support claims made throughout piece itself

The input text conveys a range of emotions, from sadness and grief to violence and rivalry. One of the most prominent emotions is sadness, which is evident in the description of the funeral service for Ross Monaghan and Eddie Lyons Jr. The text states that "hundreds attended their joint funeral at Bishopbriggs Crematorium," causing traffic disruptions in the area. This suggests a significant outpouring of support and grief from the community, indicating that Monaghan and Lyons Jr were well-known and respected figures.

The eulogy highlighted their beloved family members and friends while acknowledging their notorious reputations within organized crime. This acknowledgment serves to temper the sadness with a sense of complexity, suggesting that these individuals were multifaceted personalities with both positive and negative aspects.

The quote from "Braveheart" - "Every man dies, but not every man really lives" - adds a layer of poignancy to the proceedings, emphasizing the idea that despite their violent lives, Monaghan and Lyons Jr had lived life to its fullest extent. This quote serves to humanize them, making it easier for readers to connect with them on an emotional level.

However, beneath this surface-level sadness lies a deeper sense of violence and rivalry. The text mentions that Monaghan's death was linked to ongoing gang rivalries in Glasgow, implying a cycle of violence that is difficult to break. The fact that hundreds attended their funeral despite concerns about potential violence suggests a sense of inevitability about this cycle.

The use of words like "violent," "notorious," and "rivalries" creates an atmosphere of tension and foreboding, underscoring the idea that these individuals lived lives marked by conflict and aggression. The text also mentions Eddie Lyons Sr.'s visible distress at his son's death, adding an element of personal tragedy to the narrative.

The writer uses emotional language strategically throughout the text. For example, by describing Monaghan as having been acquitted on serious charges related to gang violence but still being associated with organized crime circles implies a sense of danger lurking beneath the surface. This creates tension in the reader's mind.

Furthermore, by highlighting Monaghan's fondness for "Braveheart," which depicts brutal battles between Scots and English forces, suggests an affinity for violent conflict resolution methods - reinforcing his reputation as someone involved in organized crime circles.

To persuade readers emotionally or create sympathy for those affected by gang-related violence is not explicitly stated; however it does encourage empathy towards those who are victims or family members affected by such situations indirectly through subtle emotional cues embedded within sentences such as 'described as visibly affected'.

This writing structure can be used effectively shape opinions or limit clear thinking if one isn't aware how emotions are being used strategically throughout sentences or paragraphs because they might lead readers into certain conclusions without realizing they're doing so based on feelings rather than facts alone