Google has announced that it is introducing a feature called Gems to its Workspace applications, including Gmail, Docs, and Slides. Gems are custom artificial intelligence (AI) experts designed to perform specific tasks and have been available in the Gemini app since August 2024. This new feature will be accessible through the Gemini side panel in these apps.

Gems allow users to create smaller, specialized versions of the Gemini chatbot. Users can program these Gems with instructions for various tasks without needing to repeat them each time. They can also enhance their responses by providing data such as text, files, and images.

The update includes several pre-made Gems that users can utilize right away. These include tools like a Writing editor for feedback on text, a Brainstormer for project ideas, and a Sales pitch ideator for crafting pitches. Additionally, users have the option to create their own Gems from scratch by specifying roles and instructions.

This feature is currently available only to paid individual and enterprise Workspace account holders who already have access to the Gemini side panel. Once created, any Gem will be visible across all Google Workspace apps being used by the user.

Original article

The article about Google's new feature, Gems, in its Workspace applications provides some actionable information, but it is limited to a specific context. The article tells readers that they can create custom AI experts for specific tasks and provides examples of pre-made Gems that users can utilize. However, this information is primarily useful for individuals who already have access to the Gemini side panel and are using Google Workspace applications. The article does not provide concrete steps or survival strategies that readers can apply in their daily lives.

In terms of educational depth, the article lacks substance beyond surface-level facts. It does not explain the underlying technology or science behind Gems, nor does it provide any historical context or technical knowledge that would equip readers to understand the topic more clearly. The article simply presents a new feature as a solution without delving into its implications or potential consequences.

The subject matter has limited personal relevance for most individuals, as it is primarily aimed at businesses and organizations using Google Workspace applications. While some individuals may use these applications for personal projects or research, the content is unlikely to impact their daily lives or finances directly.

The article does not serve any public service function. It does not provide access to official statements, safety protocols, emergency contacts, or resources that readers can use. Instead, it appears to exist solely as a promotional piece for Google's new feature.

The practicality of any recommendations or advice in the article is also limited. The article suggests creating custom AI experts without providing guidance on how to do so effectively or efficiently. This lack of practical advice reduces the article's actionable value.

In terms of long-term impact and sustainability, the article promotes a short-term solution (using Gems) without considering its potential long-term effects on user behavior or organizational practices.

The constructive emotional or psychological impact of the article is neutral at best. It neither inspires hope nor critical thinking; instead, it presents a new feature as a solution without exploring its potential implications.

Finally, upon closer examination, it appears that this article primarily exists to generate clicks rather than inform or educate readers about something meaningful and substantive. The language used is promotional and lacks depth; there are no signs of excessive pop-ups or sensational headlines with no substance; however there are calls-to-action encouraging users to try out gems which seems like an attempt at engagement rather than adding value through meaningful content

The introduction of AI-powered Gems in Google Workspace applications may have unintended consequences on the social fabric of families and local communities. By relying on artificial intelligence to perform tasks, individuals may become increasingly dependent on technology, potentially eroding their sense of personal responsibility and duty to their kin.

The use of Gems may also lead to a decline in face-to-face interactions and deep, meaningful relationships within families and communities. As people rely more heavily on AI-powered tools to assist with tasks, they may spend less time engaging with each other, sharing knowledge, and building trust. This could ultimately weaken the bonds that hold families and communities together.

Furthermore, the availability of pre-made Gems for tasks such as writing feedback and sales pitch ideation may undermine the importance of human mentorship and guidance. Young people, in particular, may miss out on valuable opportunities to learn from experienced elders and develop essential skills through hands-on practice and feedback.

The fact that this feature is only available to paid individual and enterprise Workspace account holders raises concerns about unequal access to resources and potential exacerbation of existing social inequalities. This could further fracture community cohesion, as those with access to these tools may have an unfair advantage over those without.

In terms of protecting children and elders, there is a risk that over-reliance on AI-powered tools could lead to a lack of human oversight and accountability. For example, if children are using Gems to complete tasks without proper guidance, they may be exposed to inaccurate or inappropriate information. Similarly, elders who are not familiar with AI-powered tools may struggle to keep up with the pace of technological change, potentially leading to feelings of isolation or disconnection.

Ultimately, if the widespread adoption of AI-powered Gems goes unchecked, it could lead to a decline in community trust, a weakening of family bonds, and a lack of personal responsibility. As people become more reliant on technology to perform tasks, they may lose sight of the importance of human relationships and community ties. This could have long-term consequences for the survival and well-being of families and local communities.

In conclusion, while AI-powered Gems may offer short-term benefits in terms of efficiency and productivity, their potential impact on family relationships, community trust, and personal responsibility cannot be ignored. It is essential to consider the potential consequences of relying too heavily on technology and to prioritize human connections, mentorship, and community engagement to ensure the long-term survival and well-being of our kinship bonds.

The text presents a neutral tone, but upon closer examination, several biases and manipulations become apparent. One of the first biases to note is the use of technical jargon, such as "custom artificial intelligence (AI) experts" and "Gemini chatbot," which may create a sense of exclusivity and intimidate readers who are not familiar with these terms. This bias is embedded in the language itself, as it assumes a certain level of technical expertise on the part of the reader. The text states, "Gems are custom artificial intelligence (AI) experts designed to perform specific tasks," which immediately creates a sense of complexity and sophistication that may be off-putting to some readers.

Furthermore, the text presents a selection bias by only mentioning Google's Workspace applications as examples of where Gems can be used. This omission creates an impression that Google's products are more advanced or superior to other productivity tools. The text states, "Gems allow users to create smaller, specialized versions of the Gemini chatbot," without mentioning any potential limitations or drawbacks to this feature. This selective presentation creates an unbalanced view that favors Google's products over others.

The text also exhibits linguistic bias through its use of emotionally charged language. For instance, when describing Gems as "custom AI experts," it uses words like "specific" and "specialized" that convey a sense of precision and control. This language creates a positive emotional association with Gems in the reader's mind. Additionally, when describing pre-made Gems like the Writing editor and Brainstormer, it uses words like "feedback" and "project ideas" that evoke feelings of collaboration and creativity.

Moreover, there is an implicit assumption about who will benefit from this feature most - likely tech-savvy individuals or businesses with existing experience using Google's Workspace applications. The text does not explicitly state this assumption but implies it through its focus on features like customization options for users who already have access to Gemini side panels.

The narrative structure also reveals framing bias by presenting Gems as innovative solutions for various tasks without providing any critical analysis or potential drawbacks. The sequence of information presented in the article follows a linear progression from introducing Gems as new features in Workspace applications to highlighting their benefits without addressing any potential limitations or challenges associated with their implementation.

When discussing pre-made Gems available for immediate use within these apps - such writing editors for feedback on texts - there seems an absence regarding how such tools might impact writers' work processes; whether they could potentially stifle creativity due lack human interaction; what kind implications arise from relying heavily upon algorithms rather than human judgment when evaluating written content etc., These omissions suggest structural bias favoring technological advancements over human perspectives & experiences

The text expresses a sense of excitement and enthusiasm for the new feature, Gems, being introduced to Google Workspace applications. This emotion is evident in the opening sentence, "Google has announced that it is introducing a feature called Gems to its Workspace applications," which conveys a sense of novelty and innovation. The use of the word "introducing" implies a sense of anticipation and eagerness, suggesting that the author is genuinely thrilled about this development.

The text also conveys a sense of pride and accomplishment in describing how Gems can be used to perform specific tasks. For example, it states that users can "program these Gems with instructions for various tasks without needing to repeat them each time." This phrase suggests a sense of empowerment and capability, implying that users will be able to accomplish more with ease.

Furthermore, the text expresses a sense of helpfulness and assistance in explaining how Gems can enhance user responses. The phrase "They can also enhance their responses by providing data such as text, files, and images" implies that Gems are designed to provide support and aid users in their work.

The tone of the text is informative and objective, aiming to educate readers about the new feature rather than persuade or manipulate them. However, there are moments where the author's enthusiasm shines through, making the text more engaging and accessible.

The writer uses various tools to create an emotional impact on the reader. For instance, repeating key benefits like "users can program these Gems with instructions" creates emphasis on what makes Gems useful. The use of action words like "perform," "enhance," and "craft" contributes to an energetic tone that encourages readers to explore this new feature.

Moreover, by highlighting pre-made gems like Writing editor for feedback on text or Brainstormer for project ideas shows how practical they are which helps build trust with potential users who may be interested in trying out these tools.

However; one might argue that this structure could potentially limit clear thinking if readers become overly reliant on emotional appeals rather than critically evaluating information presented before them.