In Alappuzha, a tragic incident occurred where a 29-year-old woman named Angel Jasmin was killed by her father, Francis Josemon, who is 57 years old. The event took place on a Tuesday night when Francis allegedly strangled Angel with a towel while she was asleep. Earlier that day, there had been an argument between Angel and her grandfather.

Angel was taken to the hospital the following morning but was pronounced dead upon arrival. Medical staff grew suspicious of the circumstances surrounding her death and alerted the police. After questioning family members, Francis confessed to the crime. It has been reported that Angel had previously been married but was living with her parents due to ongoing family issues.

Original article

This article provides little to no actionable information. While it reports on a tragic incident, it does not offer any concrete steps, safety procedures, or guidance that could influence personal behavior. The reader is presented with a disturbing event without any context or explanation that could help them understand the circumstances surrounding the crime.

The article lacks educational depth. It does not provide explanations of causes, consequences, systems, or historical context that would equip the reader to understand the topic more clearly. The report is surface-level and does not delve into the underlying issues or factors that may have contributed to the incident.

The subject matter has limited personal relevance for most readers. While domestic violence and family conflicts are serious issues, this specific article does not provide information that would directly impact a reader's real life unless they are directly involved in similar situations.

The article does not serve a public service function. It does not provide access to official statements, safety protocols, emergency contacts, or resources that readers can use. Instead, it appears to exist solely as a news report without any added value.

The recommendations implicit in the article (i.e., avoiding domestic violence) are unrealistic and vague for most readers. There is no concrete guidance on how to prevent such incidents or what steps individuals can take to stay safe.

The potential for long-term impact and sustainability is low. The article reports on a single incident without encouraging behaviors or policies that have lasting positive effects.

The article has no constructive emotional or psychological impact. It presents a disturbing event without offering any support for positive emotional responses such as resilience or hope.

Ultimately, this article primarily exists to inform rather than educate or help readers in a meaningful way. Its primary purpose appears to be reporting on current events rather than providing actionable advice or promoting constructive engagement with its content

This incident is a stark reminder of the breakdown of kinship bonds and the failure of family members to uphold their duties to protect and care for one another. The fact that a father, who is supposed to be a guardian and protector, could commit such a heinous act against his own daughter is a grave indication of the erosion of trust and responsibility within families.

The argument between Angel and her grandfather earlier in the day highlights the lack of peaceful conflict resolution within the family. Instead of resolving their differences through dialogue and understanding, the situation escalated into violence, resulting in tragic consequences.

The fact that Angel was living with her parents due to ongoing family issues suggests that there were deeper problems within the family that were not being addressed. This incident underscores the importance of strong family relationships and the need for families to work together to resolve their issues in a peaceful and constructive manner.

The death of Angel at the hands of her father will have long-term consequences for the family and community. It will lead to a breakdown in trust and relationships among family members, making it even more challenging for them to come together to support one another. The loss of a young life will also impact the community's ability to thrive and survive, as it relies on the procreation and care of future generations.

Furthermore, this incident highlights the need for families to prioritize their responsibilities towards their children and elders. Fathers, mothers, and extended kin have a duty to protect, care for, and nurture their family members, particularly those who are vulnerable. The failure to uphold these duties can have devastating consequences, as seen in this case.

If such incidents are allowed to continue unchecked, they will lead to a further erosion of family bonds, community trust, and ultimately, the survival of future generations. It is essential for families and communities to recognize the importance of upholding their duties towards one another and work towards creating an environment where conflicts are resolved peacefully, and everyone feels safe and protected.

In conclusion, this incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of strong kinship bonds, peaceful conflict resolution, and upholding family duties. The real consequence of such incidents spreading unchecked will be the breakdown of families, communities, and ultimately, the survival of future generations. It is crucial for individuals to recognize their responsibilities towards their families and communities and work towards creating an environment where everyone can thrive and feel safe.

The text presents a tragic incident of a 29-year-old woman named Angel Jasmin being killed by her 57-year-old father, Francis Josemon. The language used to describe the event is straightforward and factual, but upon closer examination, several biases and manipulations become apparent. For instance, the text employs a narrative bias by framing the story in a way that emphasizes the tragic nature of the event. The use of words like "tragic" and "allegedly" creates an emotional tone that primes the reader to sympathize with Angel's situation. This framing can be seen in phrases such as "a tragic incident occurred" and "the event took place on a Tuesday night when Francis allegedly strangled Angel with a towel while she was asleep." These phrases create an atmosphere of shock and horror, which can influence the reader's perception of the events.

Furthermore, the text exhibits structural bias by presenting only one side of the story - that of Francis Josemon's alleged crime. There is no mention of any mitigating circumstances or alternative perspectives that might have contributed to the events leading up to Angel's death. This omission creates a narrative that reinforces a particular ideology: that Francis Josemon is solely responsible for Angel's death. The text states, "After questioning family members, Francis confessed to the crime," which implies that there was no doubt about his guilt without providing any evidence or context for his confession.

The text also displays linguistic bias through its use of emotionally charged language. Phrases like "strangled with a towel while she was asleep" create vivid images in the reader's mind and evoke strong emotions. This type of language can be seen as manipulative because it influences how readers perceive and process information about sensitive topics like violence against women.

Additionally, sex-based bias is present in how Angel is described as being killed by her father due to an argument earlier in their relationship involving her grandfather; however this detail does not provide enough context about what happened during this argument or why it led up until this point where he allegedly strangled her with towels while she slept . Furthermore ,it mentions angel had previously been married but living with parents due ongoing family issues but does not delve deeper into specifics regarding those issues nor does it reveal whether these issues were related directly towards angel’s death

Economic class-based bias may also be inferred from how little attention given towards societal pressures faced by women especially those who have experienced domestic violence before . As stated earlier angel had previously been married yet still chose live along side parents due ongoing family problems however there isn’t much elaboration provided regarding what exactly these problems entailed nor whether they played role contributing towards angel’s eventual demise .

Linguistic semantic biases are evident throughout this passage including passive voice hiding agency such as when stating “Angel was taken hospital following morning” instead saying someone took her which could easily indicate who actually transported her there thus leaving room speculation over potential motives behind actions taken prior incident occurring

Selection omission biases occur when certain facts viewpoints sources selectively included excluded guide interpretation ;in case here we see selective inclusion only one perspective presented without acknowledging other potential explanations surrounding circumstances leading up until point where francis allegedly committed crime against daughter .

The input text conveys a range of emotions that guide the reader's reaction and shape the message. One of the most prominent emotions is sadness, which is evoked by the tragic incident of Angel Jasmin's murder by her father. The phrase "tragic incident" itself sets a somber tone, and the description of Angel being killed while asleep creates a sense of vulnerability and helplessness. The use of words like "strangled" and "allegedly" adds to the gravity and seriousness of the situation, making the reader feel sorrowful for Angel's untimely death.

The text also conveys anger, particularly towards Francis Josemon, who committed such a heinous crime. The phrase "killed by her father" is stark and accusatory, implying that Francis' actions were reprehensible. The fact that he allegedly strangled Angel with a towel while she was asleep further emphasizes his brutality. This anger serves to condemn Francis' actions and create outrage in the reader.

Fear is another emotion present in the text, particularly in relation to family conflicts. The mention of an argument between Angel and her grandfather earlier that day creates tension and suggests that domestic violence or abuse may be present in this family. This fear factor makes the reader worry about Angel's safety before even knowing about her tragic fate.

Sympathy is also elicited through various descriptions, such as Angel being taken to hospital but pronounced dead upon arrival. This sequence of events highlights her suffering and ultimately futile attempts at saving her life, evoking pity from readers.

The writer uses various tools to increase emotional impact, including repetition (e.g., emphasizing Francis' guilt) and vivid descriptions (e.g., using words like "strangled"). These techniques steer readers' attention towards specific aspects of the story while creating an emotional connection with them.

However, it's essential for readers to recognize these emotional manipulations to stay in control of their understanding. By identifying where emotions are used – often subtly – readers can distinguish between facts (the actual events) and feelings (the author's intended emotional response). This awareness enables them to critically evaluate information rather than being swayed solely by emotional appeals.

Ultimately, this text aims to create sympathy for Angel Jasmin while condemning Francis Josemon's actions through its portrayal of sadness, anger, fear, and sympathy-inducing descriptions. By doing so, it encourages readers to empathize with victims like Angel rather than perpetrators like Francis Josemon – promoting moral outrage against domestic violence or abuse – without explicitly stating these intentions through explicit arguments or persuasive language