In Gaza, the ongoing conflict has dramatically altered daily life for many residents. Hanya Aljamal, a 28-year-old woman, shared her experiences of living in a war zone. Previously an English teacher with aspirations to study abroad, she now finds herself displaced and struggling to find purpose amid the chaos.

Hanya lives with her family in a small apartment after being forced to move multiple times since the war began. The United Nations estimates that 90% of Gazans have been displaced due to the conflict. She describes her mornings spent on the balcony, where she finds solace watching her elderly neighbor tend to his garden despite the destruction surrounding them.

The violence escalated after Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, leading to significant casualties on both sides. Reports indicate that over 56,000 people have died in Gaza since then, mostly civilians. Hanya's school has closed down and she now works for an aid organization called Action for Humanity.

Her days are filled with distributing supplies and supporting children affected by trauma from losing homes and loved ones. She notes how difficult it is to process grief when so many around her are suffering as well. Many families lack basic necessities like food and protein sources due to ongoing shortages.

Amidst this turmoil, Hanya tries to find moments of beauty—like watching kites fly in the sky as symbols of hope for children wanting normalcy in their lives. However, she also faces psychological challenges from constant noise from drones and gunfire nearby.

As Eid al-Adha approached without traditional celebrations or resources available for sacrifice or feasting, Hanya learned about a cousin who was killed while seeking food aid—a stark reminder of the dangers present even in humanitarian efforts.

Through these experiences, Hanya reflects on how drastically life has changed for her and others in Gaza since the onset of war—feeling as though everything she once knew was merely an illusion amidst current realities marked by loss and uncertainty.

Original article

This article does not provide actionable information for the average reader, as it offers no specific steps, survival strategies, or resources that someone outside of Gaza could directly apply to their own life. It also lacks public service utility, as it does not include official statements, safety protocols, or emergency contacts that could be useful to those affected by the conflict. While the article has personal relevance for readers who care about global events or humanitarian issues, its impact is primarily emotional rather than practical. It does not engage in emotional manipulation but instead presents a raw and honest account of life in a war zone, which can evoke empathy and awareness. In terms of educational depth, the article provides some context about the conflict, such as the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, and the displacement of Gazans, but it does not delve into the historical, political, or systemic causes of the conflict in a way that significantly deepens understanding. The practicality of recommendations is not applicable here, as the article does not offer any advice or guidance. Regarding long-term impact and sustainability, the article raises awareness about the ongoing struggles in Gaza, which could inspire readers to seek more information or support humanitarian efforts, but it does not provide tools or knowledge for sustained engagement. Finally, the article has a constructive emotional or psychological impact by fostering empathy and highlighting resilience in the face of adversity, which can encourage readers to reflect on their own lives and appreciate moments of beauty and hope, even in difficult circumstances. Overall, while the article lacks actionable content and deep educational value, it serves to inform and emotionally engage readers about the human cost of conflict, potentially inspiring broader awareness and compassion.

The situation in Gaza, as described through Hanya Aljamal's experiences, presents a stark critique of how war and displacement erode the foundations of family, community, and the care of the vulnerable. The displacement of 90% of Gazans, including Hanya's own multiple relocations, underscores the disruption of stable family life and the potential long-term consequences on family cohesion and the ability to care for children and elders.

The closure of Hanya's school and her shift to working for an aid organization highlight the economic and social dependencies imposed by conflict, which can fracture family structures by forcing individuals into roles that may not support traditional family duties. The psychological challenges faced by Hanya, including constant exposure to violence and trauma, demonstrate how such environments undermine the mental health and stability necessary for effective family care and community trust.

The scarcity of basic necessities like food further exacerbates these issues, placing additional burdens on families already struggling to survive. The loss of traditional celebrations like Eid al-Adha due to lack of resources not only diminishes cultural continuity but also removes vital communal events that strengthen kinship bonds and provide emotional support.

The death of Hanya's cousin while seeking food aid is a tragic reminder of the heightened vulnerabilities in conflict zones, where even humanitarian efforts can become dangerous. This incident underscores the critical need for secure, local solutions that prioritize the protection of life and facilitate community self-sufficiency without reliance on distant or impersonal authorities.

In evaluating these circumstances through the lens of ancestral duty to protect life and balance, it becomes clear that widespread acceptance of such conditions would have devastating consequences for families, children yet to be born, community trust, and the stewardship of the land. The erosion of stable family structures, coupled with economic hardship and constant exposure to violence, threatens procreative continuity by making it increasingly difficult for families to safely raise children.

Furthermore, these conditions undermine local responsibility by forcing communities into dependency on external aid rather than fostering self-sufficiency. The absence of peaceful resolutions to conflict not only endangers current generations but also jeopardizes the future by failing to establish a secure environment where children can grow safely.

Ultimately, if such situations persist unchecked, they will lead to a decline in community cohesion, increased vulnerability among children and elders due to lack access basic necessities ,and diminished capacity for local stewardship over land resources . It is imperative that efforts focus on restoring peace , promoting self sufficiency within communities ,and upholding personal duties towards kin as foundational steps towards healing recovery from trauma .

The text presents a narrative of life in Gaza during the conflict, but it contains several forms of bias that shape the reader's perception. One notable bias is the selection and omission bias, where certain details are included while others are left out to guide the reader's interpretation. For instance, the text focuses heavily on the suffering of Gazans, particularly through Hanya's experiences, but it does not provide an equivalent perspective from the Israeli side. The phrase "The violence escalated after Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023" is mentioned, but the text does not explore the Israeli response or the broader context of the conflict in a balanced manner. This omission favors a narrative that highlights Palestinian suffering without equally addressing the complexities of the situation, which could be seen as favoring a pro-Palestinian viewpoint.

Linguistic and semantic bias is evident in the emotionally charged language used to describe Hanya's experiences and the conditions in Gaza. Phrases like "struggling to find purpose amid the chaos," "constant noise from drones and gunfire nearby," and "a stark reminder of the dangers present even in humanitarian efforts" evoke strong emotional responses from the reader. This language is designed to elicit sympathy for Hanya and other Gazans, framing them as victims of circumstance. While their suffering is undoubtedly real, the use of such emotive language without a similar portrayal of other perspectives skews the narrative toward a particular emotional interpretation, favoring a pro-Palestinian sentiment.

Cultural and ideological bias is present in the way the text portrays life in Gaza. The description of Hanya's mornings spent on the balcony, watching her elderly neighbor tend to his garden, romanticizes resilience in the face of adversity. This portrayal aligns with a common narrative of Palestinian perseverance, which, while inspiring, can also oversimplify the complexities of the conflict. Additionally, the mention of Eid al-Adha and the inability to celebrate it traditionally introduces a religious framing that may resonate more strongly with readers who share similar cultural or religious backgrounds, potentially alienating others.

Economic and class-based bias is subtly embedded in the text through the description of shortages and the lack of basic necessities. The phrase "Many families lack basic necessities like food and protein sources due to ongoing shortages" highlights the economic hardship faced by Gazans. However, the text does not explore the economic conditions or challenges on the Israeli side or the broader regional economic impact of the conflict. This focus on Palestinian economic suffering without a comparable examination of other affected groups favors a narrative that emphasizes the plight of Gazans, potentially at the expense of a more comprehensive view.

Framing and narrative bias is evident in the structure of the story, which centers on Hanya's personal journey and the broader suffering in Gaza. The sequence of information—starting with Hanya's aspirations, moving to her displacement, and ending with her reflections on loss and uncertainty—creates a compelling narrative arc that positions her as a sympathetic figure. This framing guides the reader to view the conflict through her eyes, which, while powerful, limits the scope of understanding by not providing alternative viewpoints or narratives. The text's focus on individual stories of suffering, while impactful, does not address the political, historical, or strategic dimensions of the conflict, favoring an emotional appeal over a balanced analysis.

Confirmation bias is present in the way the text accepts certain assumptions without evidence. For example, the statement "The United Nations estimates that 90% of Gazans have been displaced due to the conflict" is presented as fact without questioning the methodology or accuracy of the estimate. Similarly, the claim that "over 56,000 people have died in Gaza since then, mostly civilians" is provided without context or verification, reinforcing a narrative of widespread civilian casualties. While these figures may be accurate, their inclusion without critical examination assumes the reader's acceptance of these claims, which could be seen as favoring a pro-Palestinian narrative by emphasizing the scale of suffering.

In summary, the text contains multiple forms of bias that shape its narrative. Through selection and omission, linguistic and semantic choices, cultural and ideological framing, economic focus, narrative structure, and confirmation of assumptions, the text favors a pro-Palestinian perspective while minimizing or excluding other viewpoints. These biases are embedded in the language, structure, and context of the text, guiding the reader toward a particular interpretation of the conflict in Gaza.

The text conveys a profound sense of sadness and loss, which permeates throughout Hanya’s story. This emotion is evident in her displacement, the closure of her school, and her struggle to find purpose amidst chaos. Phrases like “struggling to find purpose” and “so many around her are suffering” highlight the depth of her despair. The sadness is intensified by the mention of over 56,000 deaths in Gaza, mostly civilians, and the lack of basic necessities for families. This emotion serves to create sympathy in the reader, drawing attention to the human cost of the conflict and the daily hardships faced by individuals like Hanya.

Alongside sadness, there is a subtle yet persistent fear in the narrative. Hanya’s psychological challenges from constant drone noise and gunfire, as well as the danger highlighted by her cousin’s death while seeking aid, underscore this emotion. The fear is not overt but is woven into the fabric of her daily life, showing how insecurity has become normalized. This emotion causes worry in the reader, emphasizing the unpredictability and danger of living in a war zone.

Despite the overwhelming negativity, moments of hope and resilience emerge. Hanya finds beauty in small things, like watching kites fly as symbols of hope for children. Her work with Action for Humanity, supporting traumatized children and distributing supplies, reflects her determination to make a difference. These instances of hope, though fleeting, serve to inspire the reader, showing that even in dire circumstances, humanity and perseverance can shine through.

The writer uses personal storytelling to deepen emotional impact. By focusing on Hanya’s experiences, the narrative becomes relatable and humanizes the broader conflict. The repetition of themes like displacement, loss, and struggle reinforces the emotional weight of the story. Comparisons, such as contrasting Hanya’s past aspirations with her current reality, highlight the extent of change and loss. These tools steer the reader’s attention toward empathy and understanding, making it harder to remain detached.

The emotional structure of the text shapes opinions by appealing to the reader’s feelings rather than relying solely on facts. While the statistics about displacement and casualties provide context, the emotional narrative ensures the reader connects on a personal level. However, this approach can limit clear thinking by overshadowing other perspectives or complexities of the conflict. Recognizing where emotions are used helps readers distinguish between factual information and emotional appeals, allowing them to form more balanced opinions. By understanding this emotional structure, readers can remain in control of their reactions and avoid being swayed solely by the narrative’s persuasive techniques.